Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7551) - TV Shows (10)

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 20 August 2022 06:59 (A review of Mark Felt: The Man Who Brought Down the White House)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, the first thing I really enjoyed was to finally see Liam Neeson in something else than another lame and generic action flick. On top of that, Neeson was a perfect choice to play the main character and he did deliver here a really solid performance. It’s too bad they didn’t seem to figure out what to do with the other characters who basically looked bewildered through the whole duration and not much else (the biggest victim was Diane Lane as most of her performance apparently did end up on the cutting room floor). Concerning the story itself, by now, there has been already so many movies made about the Watergate scandal but I did like the idea of focusing on Deep Throat’s perspective. As a result, the whole thing might seem like a commercial for Mark Felt himself but also for the FBI in general which was apparently a beacon of unbiased integrity up until that point, at least, according to Felt. However, this approach didn’t bother me, in the contrary, I thought it was intriguing even if Mark Felt probably did sugarcoat the positive aspects of the FBI. Surprisingly, they did show very little interaction with Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein (in fact, Bernstein didn’t show up at all). Of course, it was understandable that the makers did want to distance themselves from the other movies dealing with the Watergate scandal, especially ‘All The President’s Men’. However, this approach did backfire though. Indeed, journalists and especially the Washington Post played a huge role in collaboration with Felt and I think it was a huge mistake to almost obliterate them from this story. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 18 August 2022 10:55 (A review of The World of Apu)

First of all, it’s really too bad I didn’t manage to watch first ‘Pather Panchali’ and ‘Aparajito’ before watching this movie. I did try to get my hands on these 2 movies but I didn’t succeed. Eventually, when I gave up and watched the damned thing, at the end, on the Belgian channel I actually recorded this movie, there was a commercial advertising that these movies were actually available on their streaming platform but, by then, they were already gone. Anyway, it is still a movie that you can watch as a stand-alone. Above all, it was really neat to finally discover Satyajit Ray’s work and I really enjoyed the mood, at least, at first. Indeed, it was so refreshing to see a main character who was poor, who even had nothing but who still seemed to be quite happy and even cheerful. Basically, we have been so conditioned to think that, if we can’t buy everything we desire, we will feel automatically miserable and I loved how this movie really challenged this way of thinking. When he got married, the movie became even better. Sure, their union was really unlikely and, yet, they made such a sweet couple. Indeed, even if they had nothing, they still felt a deep connection and I thought that Soumitra Chatterjee and Sharmila Tagore had a great chemistry (even if Tagore was only 14 years old at the time which was slightly creepy). Eventually, it’s too bad that they kind of lost me when Aparnad died and, to be honest, I didn’t care much for this dramatic turn of events. Basically, in my opinion, it really broke the mood of this movie. Indeed, after that, the main character was constantly roaming with a really grim and depressed demeanor which was hardly rewarding for the viewers, at least, as far as I was concerned. Of course, he was eventually reunited with his son but he was still only a shadow of himself and I thought it was rather frustrating, especially compared to the rest of the movie which was much more compelling. Anyway, to conclude, even it I wasn’t completely sold, it was a really interesting watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Satyajit Ray’s work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 16 August 2022 09:13 (A review of The Cameraman (1928))

A few months ago, I have noticed that there were a few Buster Keaton movies included in the ‘They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They?’ list so I decided to check them out since they were all available on YouTube but, apparently, for some reasons, I actually missed out on this one. Anyway, I thought it was pretty good, even probably one of my favorite movies starring Buster Keaton. Indeed, it was slightly less random than his usual work, even if the monkey still showed up pretty much from nowhere. However, I have to admit that this little monkey was actually pretty awesome though. On top of that, it was by far Keaton’s most romantic feature, at least, among the movies he has made that I have seen so far. As a result, of course, the jokes and stunts were still the main focus but, in my opinion, Keaton’s character was actually very well balanced. Indeed, I don’t think he was a complete loser. Sure, he was seriously clumsy, even pretty much a walking disaster but he was also so much more charismatic than all the other guys that tried to hook up with the character played by the charming Marceline Day. Eventually, I wasn’t so surprised that she would fall for him. And yet, even though there was absolutely nothing wrong with this movie and I mostly enjoyed it, to be honest, I have to admit that it never grabbed me though but it’s usually the case with Keaton’s movies. It’s so weird because I’m actually a huge fan of Chaplin’s silent comedies. Maybe it’s because I grew up with Chaplin’s work while I discovered Keaton’s work much later on as a grown-up. Anyway, to conclude, it was a solid vintage silent comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 14 August 2022 07:08 (A review of Mass)

Following our previous movie with my filmclub which was seriously heartbreaking, we watched another movie which wasn’t really easier to swallow. It doesn’t mean that it was bad, though, in the contrary. Basically, it was a hyper minimalist drama with only one room and four characters. So, there was no action scenes or flashbacks showing what happened at the time but this minimalist approach allowed a great focus on the dialogues and the 4 actors who all delivered some top-notch performances. As a result, there was a lot of room to develop all the characters who were all so complex, not only in the way they were grieving and coping with this tragedy but also in general. In spite of the grim setup, I thought it was actually a really humanist movie showing that, at the end of the day, with such tragedies, they are only victims. Strangely, I thought this outcome was actually fairly optimistic, maybe too much for me and I believe that, in many cases, maybe even in most cases, people would choose rather to hate instead of choosing to forgive and to heal. However, it’s easy to judge when you have not been through the worst nightmare that could happen to any parent, no matter if your kid turns out to be a victim or a perpetrator, and the wide range of thoughts and feelings displayed by the actors in this movie was just downright impressive. To be honest, I didn’t care much about the religious undertones showing at the very last moment. Seriously, it came out of nowhere and, as far as I was concerned, it was rather misguided, but, fortunately, it wasn’t a dealbreaker though. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was probably missing something to be really great, it was still a strong intimate drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 14 August 2022 06:47 (A review of Stay on Board: The Leo Baker Story)

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but, after reading the review on Indiewire, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, I have to admit that I had never heard of Lacey/Leo Baker before watching this movie but his journey definitely turned out to be quite amazing. I mean, if nothing else, it does show how urgent it is for a trans person to go through their transition if a top athlete decides to let go the most prestigious competition in the world to focus instead on this process. In this case, it was even more historical since it was the first time ever that skateboarding was included in the Olympic Games. But it was something made crystal clear in this movie, Baker was going through hell during his 14 years career as he was constantly handled as a girl, as a female skateboarder, which was something going completely against who he actually was. Even for a supposedly ‘cool’ sport like skateboarding, it does seem to be a major issue but can you imagine how it must be in the more mainstream sports? For example, in football (or soccer), it is extremely rare that a professional player will come out as gay. Furthermore, even after leaving the competition, Leo still managed to keep skateboarding probably in a much more satisfying way and such opportunities would probably not be available in many other sports. Still, it doesn’t diminish the fact that his journey was just so impressive and so inspiring. I mean, at some point, he was one of the best female skateboarders in the world and, even if he might have hated this label, the pressure coming from everywhere to keep delivering whatever they were asking for was just huge. Anyway, to conclude, it turned out to be a really strong documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in this subject. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 13 August 2022 06:44 (A review of Instant Family)

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved and since it was available on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, after the rather weak ‘Daddy’s Home’ and ‘Daddy’s Home 2’, I have to admit that Sean Anders and Mark Wahlberg finally came up with an interesting story. Indeed, there is no denying that the adoption of foster children is so much more intriguing and important than the endless bickering between a father and a step-father. Unfortunately, they still seriously messed up the tone though. For some reason, they tried to make this tough subject easier to swallow but this feather light approach turned out to be really misguided. It’s too bad because the characters were actually pretty good and you can only wonder what would have been the end-result if they would have toned down the silly jokes. Coming back on the characters, Mark Whalberg and Rose Byrne made a convincing couple, they had some great chemistry together and there was nothing silly about the struggles they had to face. Concerning the kids, eventually, only Isabella Merced’s character was actually developed but even this character worked because she felt real. Indeed, it is hard to put in perspective how borderline impossible it must be for a teenager growing up through all her childhood in such a highly toxic environment to adjust in a seemingly normal family structure like the one displayed in this movie. Unfortunately, this problematic was barely scratched here but it was probably too much to ask for with such a mainstream inspiring comedy so much of the really dark stuff was eventually filtered out. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch dealing with an important subject and I think it is worth a look. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 12 August 2022 09:17 (A review of Bullet Train)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since the trailers looked pretty cool, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it was rather poorly received by the critics and even though it will probably be a flop at the box-office, I thought the damned thing turned out to be actually terribly fun. First of all, it was just so refreshing to see an action flick which had no link with some super-heroes or some other huge franchise. Of course, with David Leitch in the director’s chair, the action scenes, especially the fighting scenes, were pretty badass but I was above all sold by the wacky tone. Furthermore, even though there were many characters involved, I was rather impressed by the fact that almost all of them actually worked pretty well. The only exception was probably Joey King’s character. I don’t blame King herself, she wasn’t bad at all and I understand what they were trying to do with this young girl but this character just didn’t really work or, at least, I didn’t care much about her. By the way, it’s only afterwards that I noticed that Logan Lerman was actually involved in this movie. Eventually, their biggest asset was Brad Pitt though. Indeed, he managed to find a pitch-perfect tone and Pitt really found a tricky balance for this character. Basically, even if the guy tried to avoid violence as much as possible, he was never a complete loser though. Anyway, his interactions with the other characters were most of time just so much fun. All in all, to conclude, even if it was nothing really ground-breaking, it was still a really entertaining flick and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 11 August 2022 11:17 (A review of Stan & Ollie (2018))

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. When I was a kid, I really loved Laurel and Hardy but I have to admit that, for a couple of decades, I hadn’t watch any of their movies. However, about 6 months ago, after all these years, I finally saw once again one of their movies, the classic ‘Sons of the Desert’, and, to be honest, I think their antics were actually much more enjoyable when I was a kid. Still, there is no denying that they were one of the greatest comedy duos ever so it was pretty neat to see a biographical movie focusing on them. However, even if this movie was fairly well received when it was released, to be honest, it didn’t really grab me though. The tricky thing with such biographical movies dealing with a specific time period is that you might wonder if the chosen time period was really so interesting. I mean, the intro was fine and both sides were actually fairly well developed but, then, they completely skipped how these two guys got back together after their falling out. Then, focusing on their tour in Great Britain was not a bad idea but, for too long, not much or not enough was actually going on. Eventually, it was only when they had their argument towards the end that this tale started to get really intriguing. Still, there is no denying that Steve Coogan and John C. Reilly were really good, especially Coogan whose resemblance with Stan Laurel was just uncanny. Anyway, to conclude, even if I wasn’t completely sold, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in this hilarious comedy duo. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 9 August 2022 06:40 (A review of The Midwife)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was starring Catherine Deneuve, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I thought it was not bad at all, even if it never really became much more than that. In my opinion, the main issue was that, even though most of it was fairly interesting, there were just too many ideas and sub-plots involved and most of them were as a result really half-baked. Let’s take Claire, the main character, for example. She was a midwife, the clinic she was working for was closing, her son was dropping out of medical school and was having a baby, his father was unknown and she just met a new guy. And I shouldn’t forget that we never get to know who was her mother and that her father also killed himself. Then, you had BĂ©atrice whose incredible life could be developed in a whole mini-series. Seriously, by dropping off half of all these ideas, the whole thing would have been more much efficient and interesting to watch. In fact, when you think about it, the story was actually pretty basic and even seriously predictable and the makers probably tried to cover this up with all this stuff. Still, the two Catherine’s (Frot and Deneuve) were at the top of their game and they both delivered some really solid performances. Indeed, it was a hard sale to make us believe that, after all what happened between them, after all these years, that Claire would still welcome BĂ©atrice in her life but both women really made it work though. Indeed, you can sense that back then and again in the present day, they both felt a connection, a connection Claire never felt with her mother or probably even with anyone else in her life. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a solid drama and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 1 year, 9 months ago on 29 July 2022 10:13 (A review of Man of Aran)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was included in the ‘They Shoot Pictures, Don’t They?’ list, I was quite eager to check it out. I have to admit that I had never heard of the Aran islands before but it definitely didn’t seem to be the most welcoming place to live. On the other hand, I already saw a couple of movies directed by Robert J. Flaherty, especially the impressive ‘Nanook of the North’. Eventually, the guy was rightfully considered as the precursor of the modern documentaries, even if there was always something fake in pretty much all his movies. For example, in this case, even though the shark hunting was quite spectacular, it was apparently something they haven’t done for many years, even decades. However, there was one thing that wasn’t fake and it was the sea itself. Indeed, I can’t remember the last time I saw such incredible sea footage showing how the sea can be and, apparently, always is raging at these remote Irish islands. Especially at the beginning, you get to see this family of fishermen going back and forth trying to retrieve some net and this scene was just so weird and yet quite mesmerizing at the same time. It’s too bad the copy I saw on YouTube was pretty weak (on the other hand, I should have maybe lower my expectations since this movie is almost 100 years old). However, even so, the damned thing was still visually quite impressive. To be honest, you don’t get the opportunity to really get to know the people involved in this movie but it was rather impressive how cheerful and seemingly happy they seemed to be. Anyway, to conclude, as usual with Flaherty, I really enjoyed this vintage documentary and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry