Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7698) - TV Shows (10)

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 22 June 2012 11:00 (A review of Tetro)

Back in the 70's, Francis Ford Coppola made 4 movies and all of them became masterpieces. I mean, the guy was on fire and, basically, the best film director working at the time. Unfortunately, 40 years later, even though he had a prolific career, he never reached this level again. Anyway, at some point, Coppola did make a come back after 10 years without directing anything and the end result was actually pretty good. First of all, the black and white cinematography was really neat and reminded me of those good old neo-realist features (as a matter of fact, Coppola was inspired by 'La notte' while making this movie). Concerning Vincent Gallo, you may hate the guy or not but he delivered here a really solid performance, like the rest of the cast. Still, even though the story was intriguing, to be honest, it wasn’t really fascinating and it was rather obvious that the accent was on the style and the performances rather than the substance. As a result, sometimes, I didn't care much about what was going on. Still, according to Coppola, it was the most beautiful film he has ever made and, indeed, it was a visual marvel. To conclude, it was a rather intimate and well made drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Coppola's work.



4 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 22 June 2012 09:19 (A review of Sherlock Holmes)

Following his come-back thanks to 'Iron Man', Robert Downey Jr followed up with another high-profile gig, a modern version of one of the oldest characters, Sherlock Holmes. I always had a weak spot for Guy Ritchie's work, even though he hasn't done anything amazing since 'Snatch'. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, I thought it was pretty good. Indeed, this movie looked really good and the action scenes worked pretty well without overshadowing the rest of the movie. Of course, the best was the casting. Indeed, Downey Jr was awesome and totally rocked this performance and Jude Law was a good choice for Watson. However, to be honest, the whole thing it was still nothing mind-blowing though. I mean, it was fairly entertaining and I enjoyed how they rationally explained everything at the end like a good old Holmes tale but, honestly, it was not a really strong story. Basically, they were way too busy making sure the whole thing looked badass, that Robert Downey Jr sounded cool when they should have spent more time on a strong and spellbinding story. It was the same issue with the dialogues, some of them were entertaining, but some other were way too convoluted and I understand that they wanted to make it sound clever but it didn’t always work. Anyway, to conclude, it was still a well made and entertaining blockbuster and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A great movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 19 June 2012 06:28 (A review of A Prophet)

Since I kept hearing some really good things about this flick, I was really so eager to see it. Well, I wasn't disappointed, that's for sure. Indeed, it was pretty much a masterpiece and easily one of the best French movies I have seen during the last 10 years. I was already impressed by Audiard's previous directing effort, 'De battre mon coeur s'est arrêté', but this movie was even better. Basically, it was one of the grimmest, dreariest jail dramas I have ever seen and, compared to this movie, 'The Shawshank Redemption' was a pretty much a disney flick. Indeed, the jail was so dirty, so depressing, they tell you about reintegration but how could you become a better person after spending time in such a vile and hostile environment?!? The main character was a fine example as he started out as a scary lamb but slowly became a wolf, even though he was still traumatized by the first murder he committed there. To this purpose, they added some paranormal, dreamlike sequences but they did fit perfectly with the grim reality of this picture. Even though you eventually spend more than two hours with this guy, you are never sure about his thoughts or his feelings and it made the whole thing even more spellbinding to watch. Anyway, to conclude, it was a rather depressing feature but also a masterpiece and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 18 June 2012 01:48 (A review of A Very Long Engagement (2005))

I always had some mixed feelings concerning 'Le fabuleux destin d'Amélie Poulain'. On one hand, I really admired the craftmanship behind it and it was visually definitely a real beauty. However, on the other hand, I thought the story was ok but nothing really amazing and, above all, I was annoyed to death by the hype surrounding this flick, first in France and than in the rest of the world. So, I didn't know what to expect from the next feature directed by Jean-Pierre Jeunet and starring Audrey Tautou. By now, I have seen it twice and, to my surprise, I really enjoyed it and, as a matter of fact, I think it it is better than 'Le fabuleux destin...'. Indeed, it was visually as impressive but I thought that this time, the story was more straightforward (a young woman looks for a lover) but also less pretentious and annoying. You have once again a top cast (Audrey Tautou, Gaspard Ulliel, Dominique Pinon, André Dussollier, Ticky Holgado, Marion Cotillard, Jodie Foster, Jean-Pierre Darroussin, Clovis Cornillac, Denis Lavant, Albert Dupontel, Jean-Paul Rouve, Julie Depardieu, Tchéky Karyo, Jean-Claude Dreyfus), it looked really good and the story was downright entertaining. To conclude, even though it wasn't as successful 'Le fabuleux destin...', in my opinion, it is actually better and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 18 June 2012 11:50 (A review of Killing Me Softly)

After reaching some major success and recognition abroad, Chen Kaige decided to make one (and so far only) english speaking feature. It gathered some really average reviews but I don't think it was that bad actually. The main characters are portrayed by Joseph Fiennes (Ralph's little brother) and Heather Graham (a major sexpot) and even though they both delivered some decent performances, I couldn't help thinking that the movie would have been better with some stronger actors. The story is basically your typical erotic thriller with some improbable steamy sex scenes and a succession of even more improbable twists at the end. I make it sound very lame and even though it was nothing mind-blowing whatsoever, it was still entertaining somehow. Still, we are far from the masterpieces directed by Chen Kaige and the whole thing seems rather a waste of his time and precious talent. Still, if you don't expect anything amazing, it is actually a decent erotic thriller and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 18 June 2012 11:05 (A review of New Rose Hotel)

Back in the 90's, I was a huge fan of Abel Ferrara's work so I was really dying to watch this flick. Ferrara has never been an easy director but I always found his movies really mesmerizing. However, all the movies he directed during the last decade were more alienating than fascinating to watch and this flick is not an exception, I'm afraid. Indeed, the directing was decent, nothing mind-blowing though, there was a very good cast (Christopher Walken, Willem Dafoe, Asia Argento, Annabella Sciorra, Gretchen Mol) but it was just very slow, there was almost nothing going on during the whole thing and there was literally not one single line of dialog during the whole movie which didn't sound really cryptic. And yet, I cannot completely dismiss this flick. Indeed, Ferrara has such a different approach concerning the way of telling a story, it is still rather refreshing compared to your average Hollywood production. To conclude, even though it is rather slow and even boring at some point, it remains an interesting flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Abel Ferrara's movies.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 18 June 2012 08:23 (A review of Dragonfly)

I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Kevin Costner, I thought I should give it a try. Tom Shadyac had some major success with comedies ('Bruce Almighty', 'Liar Liar', 'The Nutty Professor', 'Ace Ventura: Pet Detective') especially with Jim Carrey but this time, he tries something completely different, a supernatural drama. For Kevin Costner, it was also a different genre and you have to give him some credit for trying. Unfortunately, I thought the whole thing was pretty bad. Indeed, it was preposterous which was something expected with this genre but it was also really overly sentimental and terribly cheesy. Kevin Costner tries really hard and I don't think he should be blame for this but what a snooze party... Indeed, above all, I thought it was completely boring and I didn't care at all about the story and/or the characters involved. To conclude, even though Kevin Costner is a nice actor, I thought it was just a bad movie and it is not really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 17 June 2012 08:46 (A review of Mr. Brooks)

Since I kept hearing good things about this flick, I became really curious about it. First of all, I think it was awesome to see Kevin Costner portray a psychopath. Costner became a superstar playing heros, righteous men and such and it was brilliant to see him playing the exact opposite. The other masterstroke was to choose William Hurt to portray his 'imaginary' friend. Futhermore, both men delivered some strong performances so the basic elements were there and made up for an enjoyable thriller. Unfortunately, there were a few things which didn't work out so well. First of all, I thought that Demi Moore was far from being convincing. I mean, she's supposed to be some cop but compared to how impressice Costner and Hurt were, she was just not really believable. There was aslo another annoying subplot concerning Dane Cook which didn't work for me either. A part from that, it is actually an entertaining and rather intense psychological thriller. To conclude, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 17 June 2012 08:20 (A review of Things Change)

I'm not a huge fan of David Mamet's work as a director but I was rather curious to check his sophomore directing effort, even though it seems to be a rather obscure flick. Basically, it is a minimalist gangster movie with some dry humor. It features two strong performances by Don Ameche and Joe Mantegna who perfectly deliver the typical Mamet's dialog. There were also William H. Macy and Felicity Huffman with small parts. There is some kind of poetry to the proceedings and it defers with your typical gangster flick in the sense that there is no shooting, no chases, no violence whatsoever, at least, not on the screen. No, it is a character driven picture and I thought it made a very interesting viewing. Still, it remains an acquired taste since nothing much happpens during the whole thing and the tempo is rather slow. To conclude, even though it is a rather osbcure flick, it is actually pretty good and definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in David Mamet's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 16 June 2012 02:52 (A review of Bait)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Antoine Fuqua and was starring Jamie Foxx, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all,  even though Jamie Foxx originally started out with some comic parts and, eventually, became an Academy Award winner, in between, he actually tried to become an action movie star but it never really worked out very well. I mean, it seemed at first like a good idea, to combine his wisecrack humour with some badass action scenes which is reminiscent of Bruce Willis, probably my favourite action movie star ever. The problem was that, in this movie, his character should have been  entertaining but, eventually, he turned out to be more obnoxious than anything else. Furthermore, Antoine Fuqua is a decent director but the whole thing was rather uninspired and bland in my opinion. Sure, you had some unexpected twists but they felt pretty random and obligatory. Above all, I was rather bored by the whole thing and even though it may not have been one of the worst action movies I have ever seen, it was still pretty much unremarkable. Anyway, to conclude, it is a rather average action flick and it is not really worth a look, even if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry