Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 16 June 2012 02:24
(A review of
Unstoppable)
Since it was the last movie directed by Tony Scott which I hadn't seen yet, I definitely had to see it at some point. I have to admit that I'm not really a big fan of action movies since most of them are rather preposterous and predictable. However, this one turned out to be quite enjoyable. Indeed, Tony Scott was one of the best action movie directors and it definitely showed on the screen. I mean, how could you make an exciting movie about such a static and inert thing such as a train?!? But Scott did pull it off and, for 90 minutes, I was actually wondering what would happen next. For the 5th time around, Denzel Washington was working again with this director and he delivered one of his usual performances, the righteous man under a terrible ordeal. To be honest, it could be nice if he did something else once a while but he does it so well, I won't blame him. Honestly, Washington and Pine didn’t have actually much to do and actually nothing much happened during the whole thing but, surprisingly, it was still quite entertaining and I think it had to do with the fact that they chose a realistic approach and it worked very well. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing was nothing amazing, it was still a well made and entertaining action flick and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 15 June 2012 02:15
(A review of
Memphis Belle)
Even though Michael Caton-Jones is far from being a great director, I always had a weak spot for his work so I was really eager to watch his sophomore effort. Eventually, it was a pretty good WII flick, maybe not really original, but definitely entertaining. I enjoyed above all the solid directing by Caton-Jones and there was also a nice cast filled with some interesting young actors (Matthew Modine, Eric Stoltz, D.B. Sweeney, Billy Zane, Sean Astin, Harry Connick Jr., David Strathairn, John Lithgow, Jane Horrocks). By the way, what happened to Matthew Modine?!? This guy showed up in this and two other great WWII flicks ('Birdy' and 'Full Metal Jacket') but it seems that he never really had his breakthrough and we don't hear much from him anymore. Anyway, even though it is now a rather obscure flick, I think it remains a solid WWII feature with a decent mix between the harsh realities and glamorization of War. It was probably a plus that there was no huge star and, this way, you were able to care for them as a group instead of focusing on one specific character. To conclude, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 15 June 2012 12:52
(A review of
Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country)
I already saw this flick but since it was a while back and since I have it on DVD, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, following the abysmal 5th entry, they gave us once again and for the last time, the original crew and, I must say, it is one of my favorite Star Trek flicks. Indeed, at last, they gave us some decent special effects, still nothing mind-blowing though but compared to the cheesy stuff they gave us in all the previous movies, it was way better and I also enjoyed all these weird looking aliens. Furthermore, it was their best story so far, it was really entertaining and finally, the Klingons had a central part. I never understood why in the previous movies the Klingons were barely used. Furthermore, the original cast was there including a few guests (Kim Cattrall, Kurtwood Smith, Christopher Plummer, Iman, Christian Slater) and Plummer was pretty awesome, as usual, but I wasn't so sure of Kim Cattrall as a Vulcan. Maybe it is too bad they didn't develop more the whole concept concerning the Klingons needing help when they were in fact the archenemy. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really groundbreaking, it was still an entertaining flick, a great farewell for this mighty crew, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 15 June 2012 07:38
(A review of
Death Becomes Her)
When I was about 12 years old, I actually saw this flick at the movie theater when it was released. To be honest, I'm not sure if it was really appropriate or anything for me to watch it at that age but I had a good time and I eventually never forgot it. Eventually, I watched it again 20 years later and, to be honest, I thought it was still pretty good. Basically, it is a very dark and sardonic comedy directed by Robert Zemeckis. Furthermore, you had a pretty cool cast (Meryl Streep, Goldie Hawn, Bruce Willis, Isabella Rossellini) and they all delivered some decent performances, above all, Bruce Willis who played against his usual type very well here. On top of that, the special effects which were quite awesome when I was a kid and still hold up pretty good nowadays (You can say whatever you want about Robert Zemeckis but the guy is and has always been a special effects wizard). I must admit that the story was rather messy and it is not surprising since the film underwent some major re-editing after some negative feedback was received during the test screenings. I guess I like it above all out of nostalgia but I still think it is a nice black comedy. To conclude, it is a rather forgotten and obscure dark feature but I think it is actually worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 14 June 2012 08:46
(A review of
Anna and the King)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since Jodie Foster is one of my favorite actress, I thought I should still check it out. First of all, I haven't seen the original movie so I couldn't compare both. Anyway, my wife loved it but I didn't really like it very much. I mean, come on! I have seen 'The Last Emperor' which was really mesmerizing and, for me, this is just a pale and romanticized version. The sets, the costums, everything look prettty good and Jodie Foster and Chow Yun Fat both give some decent performances but what a boring story... The whole thing was just really predictable and uninspiring, in my opinion. Ok, nowadays, Jodie Foster doesn't do anything really amazing but she used to be an amazing actress back in the days and it is quite sad to see her end up here. I mean, I couldn't help thinking while watching this that she purely did this gig for the paycheck. I guess it is also a matter of taste, I mean, if you are into those romantic flicks, you would probably enjoy it more than me but I was rather bored during the whole thing. To conclude, I didn't really like it and I don't think it is really worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 13 June 2012 10:07
(A review of
Love's Labour's Lost)
In 2011, Kenneth Branagh had a rather impressive come-back as a director with 'Thor' but, honestly, none of his movies he made during the 2000's were either critical or financial successful and it seems that most of those movies were barely seen. It is rather surprising since Branagh was really succesfull in the 90's. Anyway, he started the 2000's with yet another Shakespeare adaptation, it definitely belongs to his most obscure work and it took me years to find this on DVD. The end-results was ok but nothing much than that, I'm afraid. I mean, first of all, expect from Branagh, you have a B cast (Alessandro Nivola, Alicia Silverstone, Natascha McElhone, Matthew Lillard, Emily Mortimer, Nathan Lane, Timothy Spall) and they were not bad but compared to the all-star cast of 'Much Ado About Nothing', it is definitely another kind of ball game. So, the story is kind of weak, it mixes Shakespeare with some musicals songs and dances, a whole bunch of things which I'm not really fond of so, even though I have the utmost respect for the endeavour, I can't say I really enjoyed it. Still, Kenneth Branagh is and remains a great Shakespeare master and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 13 June 2012 08:50
(A review of
Agora)
I was quite blown away by 'Mar adentro' which was basically the best Spanish movie I have ever seen so I was really eager to watch Alejandro Amenabar’s following directing effort. I was rather amazed that this movie was barely seen and quickly forgotten. Indeed, it might not have been Amenabar's best movie so far but I thought it was still pretty good. Basically, it was dealing with philosophy, science, religion and love and most of it was actually quite spellbinding. The main issue was that it was probably too ambitious and all those ideas were not really well developed after all. For example, there were not one but two romances around Hypatia but I understand why they added those. Indeed, it was to add some human dimension to these grand scale events but those romances were more annoying than anything else eventually. Furthermore, the movie was fairly anti-Christian since the Christians were portrayed as merciless bullies. Of course, they destroyed some invaluable books and artifacts in the past but so did the Muslims, the Jews, the Pagans or any other religion. Eventually, the message was really striking but the execution was rather heavy-handed. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still an intelligent film, something rare nowadays, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Religion.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 12 June 2012 12:23
(A review of
The Forgotten)
It might sound weird but before watching a movie, I don't read what it's about. When you do read the story, sometimes you loose the first 30 minutes because you already know what is going to happen. I'd rather discover the events together with the characters and I think it is a much more rewarding watching experience. So, before watching this flick, I didn't have a clue what it was about and the beginning was quite fascinating. Indeed, did Julianne Moore's character really have a kid or is she just really crazy ? So, I thought it could be a deep and fascinating character study going all psychological but, unfortunately, it wasn't meant to be. Within 20 minutes, it is revealed that her son has been adducted by Aliens and the rest of the movie is just a succession of endless and boring action scenes... I thought it was so frustrating... I mean, they have a perfectly fine premise (a woman who desperatly wants a child, gets a miscarriage and makes him up) but, instead, they completely ruined it. Julianne Moore shouldn't be blamed, she does her best with the character but she won't be remembered for this movie, that's for sure. To conclude, it is a really average thriller and it is not really worth a look.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 12 June 2012 11:54
(A review of
Birthday Girl)
Before watching this flick, I had never heard of it before so I wasn't sure what I should expect. First of all, even though the actors were all pretty good and delivered some solid performances, it was still some rather weird piece of casting, if you ask me. I mean, 3 of the main characters are supposed to be Russian but, in fact, they are Australian (Nicole Kidman) and French (Vincent Cassel and Mathieu Kassovitz). Why?!? In my opinion, it was the major issue with this movie but a part from that, it was pretty enjoyable. Indeed, I liked the whole concept of this guy ordering a new wife from Russia but the whole thing eventually blows up in this face and all the actors involved were pretty good, even if they weren't even Russian. It was also rather funny to see Ben Chaplin again. What happened to this guy actually??! I remember seeing him in a few flicks during the 90's but since then, he seems to have vanished... Anyway, in spite of its flaws, it remains a rather entertaining crime comedy and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 12 years, 6 months ago on 12 June 2012 11:22
(A review of
Monsieur Batignole)
Gérard Jugnot is not really famous abroad but he is really famous in France, first of all as a comedic actor. He has also built up a decent career as a director and, if I'm not mistaken, this flick was his most successful, financially speaking. Basically, it is one of those typical French WWII movie where the French people are depicted as heros and resistants when, in reality, only a marginal amount of the population was involved in the resistance or any other activities against the Nazis. However, the French people really like to focus on their heroes but I always find it rather annoying as they tend to forget all the terrible things the French people did back then. Furthermore, they picked up a really nice Jewish boy and Mr Batignolle starts as cold-hearted b*st*rd but then slowly becomes a hero.... So, it is definitely nothing really original and rather stereotypical but it remains a well made drama and Gérard Jugnot who not only directed the movie but gave himself the lead, was pretty good as well. Anyway, to conclude, it is an unoriginal but still fairly decent WWII drama and it is worth a look, especially if you like French movies.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry