Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7791) - TV Shows (10)

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 18 January 2012 08:28 (A review of Swing Time (1936))

Since this movie was on the list ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’, of course, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, to  be honest, I have to admit that I have never been a huge musical fan. As a matter of fact, I recently saw ‘La La Land’ and even though , it was a big critical and commercial success, I still had a hard time to care about the damned thing. Well, coming back to our main feature, since it is a huge classic, I still had to watch it at some point. Well, even though I usually prefer Gene Kelly, I must admit that Fred Astaire was really awesome in this flick. Indeed, together with Ginger Rogers, they had some great chemistry and they gave some really strong dance scenes here. Furthermore, I laughed a few times, above all  thanks to the supporting cast which was pretty good. Still, even though I'm well aware that it is inherent to the genre, the plot was just so silly and frivolous and I really had a hard time to care about the story and the characters involved. Still, it is and remains a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like this genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 17 January 2012 09:26 (A review of Fierce Creatures)

Back then, in the 80's, the same cast (John Cleese, Jamie Lee Curtis, Kevin Kline, Michael Palin) worked together and made one of the most ridiculous and hilarious comedy ever, 'A fish called Wanda'. It was a deserved success and, 10 years later, they were back together and you would hope that it would be again a smash it. Unfortunately, even though it wasn't bad at all, this second flick was unfortunately nothing really mind-blowing. I mean, there were a few laughs here and there, it was expected with those guys but, unfortunately, it never reached its potential. I think the issue is that the story was not really interesting enough and it was the same thing concerning the characters. I mean, you can add as many jokes as you want but if the viewers don't care about the story and/or the characters involved, it will never really work. Still, it remains an entertaining comedy and I think it is worth a look, especially if you loved 'A fish called Wanda'.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 17 January 2012 08:59 (A review of Captivity)

I didn't expect much before watching this damned thing and, indeed, it turned out to be  nothing great. It's a sad thing that such a fine director like Roland Joffé would end up directing such a generic horror flick. Furthermore, I’m really getting fed up with this whole torture porn hype. Seriously, it is such a boring and uninteresting genre.... Anyway, coming back to our main feature, it was a really weak 'Saw' copycat with an omnipotent serial killer who sees and hears everything and who seems to have an illimitated budget and no day job whatsoever. To be honest, I always had a hard time to believe such a premise but, here, it was even more difficult than usual. I mean, usually, I never cared about the usual twist at the end but, this time around, I figured out right from  the start and the end-result was just rather weird. Indeed, if you are in captivity, with a strange guy, you might maybe end up having a close relationship with him, to kiss him would be already  a stretch, but do you really think that you would have sex with this guy, when you just have been tortured and when a psycho is filming the whole thing?!? I really I don't think so .... Anyway, to conclude, it was a really weak horror flick and I don’t think it is worth a look at all. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 16 January 2012 02:34 (A review of Ladder 49)

Honestly, before watching this, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was starring John Travolta and Joaquin Phoenix, I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, it ended up being the best movie about the subject I have ever seen. I mean, it is not like any I have seen 1000's movies about firefighters and it doesn't mean it is a masterpiece but I thought the whole thing was pretty entertaining but still rather realistic. John Travolta gave, as usual, a decent performance and Joaquin Phoenix was just impressive (thank God he dropped the whole retirement-I-wanna-be-a-rapper thing!). I know it is not a really popular flick but I think it is actually rather underrated. Of course, the story is nothing mind-blowing whatsoever and it is actually rather predictable but they managed to make me care about these characters and what was happening to them. Eventually, even though it is not a masterpiece, it remains a well made and entertaining flick and, in my opinion, it is definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 16 January 2012 02:22 (A review of I Love You, Man)

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I thought I should check it out. First of all, to be honest, in my opinion, the concept was actually pretty lame when you think about it and the whole thing could have been pretty average (like, for example, 'Made of Honor'). Eventually, in spite this weak concept, I have to admit that they still managed to deliver a rather enjoyable comedy. Indeed, the whole thing turned to be actually quite entertaining, above all thanks to the characters which very well written and also well played by Paul Rudd and Jason Segel. I mean, during the whole thing I was expecting that something really weird or annoying would happen concerning Segel's character but, fortunately, it never happened. Indeed, these 2 guys just happened to have a great connection, even though they were quite different from each other and their relationship was just really genuine and believable. As a side note, I must say that the couple Jon Favreau-Jaime Pressly was just hilarious as well. To conclude, even though the whole concept was actually not really good at all, the characters were very well written and played that I still enjoyed the damned thing and, in my opinion, it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 15 January 2012 02:07 (A review of Obsessed)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. Indeed, I didn’t expect much from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. Well, Beyoncé is easily one of the biggest stars nowadays and it is not really surprising that, at some point, she would try to launch some kind of movie career on the side. This time, she went for a thriller and, honestly, I wasn't really impressed. Indeed, it was a really generic feature involving a jealous woman who doesn't get what she wants with a married man and goes psycho on the married couple. I mean, this kind of story has been done so many times before and way better than here. I have to admit that the directing and the acting were not really bad actually but they didn't add anything original to the formula and, honestly, the whole thing was rather boring to watch. Anyway, to conclude, it was a rather tedious and generic thriller and it is not really worth a look, except maybe if you are a die hard fan of Beyoncé.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 15 January 2012 01:26 (A review of The Visitor)

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Furthermore, ever since I saw Richard Jenkins in 'Six Feet Under', I always had a weak spot for him and it was pretty neat so him playing the lead for once. Op top of that, in the process, he even received Oscar nomination which was completely deserverd. Still, I must admit that it took me a while to get into this story though. I mean, Jenkins and all the other actors involved were really good but I didn't really care much about the story or the characters. Still, thanks to the solid acting, it still worked fine. Furthermore, even though the story was not really original, it was still an interesting reflection on the status of the immigrants in the USA and on the impact it has on an American citizen who didn't care about anything anymore.  Concerning Tom McCarthy, by now, I have seen all his directing efforts (except ‘The Cobbler’ which sounds rather dreadful) but, , to be honest, I thought they were all slightly overrated, even ‘Spotlight’ which managed at the time to win the Best Picture Academy Award. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even though it didn’t really blow me away, it was still a decent watch, if only for Richard Jenkins’s performance and I think it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 15 January 2012 11:39 (A review of The Gathering)

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this movie and the only reason I watched the damned thing was that I have a weak spot for Christina Ricci. Unfortunately, a part from her, the whole thing was nothing really mind-blowing, I'm afraid. Indeed, basically, it was one of those typical thrillers which builds some mystery at the beginning and, I must admit, I was rather intrigued by the whole thing. Unfortunately, as it is always the same issue with this kind of movies, at some point, sooner or later, they will have to explain what's going on and they will always come up with the most preposterous supernatural explanation. Of course, this movie was not an exception. I know, I shouldn't ask such a movie to be realistic but, at least, even if they provide the weirdest explanation, it should always be entertaining and it wasn't really the case here, that's for sure. To be honest, the directing was not bad, the acting was not bad either but I honestly couldn't care less about the story. To conclude, it was just a really average paranormal thriller and it is not really worth a look in my opinion.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 15 January 2012 11:01 (A review of An American Werewolf in London)

We don't hear much from John Landis nowadays but, back in the 80's, he was quite a successful director and one of his biggest success was this werewolf flick which has now reached a cult status. First of all, to mix comedy and horror is a tricky challenge and most movies usually fail miserably but Landis did a good job here and sometimes you might wonder if you should be laughing or be horrified by the whole thing. Still, I must say, like most of the movies in this genre, it did take forever until the main character finally became a werewolf. But, honestly, the end result was quite impressive. Indeed, back in those days, they didn't have any CGI but only some awesome make-up and it still stands up fine 30 years later. Unfortunately, it was also an issue with this flick. Indeed, basically, the make-up was so impressive that it did upstage the whole story as a result. Furthermore, considering the story itself, sure, it was entertaining enough but it was nothing really amazing. On top of that, it was rather silly that the doctor would run her own investigation and, even though Jenny Agutter was really lovely, I thought it was rather unbelievable that a nurse would bring home a patient to have some hot sex with him. Anyway, to conclude, even though I think it is in fact slighly overrated, it remains a classic and a very entertaining werewolf flick and it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 14 January 2012 01:18 (A review of The Darkest Hour)

For almost 10 years, almost every month, I went to the movie theater with Nick, my step-son. Traditionally, I have always been the one suggesting the movies that we should watch and we would take the final decision together but, for the first time, he made the suggestion and chose this movie. To be honest, I had actually not heard anything about this movie but it made the whole thing even more appealing. Unfortunately, even though I'm a sucker for this genre, it turned out to be a really weak apocalyptic thriller which didn't add anything interesting to the formula. Above all, I thought it was so sad to see Emile Hirsch in such an underwhelming feature. Seriously, what the hell happened to this guy?!? Indeed, 5 years before, he showed up in 'Into the Wild' and, even before this movie, he was easily one of the most promising actors around but, nowadays, I don't hear much from him anymore and, with such disappointing flicks, it won't get better anytime soon. Furthermore, even though Nick was rather fascinated by the aliens and their 'electric' behaviour, to be honest, I didn’t think it was anything really interesting. Anyway, to conclude, even though I was seen worse movies,  it was still a weak and boring SF flick and it is not really worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry