Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7713) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 30 December 2011 08:50 (A review of Hachi: A Dog's Tale)

Since this movie seemed to have a really solid reputation (it has an impressive 8.1 rating on IMDB and it is even listed in the IMDB 250 Top Rated movies) and since I always had a weak spot for Lasse Hallstrom’s work, I was really eager to check it out. Eventually, I wish I saw the damned thing with my wife. Indeed, since we are together, she has bought 10 dogs and we still have 6 of them right now but I never managed to convince her to watch this movie because she was afraid it would be too emotional for her. Anyway, I must admit that it was a touching story, the directing by Hallstrom was pretty good as usual and Richard Gere gave a decent performance. However, even though the whole thing was touching, I’m sorry, but I didn’t think it was anything really mind-blowing whatsoever. It was also rather annoying to see all these people having some conversations with that dog. At least, they didn't make the dog answer them which would have been pretty awfull but I still thought it was rather ridiculous. I guess without this gimmick there wouldn't have been any dialogues during the whole thing. Anyway, even thoug it didn’t really blow me away, I have to admit it, it was a well made drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 29 December 2011 12:37 (A review of Strayed)

Since I have a weak for AndrĂ© TĂ©chiné’s work, I though I should check this flick. TĂ©chinĂ© is actually not really famous here on Listal but he is actually one of the best living French directors. He usually makes some contemporary features but, this time, he has directed an intriguing World War II drama. It stars Emmanuelle BĂ©art, an established French movie star, and Gaspard Ulliel, an upcoming young actor who would eventually end up playing the younger version of Hannibal Lecter in 'Hannibal rising' (Has he done anything else in Hollywood since then? I don’t think so. Too bad since he is a pretty talented fellow). Basically, it is one those intimate dramas with a very few characters but thanks to BĂ©art and Ulliel's strong performances, it did work very well. To be honest, the plot was actually not really mind-blowing but it was interesting enough, and, as I said before, they both gave some decent performances and I really enjoyed the sober directing by TĂ©chinĂ© as well. To conclude, it is a rather small scaled drama taking place during WWII but it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years ago on 29 December 2011 11:37 (A review of The Wizard of Oz)

Since this movie is such a huge classic, of course, I really had to watch it at some point. Eventually, it did really live up to its reputation as it was really a magical movie with a huge budget for that time. Indeed, the decors, the costumes, the special effects, the switch from black and white to colour, it all looked pretty awesome. Even though I have never been a huge of musicals, the songs were decent enough and I was even familiar with some of them, even before watching this flick, which shows of how influential this movie has always been. Still, even if I did admire the work done, I can’t say I was really blown away by the damned thing. On one hand, the whole thing was probably slightly too sugercoated for my taste and maybe I would have enjoyed it more if I had watched it back then when I was a kid. On the other hand, I guess it is just a matter of taste and the fact that I always had a hard time to care for this genre might explain that I wasn’t really impressed by this movie. Anyway, to conclude, it remains a huge classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are a fan of the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 29 December 2011 10:15 (A review of Romancing the Stone)

For Robert Zemeckis, this movie is pretty much where it all really started and when I was kid, I always had a weak spot for this flick. Since I hadn’t see it for years, I thought it was time for a re-watch, I watched it this time with my step-son and, 30 years later, it actually still holds up pretty good. I mean, it could have been a lazy Indiana Jones copycat but they succeeded in including enough new elements to make it fun and entertaining to watch. First of all, Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner had some awesome chemistry and they made up a great duo (they would eventually make 2 more movies together). It was also a nice reminder that Michael Douglas is actually a pretty good actor and is actually able to play something else than his usual arrogant rich SOB. Personally, I thought that the first half was just hilarious with Turner giving a typical fish-out-of-water performance and Douglas portraying an adventurer who is even less heroic than Indiana Jones. I must say that during the second half the whole tends to lose some steam but the whole thing was still enjoyable to watch. To conclude, it is a real classic from the 80's and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you liked the Indiana Jones flicks like I do.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 10:19 (A review of The Cat's Meow)

To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast, I thought I should give it a try. You may have never heard of Peter Bogdanovich but he was actually one of the American directors that emerged in the 70’s and after ‘The Last Picture Show’, many thought he would become a major player. Eventually, it never happened and this movie was actually the last one directed by Bogdanovich. So, like I said before, back in the 70's, he was one of the hottest directors at work in the USA. Unfortunately, he never really fulfilled those expectations, I'm afraid. Anyway, this feature which is one of his most recent directing efforts didn't really impress me at all. It was supposed to be more or less representing the golden age of Hollywood in the 20's but, honestly, it didn't care at all for those characters and I was honestly bored by the whole thing. Kirsten Dunst was quite charming, as usual, and she delivered a decent performance but I thought that all those characters were rather obnoxious and they didn't have much interesting things to tell. I mean, I couldn't care less even for Charlie Chaplin who I actually really idolize! Anyway, to conclude, I have seen worse movies and the whole thing was rather well made, but they never succeeded at making it interesting at all, so it was a rather boring movie and I don't think it is really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 10:00 (A review of 71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance)

Since I'm a huge fan of Michael Haneke, I was really eager to check this flick and, as usual, Haneke didn't disappoint me. In fact, it was interesting to see how similar this movie was to 'Elephant', a movie directed 10 years later by Gus van Sant. Indeed, the subject was similar and they both took the same approach to display the events without explaining them. The big difference was that Haneke had chosen to display the different characters who would be eventually involved in this tragedy. I must admit that I was wondering where the whole thing was going but it became really clear at the end. It was also a rather depressing movie to watch since all the characters were so sad and no one of them seemed to live a happy life at all. Maybe Haneke wanted to display that in our modern age, ruled by computers and televisions, it has become really difficult to connect with a one and another and, some of us who can’t cope anymore, chose to end it all in some kind of mayhem. Of course, it is a personal theory and I might have missed the point entirely. Anyway, pretty much like all Haneke's features, it remains an acquired taste but I really liked it and it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 09:21 (A review of Cat People (1942))

Since this movie was included in the ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’ list, I was really eager to check it out. First of all, when you watch this flick, you have to keep in mind that you are actually watching one of the first ancestors of our contemporary horror movies and it was pretty neat to see how much have changed in 70 years. Back then, there was basically no sex, no blood, in fact, to be honest,  nothing much happened during the whole thing when you think about it. Pretty muck like today, they made this choice mostly because they basically had no money but it made the whole thing even more effective. There was indeed constantly this eerie atmosphere which was not really frightening but it still made me uneasy throughout the whole duration. To show the impact of this flick, you should know that the horror movie technique of slowly building tension to a jarring shock which turns out to be something completely harmless is actually called a ‘Lewton bus’ after a famous scene from this movie. How amazing is that? Anyway, to conclude, even though it didn’t grow old very well, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A surprising movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 08:17 (A review of Puss in Boots)

To be honest, before watching the damned thing, I have to admit that I had some rather had low expectations. In fact, it was quite understandable since 'Shrek the Third' and 'Shrek Forever After' turned out to be both really disappointing. However, against all my expectations, this spin-off turned out be actually quite enjoyable. In my opinion, the masterstroke was that they managed to come up with an entertaining adventure and, instead of copying Shrek's world, they provided a mix of tale with a zorro-like universe. Furthermore, there were some really colorfull characters involved and Puss in Boots was great as lead character. On a side note, I'm glad I was actually able to convince my step-son to watch this flick in English (so far, we used to watch animated features in Dutch which is his mother-tongue). Indeed, Antonio Banderas really rocked the voice-over and the guy was just hilarious. In the second half, the plot did drag on but I was still entertained throughout the whole thing. Of course, as usual, the 3D didn’t bother me but the damned thing was still completely unnecessary. Anyway, to conclude, even though it seemed to be a cash-in (it was still a cash-in though), it was after all a fun animated flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like this genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 December 2011 10:18 (A review of The Fox and the Child)

Back in those days, we used to have a dvd shop where you could rent dvds but it is now long gone (as a matter of fact, 3 other shops selling dvds are also closed down recently and there is only one remaining nearby... What I am supposed to do then?!?). Anyway, at some point, there was not much else to watch with the kids, so I picked this one up even though I had no idea if it was any good. Usually, I'm not a real fan of kids flicks in general. In my opinion, those movies don't take children seriously and are just way too moronic. Still, there are a few exceptions and this movie is a good example. Indeed, it was a interesting mix of a documentary and a children movie and ,basically, it focuses on a fox and there were so pretty awesome shots. To be honest, I must say the plot was obviously targeted towards young children so I can't say it was really entertaining whatsoever but, still, at the end, it remains a charming and innocent family feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you have young children, for them, it will be a real treat, something really original that they probably have never seen before.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 December 2011 09:51 (A review of Burn After Reading)

Following their oscar winning flick, 'No Country for old men', the Coen brothers made this lighter comedy. First of all, there was a really top cast (George Clooney, Frances McDormand, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Tilda Swinton, Richard Jenkins, J.K. Simmons) and they were all pretty good. I must say, even though the premise sounded really awesome, the end-result was pretty funny but nothing more than that. It was nice to see Brad Pitt playing with his image, being a goofball and all, but they didn't do much with it and that was about the same thing with the other characters. In my opinion, the best scenes were eventually the one involving J.K. Simmons and his colleague in the CIA office. Those scenes were just freaking hilarious. I guess it all depends what is the relationship you have with the Coen brothers, if you are fan of them, you will enjoy this flick, and if you don't like their style, you will probably think it is nothing special. To conclude, even though it is definitely a minor movie in the Coen brothers' prestigious filmography, I thought it was pretty good, I enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you liked their previous work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry