Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7698) - TV Shows (10)

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 10:00 (A review of 71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance)

Since I'm a huge fan of Michael Haneke, I was really eager to check this flick and, as usual, Haneke didn't disappoint me. In fact, it was interesting to see how similar this movie was to 'Elephant', a movie directed 10 years later by Gus van Sant. Indeed, the subject was similar and they both took the same approach to display the events without explaining them. The big difference was that Haneke had chosen to display the different characters who would be eventually involved in this tragedy. I must admit that I was wondering where the whole thing was going but it became really clear at the end. It was also a rather depressing movie to watch since all the characters were so sad and no one of them seemed to live a happy life at all. Maybe Haneke wanted to display that in our modern age, ruled by computers and televisions, it has become really difficult to connect with a one and another and, some of us who can’t cope anymore, chose to end it all in some kind of mayhem. Of course, it is a personal theory and I might have missed the point entirely. Anyway, pretty much like all Haneke's features, it remains an acquired taste but I really liked it and it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 09:21 (A review of Cat People (1942))

Since this movie was included in the ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’ list, I was really eager to check it out. First of all, when you watch this flick, you have to keep in mind that you are actually watching one of the first ancestors of our contemporary horror movies and it was pretty neat to see how much have changed in 70 years. Back then, there was basically no sex, no blood, in fact, to be honest,  nothing much happened during the whole thing when you think about it. Pretty muck like today, they made this choice mostly because they basically had no money but it made the whole thing even more effective. There was indeed constantly this eerie atmosphere which was not really frightening but it still made me uneasy throughout the whole duration. To show the impact of this flick, you should know that the horror movie technique of slowly building tension to a jarring shock which turns out to be something completely harmless is actually called a ‘Lewton bus’ after a famous scene from this movie. How amazing is that? Anyway, to conclude, even though it didn’t grow old very well, it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A surprising movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 28 December 2011 08:17 (A review of Puss in Boots)

To be honest, before watching the damned thing, I have to admit that I had some rather had low expectations. In fact, it was quite understandable since 'Shrek the Third' and 'Shrek Forever After' turned out to be both really disappointing. However, against all my expectations, this spin-off turned out be actually quite enjoyable. In my opinion, the masterstroke was that they managed to come up with an entertaining adventure and, instead of copying Shrek's world, they provided a mix of tale with a zorro-like universe. Furthermore, there were some really colorfull characters involved and Puss in Boots was great as lead character. On a side note, I'm glad I was actually able to convince my step-son to watch this flick in English (so far, we used to watch animated features in Dutch which is his mother-tongue). Indeed, Antonio Banderas really rocked the voice-over and the guy was just hilarious. In the second half, the plot did drag on but I was still entertained throughout the whole thing. Of course, as usual, the 3D didn’t bother me but the damned thing was still completely unnecessary. Anyway, to conclude, even though it seemed to be a cash-in (it was still a cash-in though), it was after all a fun animated flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like this genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 27 December 2011 10:18 (A review of The Fox and the Child)

Back in those days, we used to have a dvd shop where you could rent dvds but it is now long gone (as a matter of fact, 3 other shops selling dvds are also closed down recently and there is only one remaining nearby... What I am supposed to do then?!?). Anyway, at some point, there was not much else to watch with the kids, so I picked this one up even though I had no idea if it was any good. Usually, I'm not a real fan of kids flicks in general. In my opinion, those movies don't take children seriously and are just way too moronic. Still, there are a few exceptions and this movie is a good example. Indeed, it was a interesting mix of a documentary and a children movie and ,basically, it focuses on a fox and there were so pretty awesome shots. To be honest, I must say the plot was obviously targeted towards young children so I can't say it was really entertaining whatsoever but, still, at the end, it remains a charming and innocent family feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you have young children, for them, it will be a real treat, something really original that they probably have never seen before.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 December 2011 09:51 (A review of Burn After Reading)

Following their oscar winning flick, 'No Country for old men', the Coen brothers made this lighter comedy. First of all, there was a really top cast (George Clooney, Frances McDormand, Brad Pitt, John Malkovich, Tilda Swinton, Richard Jenkins, J.K. Simmons) and they were all pretty good. I must say, even though the premise sounded really awesome, the end-result was pretty funny but nothing more than that. It was nice to see Brad Pitt playing with his image, being a goofball and all, but they didn't do much with it and that was about the same thing with the other characters. In my opinion, the best scenes were eventually the one involving J.K. Simmons and his colleague in the CIA office. Those scenes were just freaking hilarious. I guess it all depends what is the relationship you have with the Coen brothers, if you are fan of them, you will enjoy this flick, and if you don't like their style, you will probably think it is nothing special. To conclude, even though it is definitely a minor movie in the Coen brothers' prestigious filmography, I thought it was pretty good, I enjoyed it and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you liked their previous work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 26 December 2011 09:32 (A review of Four Christmases)

When was the last time we saw a good movie starring Vince Vaughn ? Seriously, this movie was already his second Christmas feature and, even though it was not as bad as 'Fred Claus', it was still pretty damned average. In fact, Vaughn himself was actually not so bad and Reese Witherspoon was charming as usual but neither of them was actually funny and since I was watching a comedy, it was definitely a big issue. Furthermore, there was a really neat supporting cast (Robert Duvall, Sissy Spacek, Jon Voight, Jon Favreau, Mary Steenburgen, Dwight Yoakam, Tim McGraw, Kristin Chenoweth,…) but they all played some tedious characters so the whole thing felt like a big waste of talented actors.  I have to admit it, there were a few good scenes here and there and I did laugh a couple of times but there were also so many bad jokes, those jokes were even mean sometimes and it made the whole thing rather painfull to watch. Above all, the plot was just really generic and predictable. To conclude, even though it wasn’t the worse movie starring Vince Vaughn I have seen,  it was still pretty weak though and it is not really worth a look whatsoever, even if you are desperate to watch a Christmas flick.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 25 December 2011 11:58 (A review of Beverly Hills Cop III)

To be honest, I have never been a fan of this franchise. Actually, I didn´t even really like the first one which is considered a classic. I mean, I thought it was not bad but still nothing mind-blowing whatsoever. As a matter of fact, my favorite would be actually the action packed sequel directed by Tony Scott. Anyway, seven years later, of course, they decided to make it a trilogy and, for the occasion, they reunited Eddie Murphy with John Landis. Indeed, back in the 80´s, they made together ´Trading places´ which is one of the few classics starring Eddie Murphy that I really enjoyed. Anyway, Murphy and Landis were back together but I´m afraid the end-result was more than disappointing. Indeed, John Landis is quite awesome with comedy but action-comedy is a rather different style which he obviously doesn´t really manage. Furthermore, the plot was just so generic and, honestly, I was bored to death by the whole thing. In my opinion, the whole concept of the Beverly Hills cop was rather weak from the start and with this 3rd flick, it was even more obvious. To conclude, even though it is not the worse movie starring Eddie Murphy (it doesn´t say much, I know...), it is still a worthless sequel and it is not worth a look whatsover.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An underrated movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 24 December 2011 08:44 (A review of Daylight )

Honestly, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Sylvester Stallone, I thought I should give it a try. Back then, at the end of the 90's, Stallone's career was not doing so well and, indeed, most of his movies were pretty average and usually flopped at the box-office. So, considering this, I had some rather low expectations before watching this flick. Eventually, I must say I was actually pleasantly surprised. I mean, it is not a masterpiece or anything like this but it is in fact easily one of the most entertaining movies starring Stallone I have seen for many years. First of all, there was a decent cast (Sylvester Stallone, Amy Brenneman, Viggo Mortensen, Dan Hedaya) and even Stallone managed to give a decent performance. On top of that, the actions were pretty spectacular and, for once, the whole thing was not completely preposterous. So, against all expectations, you had here a decent plot, some cool actions scenes and some convincing actors. To conclude, it is a rather unknown and underrated action flick but I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Sylvester Stallone's work.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 24 December 2011 08:20 (A review of If Lucy Fell)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. To be honest, I didn't expect much from the damned thing and, indeed, it was one of those quirky indie romantic comedies with a ridiculous premise (this time, the big idea was that, if they don't fall in love within 28 days, they will kill themselves…). On the positive side, I must say that Eric Schaeffer was not bad at all and his character was the only thing I actually enjoyed, even though his obsession with his neighbour was rather annoying and ridiculous. Sarah Jessica Parker, before becoming Carrie Bradshaw for ever, was not bad actually but I couldn't stand her character who was so obnoxious and condescending. You also had Ben Stiller showing up in one of his clueless characters but I never thought his gimmick was really funny whatsoever. To conclude, the whole thing was pretty weak and without Schaeffer, I would have given it an even lower rating. Anyway, it is not really worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years ago on 23 December 2011 10:05 (A review of Æon Flux)

Even though I heard only bad things about this flick, since I have weak spot for Charlize Theron, I still wanted to check it out. First of all, following her Oscar winning turn in 'Monster', Charlize Theron chose to do something completely different and she should be praised for that. And indeed, this flick really had some potential. There was a great cast (Charlize Theron , Jonny Lee Miller, Sophie Okonedo, Frances McDormand, Pete Postlethwaite) and they managed to create a rather fascinating world but still, the whole thing didn't work. The biggest issue was that the plot was so generic and disposable, it made the whole thing rather boring to watch. I think their big mistake was that they tried too much to rationalize this futuristic world. Indeed, that was just one of the qualities of the original MTV cartoon : the cloak of mystery surrounding this fascinating world. After removing it, it made even less sense and the whole thing became rather ridiculous and pointless. Anyway, to conclude, I have seen worse movies, there were even some good stuff here but, eventually, it remains a disappointing flick and it is not really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry