A good movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/881/1873881.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
An average movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/122/4181122.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was starring Bridget Fonda and Kiefer Sutherland, I thought I should give it a try. Well, it bascally started like a rather standard domestic violence related thriller but it got really weird fairly quick. Indeed, you had a deaf woman, her weird crazy mother, two dead bodies, some lost cash and a dog which didn’t add anything to the plot. So, it was definitely a rather strange flick and I have to admit that I was on the edge of my seat during the whole thing wondering what would happen next. Unfortunately, the directing and the acting were just really weak and some of the scenes were rather stupid. I mean, the two (!) scenes during which the main character stole a car were just so ridiculous and there were many more scenes which didn't make much sense either. Still, I couldn't help thinking that a (good) director such as David Lynch could have created a pretty neat dark tale with this material, but it wasn't meant to be, I’m afraid. Anyway, to conclude, even though the damned thing had some potential, it was rather average and, eventually, not really worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
A good movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/136/25208136.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Since I really enjoyed 'Letters to Iwo Jima', I was really eager to watch this flick. Together, they make one of the best depiction of war I have ever seen and it is quite impressive when you think that Clint Eastwood had never made a war movie before. I mean, the battle scenes were really horrific and some of the best I have seen, it almost reached the level of the introduction of 'Saving Private Ryan'. Still, I have to admit that this movie was not as successful as 'Letters to Iwo Jima' was. First of all, in my opinion, the young soldiers were rather miscast, they were either too old (like Ryan Philippe and Paul Walker) or just not good enough (like Jesse Bradford, Adam Beach, Joseph Cross and Scott Eastwood). Furthermore, even though the whole story about the raising of the Flag was interesting, it wasn't really spellbinding, especially compared to the battle itself and I wish they just followed the same story used in 'Letters to Iwo Jima' but dealing with the American side this time around. Eventually, even though 'Letters to Iwo Jima' would be nominated for the Academy Award for the Best Picture, this movie would be ignored but I think it was deserved since it wasn't really amazing. Still, it remains a well made war movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Clint Eastwood's work.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
An average movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/056/14185056.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
To be honest, it is a really obscure feature (I was in fact the very first Listal member who has rated the damned thing). Indeed, I had never heard about this flick before but since I have a weak spot for Connie Nielsen, I thought I should check it out. Eventually, I must admit that it was not bad at all after all. Basically, it was one of those typical dramas about an orphan looking for a new home. At first, there was some difficulty but then, they just got along fine and at the end, there was of course an obligatory dramatic climax to supposedly keep you on the edge of your seat. You know the drill... So, it was nothing really original and actually quite predictable but I thought it was rather well made and well acted so I must admit that I did care for the characters. Still, why on Earth would they choose a Danish actress to portray an Irish woman ?!? I mean, Connie Nielsen was fine here but there was actually no reason why she should have this part instead of a fine Irish actress. To conclude, all in all, it was a typical drama but I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
An average movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/038/230038.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
A good movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/086/150086.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
[Link removed - login to see]For some reasons, I was really eager to watch this movie and it took me about 6 years to finally find it. Indeed, since I have been playing the saxophone alt for maybe 8 years, I obviously really had to check it out. In fact, I did study Charlie Parker's music and it was basically the most difficult thing you could play on a sax. Indeed, even if I would play it 10 times slower than him, it was still really really difficult to handle! Anyway, back to the movie... The music was indeed just awesome and Clint Eastwood really succeeded to show it in all its greatness. Forest Whitaker also gave here his first starring part and he gave many layers to this character. Indeed, you could feel the genius but also all the vulnerability and you also got a good feeling of his demons. Another interesting thing was that, even though Charlie Parker constantly talked about his addiction, you actually never saw him shooting drugs and there was only one scene during which he displayed his tracks on his arm. I think it was actually a very sensitive approach and even though he was a heavy drug addict, it was more interesting to watch him playing his magical music than taking some dope like any other musical biopic. However, even though I really enjoyed this flick, unfortunately, it was still flawed. Indeed, even though the back and forth in the timeline was chosen more or less there to display his confused state of mind, I still thought it was a rather annoying and useless gimmick. Another consequence of this approach was that it was difficult to understand the impact of the other characters in his life. Anyway, in spite of these flaws, it was still a really interesting movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Jazz.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
A very good movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/541/21859541.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
An average movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/484/1095484.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
An average movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/953/1153953.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since my wife was really eager to watch it, I thought I should give it a try. Unfortunately, it turned out to be really average. It’s too bad because I think it actually had some potential. Basically, it was about a woman going into a middle-life crisis and she decides to travel to 3 different countries during a year. It does sound pretty neat, doesn't it? However, the whole thing turned out to be surprisingly dull. In fact, it reminded me of 'American Beauty'. In this great flick, the main character, when facing middle-life crisis, actually stays at home, smokes some weed, and goes to work for a fast-food chain. It did sound dull but it turned out to be just so fascinating to watch. In this movie, it was just the opposite. Travelling around the world sounds and should be damned exciting but it wasn't because none of the characters involved was really interesting and when you have such a supporting cast including Billy Crudup, James Franco, Javier Bardem and Richard Jenkins, it is a damned shame. Eventually, the most annoying character was the main character portrayed by Julia Roberts. I mean, there was not a moment into the whole movie during which I could identify with her and it had nothing to do with the fact that she was a womand and I am a man. Furthermore, the 3 exotic location were really poorly used as they just looked like some postcards and all the locals were so stereotypically portrayed, it was just really annoying to watch. To conclude, I was seen worse movies but it was still really weak and eventually, it is not really worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
A very good movie
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/468/22375468.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Since I'm a huge fan of Neil Jordan, I was really eager to check out this movie. First of all, to be honest, I have to admit that it had been a while since this director really blew me away with one of this movies. Fortunately, I was eventually pleasantly surprised by this flick. Basically, it was one of those movies where a man and a woman are stuck together against their will but, eventually, they get some connection. The difference here was that the characters were so well written and played, they were quite fascinating to watch. Furthermore, I really enjoyed the directing providing precisely the right amount of humor, drama, romance and suspense. Of course, the fact that Michael Caine had a small part didn't hurt either as he once again gave another strong performance. Bob Hoskins, for once playing the lead, was also really good here. Eventually, the whole thing turned out to be a simple tale but it was very well told and just plain entertaining. To conclude, even though it is rather forgotten nowadays, I really liked the damned thing and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Neil Jordan's work.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)