
Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 8 January 2012 10:37
(A review of
Terug naar de kust)
The funny thing with this movie is that I cannot remember why I actually wanted to watch the damned thing, except maybe because I thought that my wife might be interested. Anyway, it was starring Linda de Mol who is a famous TV host in the Netherlands and, even though I wasn't expecting much from her performance, eventually, I have to admit that she wasn't bad at all after all. Still, even though the acting was decent, it was still nothing mindblowing and it was the same thing concerning the directing. On the positive side, the story was quite intriguing even if there was probably too many characters and too many subplots involved. Still, since you are never sure what to think of all those chararacters, you stay on the edge of your seat during the whole duration. However, it was pretty obvious that there were something wrong with the sister, from the moment she gave the first pill. I mean, if someone gives you a pill and the day after you wake up with some blood and bruises on your face, then you might wonder what kind of pill it was.... Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing mindblowing, I thought it was a decent thriller and it is actually worth a look, especially if you are interested in Dutch movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 7 January 2012 01:31
(A review of
Hardwired)
Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example and the only reason I watched it was because it was starring Val Kilmer. By the way, what happened to this guy?!!? Indeed, back in the 90's, he was on the A list but nowadays, he makes about 6 movies a year and most of them are some rather worthless direct-to-dvd releases like this movie. In fact, the original concept was not bad and it had some potential but the end-results was just pretty weak. Basically, they tried to make some kind of futuristic Bourne flick with some corporate conspiracy but a big issue was, that instead of Matt Damon, you had Cuba Gooding Jr. playing the Bourne part... Anyway, the directing was weak and the acting was not convincing whatsoever. To conclude, even though the whole thing did have some potential, it was just plain average and it is not worth a look whatsoever.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 7 January 2012 07:36
(A review of
Gun Shy)
Nowadays, Liam Neeson has made an interesting and surprising come-back as an action star thanks to 'Taken'. Anyway, I always thought he was a great actor able to do any genre of movies and I was rather curious to see him in a comedy. I must say that the concept (a DEA agent goes to a therapist after getting almost killed) was really awesome and Neeson had some good comic timing. To support him, there was the always funny, Oliver Plaat, and the always charming, Sandra Bullock so there was definitely some potential here. Unfortunately, the whole thing was rather disappointing. I mean, eventually, even though it indeed had some potential, the story was rather messy and, actually, not really funny and, as a result, I was actually rather bored by the whole thing. To conclude, I have seen worse movies but it was still pretty average and it is eventually not not really worth a look whatsoever, expect maybe if you are dying to see Liam Neeson in a comedy for a change.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 6 January 2012 08:14
(A review of
Nothing Like the Holidays)
Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example and I didn’t expect much before I watched the damned thing. Well, eventually, I have to admit that I was actually positively surprised. Sure, the story was rather generic and predictable but I thought it was actually rather well written and, above all, the performances were really good. Indeed, there was a nice cast (Alfred Molina, Freddy Rodríguez, Luis Guzmán, Jay Hernandez, John Leguizamo, Vanessa Ferlito, Debra Messins) and they were all pretty good. Thanks to them, I believed in those characters and cared for them. It’s too bad the story was not really strong and, when I saw the father answering the phone for the first time, I knew right away what was going on and the following misunderstandings were rather annoying and unnecessary. Still, in spite of these flaws, it was way better than I expected and I think it is actually worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 6 January 2012 08:45
(A review of
Cutthroat Island)
Way before ‘Pirates of the Carribean’, back in the 90's, Renny Harlin directed this big budget pirate movie. Eventually, it turned out to be a huge a flop, it was even listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the biggest box office flop of all time. The production company, Carolco Pictures, even went bankrupt after this disaster. Eventually, was it that bad? Not really actually. I mean, the costumes, the mood, the action scenes were all rather decent. The main issue is that the whole thing was unfortunately rather boring to watch. Indeed, it was too generic and predictable and the lack of exciting characters was really obvious. I mean, I have nothing against Geena Davis and Matthew Modine but they never managed to really excite me. It was actually a pretty neat idea to have a pirate movie with a female main character but the whole thing suffered from a terrible lack of inspiration. Eventually, almost 10 years later, with 'Pirates of the Carribean', they eventually got it right by hiring an awesome actor who was able to create a genuinely entertaining character, the legendary Captain Jack Sparrow. To conclude, this flick was not really bad but it was still pretty average and I don’t think it is really worth a look I’m afraid.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 6 January 2012 07:24
(A review of
De storm)
Ever since I have been living in the Netherlands, I have been interested in Dutch movies but, to be honest, most of them are actually rather disappointing. This movie was a fine example. Indeed, the storm of 1953 was the biggest natural disaster taking place in the Netherlands during the last century so it was not really a surprise that they finally decided to make a movie about this event. Unfortunately, even though there was definitely some potential to deliver something interesting, it turned out to be rather disappointing. Indeed, the first issue was that the acting and directing were pretty shabby. Furthermore, during the actual storm, the whole thing was also rather underwhelming. Then, slowly, the acting and directing got better but the main issue with this flick is that they didn't really manage to find a compelling story to tell around this disaster. I thought that, like many other disaster movies, they would focus on different characters and storylines but, actually, it was mostly about a mother looking for a baby. It was actually not a bad idea but the whole thing became then a rather unbelievable thriller with some really annoying twists. Anyway, to conclude, the end-result was half-baked but, still, if only for its historical value, it is actually worth a look, especially if you are interested in Dutch movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 5 January 2012 11:02
(A review of
No Good Deed)
To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since there was an interesting cast, I thought I should give it a try. Furthermore, there was a an interesting director on board. Indeed, back in the 70's, Bob Rafelson directed the instant classic 'Five Easy Pieces' starring Jack Nicholson and was promised a bright future. Unfortunately, 40 years later, his recent movies are not so impressive anymore. This flick is a good example. Indeed, you had a very nice cast (Samuel L. Jackson, Milla Jovovich, Stellan Skarsgård) and a good mood so the whole thing had some potential. However, there were some big issues with the story itself. I mean, they keep you in the dark as long as they can and, for a while, I must admit, it was rather intriguing, but, at some point, they eventually had to explain what was going on and, honestly, I wasn't impressed (understatement of the year...). As usual, they just threw a couple of annoying twists and then I really lost any interest in the whole endeavor. To conclude, I have seen worse movies but it was still a really half-baked thriller and it is not really worth a look, even if you love the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 5 January 2012 10:16
(A review of
Sixty Six)
Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example and the only reason I watched it was because it was starring Helena Bonham Carter. Indeed, between the Harry Potter franchise and the numerous Tim Burton flicks she made, she apparently still found some time to do something else. Concerning the damned thing itself, it was basically a quirky comedy dealing with some Jewish people living in England. For some reasons, I thought there were some weird similarities with 'The King's speech'. Indeed, the main character had asthma and was treated by this doctor played by Stephen Rea and you got some similar scenes during which they tried some exercises to help the young boy. But, like the rest of the variou sub-plots (the bar-mitzva, the World Cup, the father's shop,...), it was not very well developed. Furthermore, I didn't care much about any of the characters involved so I had hard time enjoying this feature which more sad than actually funny. At the end, there was a big switch in the tone and in father's behavior but it was finally uplifting and fun to watch. Anyway, to conclude, it was a rather unfocused but still well made comedy and it is actually worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 4 January 2012 12:34
(A review of
The Rookie)
Since I have a weak spot for Dennis Quaid, I thought I should check this one out, even though I didn't expect much from it. Basically, to enjoy this flick, it all depends where you stand towards sports movie. I mean, if you enjoy them, you wil love it and, if you cannot stand the genre, you won't like it much I'm afraid. The fact that is based on a true story doesn't change this whatsoever. Indeed, basically, it follows a very old formula and didn't add anything interesting to it. What remains is a pretty good performance by Dennis Quaid and some competent directing which managed to make the whole thing entertaining even though it was completely predictable. Personally, I'm not fan of this genre and I wish they spiced up the whole thing a little bit but since it is a Disney, what did I expect? Still, I have to admit, in this genre, it must be one of the best one I have seen so far (for example, with a similar plot, it was better than 'Invincible' which I have seen just recently). To conclude, even though it was quite generic, I still think it was a well made and entertaining sport flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are a fan of this genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 4 January 2012 12:20
(A review of
The Squid and the Whale)
Since I kept hearing some good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, eventually, it turned out to be one of those typical quirky indie movies dealing with a dysfunctional family. To be honest, at first, it took me a while to get into this story as none of the characters involved were actually likeable. Indeed, the 2 boys were pretty messed up, probably even before their parents divorced, and the parents were even worse, as they were really self-absorbed, egoistical and arrogant. Still, thanks to the directing and the actors involved, it was still pretty good. There was a terrific cast (Jeff Daniels, Laura Linney, Jesse Eisenberg, William Baldwin, Anna Paquin) and they all delivered some good performances, especially Jeff Daniels. Indeed, he is easily one of the most underrated actors at work nowadays. If you compare his performance in this movie, with his performances in 'Dumb & Dumber', 'State of play', 'The Purple rose of Cairo', you have here a very talented actor showing some impressive range. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was nothing mind-blowing in my opinion, it remains a well made and interesting drama and it is definitely worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry