![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/646/67646.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 21 November 2011 10:16
(A review of
Driven)
Watching a movie directed by Renny Harlin has always been a guilty pleasure of mine. Indeed, with this director, I already know before watching his movies that they won't be really good but I still watch them anyway because they still end up being entertaining somehow. This movie was a perfect example. Seriously, I don't know what was worse : the directing, the acting or the writing. I think I'm going to blame the writing though. Apparently, the screenplay was written by Stallone who really should stick to acting, even if he is not really such a great actor either. In my opinion, there were just way too many characters and too many subplots. On top of that, the dialogues were laughable and there were so many ridiculous scenes (when they 'stole' the cars and raced throughout downtown Chicago, when they stopped racing to save a fellow driver, when the rookie had to do a stupid test before driving with a broken foot and it went on and on like this...). Still, the driving scenes were not bad at all and the (many) crashes were quite spectacular. Actually, this racing world was quite fascinating, the whole project had some potential and they could have made something interesting with this material. Anyway, eventually, it was a really silly and ridiculous action flick but if you don't take it too seriously, it remains watchable but, honestly, I donāt think Ā it is really worth a look.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/874/24533874.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 2 months ago on 20 November 2011 08:11
(A review of
Last Holiday)
I have noticed that Wayne Wang is not a really famous director here in Listal or even in general but ever since I have seen 'Smoke' (which is a really awesome and underrated movie, you should definitely check it out if you haven't seen it yet), I always try to check his other movies when I have the chance. Here, he gave us a rather mainstream standard romantic comedy. First of all, to be honest, I have nothing against Queen Latifah but I don't think she is charismatic enough or simply a good actress enough to be the lead but I must admit that she was alright in this flick. On the other hand, the supporting actors were all pretty good, especially the great GĆ©rard Depardieu who really rocked his performance, as usual. It's really too bad that such a great actor doesn't get more opportunities to shine in some more interesting international productions than such fluffy features. To conclude, it remains a rather generic and predictable romantic-comedy but I still think it was very well made and the actors were all really charming, so I still think is actually worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/540/116540.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 19 November 2011 06:08
(A review of
The Good Night)
I had never heard of this movie but since it had a rather nice cast, I thought I should give it a shot. Well, it was basically one of these typical quirky indie comedies which tried rather awkwardly to mix 'Music and Lyrics' with 'Inception'. I know, it was a weird combination and, indeed, the movie didnāt turn out to be really convincing. One issue was that it was dealing with lucid dreaming which is a really fascinating subject but even though they wanted the viewers to take this subject seriousl, Ā the makers themselves didn't really handle the subject very well so it was a rather difficult to really care about the damned thing. For example, the main character decided to do some experiment and, Ā the very next day, without any practice whatsover, he was already able to do basically whatever he wanted while dreaming. I guess the lucid dreaming thing was not actually the main focus in this tale so I guess I shouldn't pay too much attention if it was accurate or not. Furthermore, I thought the whole cast was pretty neat (PenĆ©lope Cruz, Danny DeVito, Martin Freeman, Michael Gambon, Gwyneth Paltrow, Simon Pegg) and most of them delivered some solid performances. To conclude, even though it was rather flawed and even though the whole thing didn't really know if it should be a comedy or a drama, thanks to the cast involved, it was still worth a look though.Ā
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/357/1357.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 19 November 2011 07:24
(A review of
The Break-Up )
If I recall correctly, this movie was released back when Jennifer Anniston was recovering from her separation with Brad Pitt so the movie kind of surfed on this wave which does sounds pretty lame if you ask me. Anyway, I think Vince Vaughn is funny in general (at least, back in those days, it seems like ages since the last time I saw him in something funny or remotely entertaining) and he was pretty funny here. On the other hand, Anniston keeps playing the same character over and over and it is getting really annoying at this point. At least, Angelina Jolie tries different roles from time to time, maybe that's why Brad dumped her.... Anyway, let's get back on the movie, shall we? Even though they were an item back then, it was actually rather difficult to spot the chemistry between Vaughn and Anniston. Above all, the biggest issue was that you feel that the makers couldn't make up their mind if they should stay together or not. So, you have this constant annoying back-and-forth 'They love each other, they don't, they love each other, they don't...' but it didnāt have much to do with their actual feelings for each other, in fact, it had more to do with the fact that the makers wanted to keep the viewers on the edge during the whole thing and also with the fact that, actually, they just plain didn't know what do with those characters. Still in my opinion, it remains a rather well made romantic-comedy, Vaughn was funny, Anniston was charming and I was fairly entertained throughout the whole thing. To conclude, even though it is nothing mind-blowing, I still think it is worth look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/976/845976.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 18 November 2011 01:03
(A review of
For Queen and Country)
To be honest, I wasnāt sure what to expect from this flick but I'm a big fan of Denzel Washington and I think he is one of the most charismatic actors at work nowadays so I thought I should check this one out. This must be one of the most obscure flicks he has done before reaching fame and, I must say, it was not really good. I mean, the only critic I have against this guy, is that he always plays the same type of character and here, for once, he actually tried something completely different but, I must admist, he failed pretty miserably. Indeed, Washington tried to provide an English or an Irish accent but it is far from being convincing. Furthermore, I thought the directing was rather poor as well as they never managed to make the whole thing really appealing or entertaining. I have to admit, this movie and this plot had some potential and it could have been an interesting thriller/drama about the conflict in Northern Ireland but the end-result was rather average. To conclude, I thought it was a rather disappointing feature and I donāt think it is really worth a look, expect maybe if you are a die-hard fan of Denzel Washington.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/215/675215.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 18 November 2011 11:14
(A review of
Push)
Since this movie had a rather lame reputation, I didnāt expect much but, to be honest, I thougth it was not so bad at all. Basically, pretty much like 'Jumper' which was released a year before, they obviously tried to surf on the current super-hero wave but it didn't work out really well and the planned sequel was cancelled. Still, I actually liked the directing, the movie really looked good and Hong Kong was also a great location. Furthermore, the cast was all right and they all delivered some decent performances. Unfortunately, the story turned out to be really weak. Basically, it was some kind of mix of a little bit of 'Akira', a little bit of 'Total Recall' and lots of 'Heroes' but it was just really unfocused and plain average. There were also so many plot holes and, Ā as a result, it was sometimes rather difficult to make sense of the whole story. Eventually, it was just an average plot which happened to be really messy and it's too bad since the whole thing actually really had some potential. Anyway, to conclude, it was nothing mindblowing whatsoever but thanks to the interesting directing, the whole thing was still fairly entertaining and I still think is worth a look, especially if you like such brainless super-hero flicks.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/877/28352877.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 17 November 2011 12:45
(A review of
The World According to Garp)
Seriously, this movie must be one of the most disappointing features I have ever seen. I donāt know, since I kept hearing good things about this flick, I built up some rather huge expectations and it sure didnāt live up to those expectations. First of all, I haven't read the book so I have no clue if it is faithful or not. Secondly, to be honest, it wasnāt actually a bad movie, not all but I guess I was expecting something deep and meaningful but, eventually, I thought that the characters were rather annoying and not really interesting whatsoever. I mean, there was definitely some potential and I was intrigued by the whole thing but eventually, I couldn't help thinking that those characters were acting weird just for the sake of it and they were basically created to make you feel more or less uneasy. Seriously, I do like excentric and/or strange characters but I have to believe in them in some way but, with this story, they all seemed forced and rather artificial to me. Still, even though it was a let down, it still remains a well made feature seamlessly mixing drama and comedy with some good performances, especially by John Lithgow. Anywy, to conclude, even though I was expecting more, I guess it is still worth a look, but don't expect anything mind-blowing whatsoever like I did.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/549/1060549.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 17 November 2011 12:09
(A review of
Centurion)
What the hell happened to Neil Marshall?!? Indeed, back in those days, he was one Ā of the most promising British directors at work and he seemed to have a bright future ahead of him but, nowadays, we donāt hear much from him anymore. Itās too bad because the guy really had some skills and something I really like about his work was the fact that, with each movie, he tried something really different. This time around, he went for a peplum and I must say it, it was definitely his best looking movie so far. Indeed, I really liked the gritty look and you could see that there was no green screens involved which is a seriously overused gimmick nowadays. The fighting scenes were also pretty badass and rather bloody but it was something rather expected from Marshall. Furthemore, Michael Fassbender, Dominic West and Ulrich Thomsen all provided some solid performances, especially Fassbender who was already starting to become one of the most interesting actors around. Still, like most of Marshall's other features, the story was rather underwhelming. I mean, it was not really bad whatsoever, but it was just too pedestrian and it was never really thrilling. Anyway, to conclude, even though Ā it wasnāt really a great movie,Ā it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you enjoyed Neil Marshall's previous movies.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/495/6216495.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 17 November 2011 10:35
(A review of
Inkheart)
Nowadays, every time they try to adapt a fantasy novel, the studios involved always hope they will get the next huge franchise like Harry Potter. This, for example, was the first book of a trilogy but I guess we won't see the other books adapted anytime soon, Personally, I would blame Brendan Fraser, but that's me... I mean, the guy is just way too bland to be a lead acto but he still keeps getting starring roles and it just blows my mind. On the other hand, and this was the main reason why I wanted to watch this flick on the first place, there was a really neat supporting cast (Paul Bettany, Helen Mirren, Andy Serkis, Jennifer Connelly, Jim Broadbent) and they all delivered some solid performances. Concerning the story itself, it was at first rather boring and it took really too long to start. But then, finally, when they got to Capricorn's castle, it started to become a little bit more existing and this tale did work quite well then. To conclude, it was a rather standard fantasy feature with nothing really new or original but it was still fairly entertaining so I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
![](https://lthumb.lisimg.com/881/1873881.jpg?width=140&sharpen=true)
Posted : 13 years, 3 months ago on 16 November 2011 12:13
(A review of
Les Enfants Terribles)
To be honest, I had no idea if this movie was any good but since it was directed by Jean-Pierre Melville, one of the most highly regarded French directors,I thought I should check it out. I noticed that it is actually only later in his career that Melville made his great classics ('Le cercle rouge', 'LāarmĆ©e des ombres', 'Le samouraĆÆ') which I didn't have the pleasure to watch yet. This movie was actually something entirely different but it was indeed quite interesting to see how he started his career. Apparently, it is an adaptation of a book written by Jean Cocteau and I must say it was a rather weird flick. Indeed, there was no real plot, very few characters and the whole movie took place basically in one room. Still, I thought the whole thing was rather spellbinding to watch as the directing was very efficient and so was the acting. Above all, I thought that there was something quite fascinating about the characters. Eventually, during the whole thing, I couldn't make my mind if the whole thing was actually rather boring or quite spellbinding. To conclude, I think it is rather an acquired taste but I still think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in French movies.
![](https://i.listal.com/images/marseilles/chat_16.gif)
0 comments,
Reply to this entry