Reviews by johanlefourbe

To be honest, I wasn’t expecting much from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Matthew McConaughey, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, at the beginning of his career, McConaughey was involved in some interesting movies but, from the beginning of the 2000's, he kept getting typecast in such boring romantic-comedies and, from all these rom-coms, this was probably the worst one he made at the time. First of all, I thought he was actually really miscast for this movie. Indeed, the guy looked way too good, he was way too charming,  way too clever to be still living with his parents. Concerning Sarah Jessica Parker, I thought she was in fact also miscast. Indeed, in m opinion, they should have chosen a younger actress who really seemed irresistible. On top of that, it seems that Parker cannot get rid off of Carrie Bradshaw and she basically keeps playing this character over and over again in all her movies. On the positive side, I must say that the supporting cast was not bad (Justin Bartha, Bradley Cooper, Kathy Bates and, above all, Zooey Deschanel). Still, it was such a boring and predictable romantic-comedy with a really tedious plot and I don’t think it is really worth a look whatsoever.

To be honest, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but, even with some rather low expectations, the damned thing still turned out to be pretty disappointing. At least, I have to admit it, the special effects were pretty decent, the supporting actors did a pretty good job and Ben Stiller did his usual hysterical guy but he didn't really bother me. In fact, what really bothered me about this flick was the actual concept. I mean, I do love museas and I don't think that making the exhibits 'alive' would make the museas more interesting whatsoever. In fact, I think that the whole idea was actually rather insulting. Anyway, as a result, the whole thing was not really enjoyable to me and, to make things worse, I thought it was pretty boring. Eventually, I never understood the popularity of  this franchise. I mean, somehow, how they managed to deliver a trilogy with this concept is beyond me and the fact that all the instalments turned out to be failry successful at the box-office was just really unbelievable.  To conclude, I have seen worse movies but it was still a really weak family feature and it is not really worth a look.

I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was directed by Baz Luhrmann, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, before watching the damned thing, I kept hearing that this movie was supposed to be an Australian version of 'Gone with the Wind' but, in my opinion, it was in fact more an Australian version of 'Out of Africa' in my opinion. Anyway, what first bothered me was the fact it took them a very long time to find the right tone. Indeed, at the beginning of the movie, the whole thing was really over-the-top and rather comical to watch, but, then, slowly, it became more and more dramatic and even quite epic. And, indeed, you had here I all the basic elements of a good old epic : drama, romance, war, betrayal, murder, and even some some historical facts put here and there. There were also some nice shots and even though, Hugh Jackman and Nicole Kidman were not Robert Redford and Mery Streep, they still delivered some solid performances. To conclude, even if it was rather flawed and nothing really mind-blowing, I thought it was still an enjoyable and well made epic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.