Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7835) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 19 January 2012 06:11 (A review of Cypher (2002))

Since I'm a huge fan of 'Cube', I was really eager to watch this flick also directed by Vincenzo Natali. One again, it was a SF thriller but this time, they have added some industrial espionage to the mix. It was definitely an interesting combo and the beginning was indeed rather spellbinding. Indeed, they managed to create a fascinating world and I was never sure what was real and what I should believe. However, at some point, they tried to rationalize the whole thing, to explain what's going on and that's when they really lost me. Indeed, if the beginning was intriguing, the ending was messy, rather boring and far from being satisfactory. To be honest, I'm not sure if we should blame Jeremy Northam who gave a decent performance. Eventually, even though it really had some potential, the whole thing was eventually rather disappointing. To conclude, in my opinion, in spite its flaws, it remains an interesting SF flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you loved 'Cube' like I did.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 19 January 2012 04:02 (A review of The House Bunny)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. Indeed, I wasn't expecting much from the damned thing but I thought I should give it a try anyway. And, indeed, the whole concept was rather uninteresting and, honestly, not really funny at all. Above all, the whole thing was just badly written as, everytime you would see something interesting and 'touching' concerning the characters, they would immediatly show something really stupid or obnoxious about the same characters. You might really ask yourself if this movie was really a good career choice for Anna Faris who had already played the dumbest chick on earth already some many times for the 'Scary movie' franchise. Still, I think she is actually talented. I mean, the concept was worthless, her character was beyond awful and, still, thanks to her performance, I couldn't help thinking that maybe some of those playmates could be actually nice and friendly which was quite an achievement. Anyway, to conclude, even though the whole thing might have had actually some potential, it was still an average comedy and it is not really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 19 January 2012 02:55 (A review of Hook)

I must have been about 11 years old when this movie came out and, back then, it was in fact a big event. Eventually, I had a good time watching this and I thought it was pretty good when I saw it at the movie theater but it did receive some rather poor reviews and it was not a real success at the box-office. Eventually, 20 years later, I watched it again with Nick, my step-son, and, honestly, I have to admit it that I still enjoyed the damned thing. Indeed, basically, it is one of those typical huge Spielberg productions with some breathless action scenes, some great set-pieces and a really impressive cast (Robin Williams, Dustin Hoffman, Julia Roberts, Bob Hoskins, Maggie Smith, Phil Collins, Gwyneth Paltrow, Glenn Close). In my opinion, Robin Williams was basically born to play this part and the whole thing was indeed tailor-made for him. Obviously, like most of the features directed by Steven Spielberg, it worked fine as some popcorn entertainment but it was not really deep whatsoever and it tends to drag a little bit. Still, even though it is obviously a minor Spielberg effort, I think it remains an enjoyable family feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially for young children.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 18 January 2012 09:54 (A review of The Emerald Forest)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but since I always had a weak spot for John Boorman ‘s work, I was quite eager to check it out. Nowadays, Boorman is pretty much forgotten but from the 60's until the 00's, he had delivered some major movies such as 'Deliverance'. Back in the 80's, he also directed this forgotten gem. It features one of the best performances by Power Booth who was never really known for his subtle acting. I have to admit that it is a rather generic plot about a young white boy who spend 10 years in the Amazon jungle before his father, played by Power Booth, finds him back. There was also the old ecological message (which was actually some kind of new hype back then) but still I really enjoyed it. Indeed, the directing was quite amazing with some beautiful shots and you could feel they did some research about the tribes represented there. At least, it seemed rather believable and definitely mesmerizing to watch. Above all, even though the plot was rather generic, I was touched by the characters and what they were going through. Anyway, to conclude, in my opinion, it is a forgotten gem and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in John Boorman's work.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A classic

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 18 January 2012 08:28 (A review of Swing Time (1936))

Since this movie was on the list ‘1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die’, of course, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, to  be honest, I have to admit that I have never been a huge musical fan. As a matter of fact, I recently saw ‘La La Land’ and even though , it was a big critical and commercial success, I still had a hard time to care about the damned thing. Well, coming back to our main feature, since it is a huge classic, I still had to watch it at some point. Well, even though I usually prefer Gene Kelly, I must admit that Fred Astaire was really awesome in this flick. Indeed, together with Ginger Rogers, they had some great chemistry and they gave some really strong dance scenes here. Furthermore, I laughed a few times, above all  thanks to the supporting cast which was pretty good. Still, even though I'm well aware that it is inherent to the genre, the plot was just so silly and frivolous and I really had a hard time to care about the story and the characters involved. Still, it is and remains a classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like this genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 17 January 2012 09:26 (A review of Fierce Creatures)

Back then, in the 80's, the same cast (John Cleese, Jamie Lee Curtis, Kevin Kline, Michael Palin) worked together and made one of the most ridiculous and hilarious comedy ever, 'A fish called Wanda'. It was a deserved success and, 10 years later, they were back together and you would hope that it would be again a smash it. Unfortunately, even though it wasn't bad at all, this second flick was unfortunately nothing really mind-blowing. I mean, there were a few laughs here and there, it was expected with those guys but, unfortunately, it never reached its potential. I think the issue is that the story was not really interesting enough and it was the same thing concerning the characters. I mean, you can add as many jokes as you want but if the viewers don't care about the story and/or the characters involved, it will never really work. Still, it remains an entertaining comedy and I think it is worth a look, especially if you loved 'A fish called Wanda'.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 17 January 2012 08:59 (A review of Captivity)

I didn't expect much before watching this damned thing and, indeed, it turned out to be  nothing great. It's a sad thing that such a fine director like Roland Joffé would end up directing such a generic horror flick. Furthermore, I’m really getting fed up with this whole torture porn hype. Seriously, it is such a boring and uninteresting genre.... Anyway, coming back to our main feature, it was a really weak 'Saw' copycat with an omnipotent serial killer who sees and hears everything and who seems to have an illimitated budget and no day job whatsoever. To be honest, I always had a hard time to believe such a premise but, here, it was even more difficult than usual. I mean, usually, I never cared about the usual twist at the end but, this time around, I figured out right from  the start and the end-result was just rather weird. Indeed, if you are in captivity, with a strange guy, you might maybe end up having a close relationship with him, to kiss him would be already  a stretch, but do you really think that you would have sex with this guy, when you just have been tortured and when a psycho is filming the whole thing?!? I really I don't think so .... Anyway, to conclude, it was a really weak horror flick and I don’t think it is worth a look at all. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 16 January 2012 02:34 (A review of Ladder 49)

Honestly, before watching this, I wasn't expecting much from this flick but since it was starring John Travolta and Joaquin Phoenix, I thought I should give it a try. Eventually, it ended up being the best movie about the subject I have ever seen. I mean, it is not like any I have seen 1000's movies about firefighters and it doesn't mean it is a masterpiece but I thought the whole thing was pretty entertaining but still rather realistic. John Travolta gave, as usual, a decent performance and Joaquin Phoenix was just impressive (thank God he dropped the whole retirement-I-wanna-be-a-rapper thing!). I know it is not a really popular flick but I think it is actually rather underrated. Of course, the story is nothing mind-blowing whatsoever and it is actually rather predictable but they managed to make me care about these characters and what was happening to them. Eventually, even though it is not a masterpiece, it remains a well made and entertaining flick and, in my opinion, it is definitely worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 4 months ago on 16 January 2012 02:22 (A review of I Love You, Man)

Since I kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I thought I should check it out. First of all, to be honest, in my opinion, the concept was actually pretty lame when you think about it and the whole thing could have been pretty average (like, for example, 'Made of Honor'). Eventually, in spite this weak concept, I have to admit that they still managed to deliver a rather enjoyable comedy. Indeed, the whole thing turned to be actually quite entertaining, above all thanks to the characters which very well written and also well played by Paul Rudd and Jason Segel. I mean, during the whole thing I was expecting that something really weird or annoying would happen concerning Segel's character but, fortunately, it never happened. Indeed, these 2 guys just happened to have a great connection, even though they were quite different from each other and their relationship was just really genuine and believable. As a side note, I must say that the couple Jon Favreau-Jaime Pressly was just hilarious as well. To conclude, even though the whole concept was actually not really good at all, the characters were very well written and played that I still enjoyed the damned thing and, in my opinion, it is definitely worth a look.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 5 months ago on 15 January 2012 02:07 (A review of Obsessed)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. Indeed, I didn’t expect much from this flick but, somehow, I still ended up watching the damned thing. Well, Beyoncé is easily one of the biggest stars nowadays and it is not really surprising that, at some point, she would try to launch some kind of movie career on the side. This time, she went for a thriller and, honestly, I wasn't really impressed. Indeed, it was a really generic feature involving a jealous woman who doesn't get what she wants with a married man and goes psycho on the married couple. I mean, this kind of story has been done so many times before and way better than here. I have to admit that the directing and the acting were not really bad actually but they didn't add anything original to the formula and, honestly, the whole thing was rather boring to watch. Anyway, to conclude, it was a rather tedious and generic thriller and it is not really worth a look, except maybe if you are a die hard fan of Beyoncé.


0 comments, Reply to this entry