Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7782) - TV Shows (10)

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 11 June 2011 06:34 (A review of Cat's Eye)

Nowadays, I watch movies mostly with Netflix and Popcorn Time and, as a result, I have become slightly more picky about what I watch. In the past, I used to watch some really random stuff just because there were a few decent actors involved and this movie was a perfect example. Still, even though I have never been a fan of such Stephen King book adaptation, I thought that this one was actually not bad at all. It was basically some anthollogy with 3 fantastic tales. The first story centered on James Woods and I thought that the concept was pretty cool but there was a ratjer awkward mix of scary and funny stuff. But, as usual, James Woods was just awesome. The second story was easily the best one though.Indeed, the plot was quite captivating and it kept me on the edge of my seat and, this time, the combination of humor and suspense was very well done. The last story was not as good as the second story but there was still some interesting stuff. Indeed, the story was decent but Drew Barrymore gave a rather poor perfomance (was she already on drugs back then? I hope not...). On top of that, the special effects concerning the monster were just rather awesome. No CGI back then! To conclude, evenif  it is not a masterpiece whatsoever, it is still worth a look, especially if you're a Stephen King fan.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A nice surprise

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 07:16 (A review of Van Wilder)

Honestly, the whole thing looked and sounded really terrible, so I thought it would be be pretty bad but, somehow, I still ended up watching it. So even though I was expecting something very lame, to be honestly, I was actually positively surprised. Indeed, obviously, the story was nothing original and, if you have seen a teen comedy before, you pretty much know the drill. In fact, it was actually Ryan Reynolds who made the whole thing stand out and rather worthwhile to watch. Basically, he managed to portray a really genuine character who was quite funny, charming and still 3 dimensional which is something you would seriously never expect in this kind of movies. Since then, in the decade that followed, it was expected that he would become the next best thing but, unfortunately, he has made some serious flops, financially and critically, and it seems that his biggest achievement so far is to have managed to get married not only with Scarlett Johansson but also with Blake Lively which is quite a shame since the guy seems to be actually genuinely talented. To conclude, obviously, it is not a masterpiece whatsoever and it was still way too predictable for me, but if you love this genre, I still think it is worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 07:11 (A review of Stir of Echoes)

I don’t know if you have noticed it but I’m not a huge fan of thrillers. I mean, of course, some of them are really entertaining but they are always trying to sell you the most preposterous plots that you can imagine (and I won’t even mention the countless number of stupid twist endings they have given us through the years….). Still, they are some exceptions, some are them are actually pretty good and this one is definitely one of them, at least, that’s my opinion. The funny thing is that it is not even a really famous or popular thriller like ‘Seven’ or ‘The Silence of the Lambs’ and I didn’t like much Koepp’s following effort ‘Secret Window’ starring Johnny Depp. For all the people trashing Kevin Bacon, they should really check this movie because he is the one who made this movie worked. Obviously, the story was nothing new or original but Bacon succeeded brilliantly in getting you involved in the torment lived by his character and I also enjoyed the directing which was really efficient. The plot may sound like something you have seen 1000s times before but, somehow, I thought it was actually quite engrossing. To conclude, even though it is far from being a masterpiece, I think it is a pretty good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A disappointing movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 07:06 (A review of Running with Scissors)

Honestly, I wasn’t sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a very nice cast, I was quite eager to check this flick. Indeed, with such a cast (Annette Bening, Brian Cox, Joseph Fiennesl Evan Rachel Wood, Alec Baldwin, Gwyneth Paltrow, Gabrielle Union, Patrick Wilson, Kristin Chenoweth), I though it would be pretty good. And indeed, the actors gave some solid performances and the directing was decent as well but I can't say I really enjoyed the story though... Basically, it is one of those quirky indie features which goes just way over the top. Take for example Wes Anderson. He has pretty much become a master in this genre and, even though I do like this work, I think that sometimes he spend too much time creating a daft world with some eccentric characters when he should pay more attention to the story. I mean, I certainly don’t mind some quirkiness, it can be really nice but some movie makers will gamble everything on this element and, in this case, they really pushed it and after a while, I didn't care much about the characters involved and what they were going through. Eventually, it was too bad because the whole thing really had some potential and I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 07:01 (A review of A Cool, Dry Place)

Even though, I have never heard of this movie before, since there was an interesting cast, I thought I should give it a shot. An interesting thing to know beforehand is that, at the beginning of his career, Vince Vaughn actually tried other stuff than just his usual comedies. Unfortunately, almost all his attempts turned to out to be some failures, either critically and/or financially (except for 'Return to Paradise' which was actually pretty good but it was still barely seen when it was released). Anyway, this movie was not an exception, I´m afraid. Basically, this time it was a drama and Vince Vaughn tries very hard, just like the rest of the cast but, unfortunately, the story was just too weak and I didn't care much about the characters and what they were going through. Since then, Vaughn has decided to only focus on comedies and it was maybe a wise choice but, on the other hand, his comedies have been quite underwhelming as well so there is not much left for him, I’m afraid... Anyway, to conclude, even though I have to give Vaughn some credit for trying something else, the end-result was still rather disappointing and the whole thing was eventually not really worth a look.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 06:56 (A review of V.I. Warshawski (1991))

Honestly, I had no idea what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Katleen Turner, I thought I might as well give it a try. Indeed, back in the 80's, Katleen Turner was one of the most interesting actresses around. She looked good, she was funny and smart but, unfortunately, in the 90's, her career went down the drain... This movie is a good example as it must be her lowest point (though I haven't seen "Baby Geniuses"...). Nowadays, it is a rather obscure flick but, back then, this flick was in fact supposed to launch a new franchise starring Turner but since it was a massive flop in the USA, they dropped the whole project. Basically, it is a terribly underwhelming flick, it was not funny, not entertaining and it was just plain boring. It is a shame because Katleen Turner was born to play such characters and I don’t think she should be blamed since she did what she could with the material. To conclude, my rating might be a little too harsh but I really didn’t like it, I don’t think you should waste your time with this flick and you should probably avoid it.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 10 June 2011 11:43 (A review of Cassandra's Dream)

Back in the 90's, Woody Allen was one of my favorite directors and I have watched more of his movies than any other director (already 37 films!). But honestly, even if I keep watching his features from time to time when I have the opportunity, I can’t say I'm still a big fan of his work anymore. Seriously, in my opinion, it has been many years since he actually directed a really good movie and this movie was not an exception, I’m afraid. I mean, it wasn’t a bad movie at all, the directing was actually pretty good and so were the two lead actors but the story was just rather weak. Basically, it was some kind of light version of ‘Match Point’, which was maybe a critical hit but I though it was actually rather overrated. The plot also reminded me of the last masterpiece directed by Sidney Lumet, 'Before the Devil knows you're dead', but 'Before...' was actually way more convincing. Finally, I couldn’t help wondering why on Earth the whole thing had to take place in England?!? I'm pretty sure it would have been better if it took place in New York. Anyway, to conclude, it was not completely terrible and I think it is actually worth a look but we were far from the golden years of Woody Allen's masterful career with this flick. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 9 June 2011 12:50 (A review of Cleaner)

To be honest, I wasn’t really sure what to expect from this flick but I always had a weak spot for Renny Harlin’s work, I thought I might as well check it out. I know, Harlin is far from being a great director but many of his movies often fall in the category ‘guilty pleasure’. Well, this movie was actually a typical effort from the Finnish director. Indeed, this concept of ‘cleaner’ as a profession was pretty awesome and that there was definitely some potential to deliver at least a decent thriller. And, indeed, the beginning was promising with a nice mood and it was pretty neat to have Samuel L. Jackson playing the lead for once. Unfortunately, after a while, the story became rather weak and I kind of lost interesting in the whole thing as it became a rather average and predictable thriller. It is something rather usual with this director, even though he often manages to come up with some interesting ideas, he fails to properly develop these ideas and his movies almost always end being rather lazy and even cheap. To conclude, in spite of its flaws, I though it was a decent watch though and I think it is still worth a look. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 9 June 2011 11:19 (A review of Step Brothers)

Seriously, I still have a hard time to believe that Adam McKay has just won the Academy Award for Best Writing for ‘The Big Short’ and his movie was even very close to win also the Best Picture Academy Award (eventually, I thought it was a decent watch but not much more than that, to be honest).  Before this massive critical success, the guy had only directed some raunchy comedies starring Will Ferrell like this one. To be honest, even though this movie was a step-down from ‘Talladega Nights’, it was actually slightly better than I expected. Indeed, the beginning was actually quite all right and the material was in fact  interesting. Hell, even,  the jokes were actually pretty funny. Unfortunately, rather quickly, the whole thing completely lost focus and, from this point,  this feature was only about some rather tasteless jokes, most of the time involving both leads shouting insults at each other. Later on, Will Ferrel  and Adam McKay would work again together on ‘The Other Guys’ but even though it sounded promising, I thought it was really disappointing and in fact weaker than this movie. Anyway, to conclude, I think it’s too bad because, with such a concept, it could have been way funnier but I still think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre. 



0 comments, Reply to this entry

A missed opportunity

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 8 June 2011 08:17 (A review of 21)

Seriously, this story had some great potential and I just loved the material. Indeed, I always find it more interesting when a movie would focus on smart people  instead of your usual attractive people. At first, when watching this flick, it reminded me of ‘The Social Network’. Basically, this movie is what  ‘The Social Network’ would have looked if another less gifted director would have directed it. Indeed, unfortunately, even though it was based on a really fascinating story, the end result was just rather average. Basically, the whole thing was just really predictable and full of clichés and the dialogues were rather lame. Eventually, the big difference between ‘The Social Network’ and this movie was that while the movie directed by David Fincher  was really deep and thoughtfull, this movie was however just a piece of fluffy entertainment. Concerning Kate Bosworth, this movie would be her first and last high-profile production she would make following the failure of ‘Superman Returns’ and, since then, she would be only seen in some really obscure (and usually not really interesting) movies. It’s too bad because she seemed to have a bright career ahead of her when she started. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, it was not bad and it is indeed even rather entertaining but it was just really forgettable and it could have been so much better.



0 comments, Reply to this entry