
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:21
(A review of
Talk to Her)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was really eager to check it out again. By now, I have seen most of the movies directed by Pedro Almodóvar and, to be honest, even though I have a lot of respect for his work, I must confess that Iām not a huge fan and I have usually a hard time to really connect with his movies. There are some exceptions though and this movie is definitely one of them. In fact, it is easily my favorite movie directed by him. This time, the story was quite spellbinding and, for once, the whole thing didn't go way over the top, something that usually bothers me with Almodóvarās flicks. Sure, as usual with his work, there was still some weird stuff, butĀ the story was still a really strong drama with some complex but still believable characters. Above all, Begnino was not only wasĀ a typical messed-up Almodovar figure but also such a fascinating character. Indeed, even though the guy was completely delusional and did a monstrous thing, he wasn't displayed as a monster or a freak which was, in my opinion, one of Almodovar's biggest achievements. Anyway, back in those days, the Spanish master was pretty much at the top of his game as this feature followed up the already critically acclaimed āTodo sobre mi madreā and all his other movies released in the 2000ās will be very well received (āLa mala educaciónā, āVolverā, āLos abrazos rotosā). To conclude, I really loved this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Pedro Almodóvarās work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 11:10
(A review of
The Grim Reaper (1962))
This is the very first flick directed by Bertolucci. I have seen actually better movies directed by him but it is only real 'Italian' movie he directed that I saw, his other flicks being more 'International' procutions (like 'The last emperor' for example). Anyway, it is a very realistic movie with a spellbinding plot and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Bertolucci's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 11:05
(A review of
Death in Venice)
I already saw this movie but since it was ages ago, I was quite eager to check it out again. Indeed, the first time I saw it, I must have been about 16-17 years and, at the time, I didnāt get this movie at all. Indeed, back then, I kept hearing some really great things about this flick and since I always had a weak spot fot Luchino Viscontiās work, I was expecting a masterpiece but, to be honest, I wasn't really blown away eventually. Well, I was hoping that, 20 years later, I was now mature enough and that I would be more able to enjoy this movie but, unfortunately, I still struggled to connect with this movie. Eventually, what bothered me the most with this flick was that nothing much really happened through the whole thing. Indeed, the main character was walking around in Venice, going to the beach, to the restaurant and, that was it basically. On top of that, I wonāt blame Dirk Bogarde as he gave a really solid performance but I didnāt care much about this guy who was rather uncharismatic and even rather unlikable. Of course, the fact that he was basically a pedophile fantasizing on a very young boy obviously didnāt help. At least, as usual with Luchino Visconti, the whole thing was just really beautiful to look at but, to be honest, it did feel like watching paint dry. I mean, I understand that the whole thing was about the relationship between the main character and Art and also his relationship with mortality but I was never really convinced but, above all, I never really cared. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnāt really work me, I still think it is worth a look though , especially if you are interested in Italian movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:58
(A review of
City of Women)
There was a time when I started to discover the great classics and, of course, at some point, I got intrigued by Federico Fellini. From all his movies, the one I loved the most was by far āLa stradaā but, to be honest, I had a rather hard time to really connect with such huge classics like āLa dolce vitaā and ā8½ā (Iām actually planning to re-watch Ā at least āLa dolce vitaā in the near future though since I have it on DVD). However, later on, I have also watched this flick as well and even though it is probably one of the least appreciated movies directed by this director, I thought it was actually pretty good. I have to admit it, the whole thing was maybeĀ too similar to '8 1/2' and it is probably why it was dismissed but I thought there was something quite mesmerizing about the damned thing (something I actually didnāt really feel with ā8 1/2' to be honest). I donāt know, the fact that it was only focusing on his obsession about women seemed to work better for me somehow. Anyway, to conclude,Ā I think this movie is actually quite underrated, I really liked it and it think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Federico Felliniās work.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:38
(A review of
The Son's Room)
Since I have always been interested in Nanni Morettiās work, I was really eager to check this movie. Indeed, at last, thanks to this flick, Nanni Moretti was able to win the Golden Palm at the Cannes film festival. Sometimes, Iām under the impression that the Cannes Film Festival suffers from the same guilty feelings as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences as they give their top prize to some prestigious directors not really for their best movies but merely to make up for their past mistakes. Anyway, to be honest, it was not really original, but I thought it was a very well made drama with some really solid acting and it was obviously a rather heartbreaking story. Personally, I still prefer āCaro diarioā which was a little bit more experimental and it didnāt suffer the same constraints of the dramatic structure which were clearly visible here. Therefore, the tone here was also pretty dreary which was quite understandable considering the nature of its subject but the emotions displayed by the characters seemed to be quite genuine and the whole thing worked really well. To conclude, even though it might not be a masterpiece, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Italian movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:26
(A review of
Deep Red )
Even though I think Iām quite knowledgeable concerning movies, there are still some directors Iām still rather oblivious about. For example, I have seen only 2 movies directed by Ingmar Bergman and I have seen nothing made by Andrei Tarkovsky, Bela Tarr or Robert Bresson. Anyway, Iām always pretty excited when Iām about to watch for the 1st time a movie directed by a renown director and this flick was my first Dario Argento feature. So, you can imagine I had some rather high expectations. Eventually, I thought it was pretty good but I canāt say I was really blown away. I mean, it was a solid thriller, definitely, but, in my opinion, it was just a little bit better than your average thriller, not much more. Still, it doesnāt mean it wasnāt an enjoyable flick. Indeed, Argento managed to create a great tense mood and I loved the soundtrack provided by some band called āGoblinā. Furthermore, ever since I saw David Hemmings in ā Blow Upā , I had a weak spot for this actor and he was pretty good here, even though it was rather odd to choose a British actor to play the main character in this Italian production. However, at the end of the day, in my opinion, it remains one of those typically far-fetched plots inherent to the genre and I always have a hard time to enjoy a thriller when the whole thing gets too preposterous. Still, it remains a very well made and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 31 July 2011 01:02
(A review of
The Princess and the Warrior)
I remember, back in the 90ās, when 'Lola rennt' was released, it became an instant cult-classic and Tom Tykwer became overnight the new German movie wunderkind. Personally, I thought it was indeed visually really interesting and Franka Potente gave a very good performance but the story and the whole movie was nothing really amazing in my opinion. In spite of this, I was quite obvious that Tykwer was a talented fellow and I was definitely eager to check his following director effort. Honestly, it is a rather obscure feature and he didnāt get such an acclaim like 'Lola rennt' but I still think it was actually pretty good. The main difference, in my opinion, is that āLola renntā was very kinetic and visual, obviously aiming for a young audience whereas this movie was more aiming to a more sophisticated audience and it was sometimes rather difficult to follow where he was going and what he wanted to mean. Still, It is a rather deep picture and I may have not understood all the symbolism but it remains a very well done movie and quite a mesmerizing story. To conclude, even though it is a a really obscure movie, it is actually pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Tom Tykwerās work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 31 July 2011 12:50
(A review of
Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (1974))
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. The first time around, if I remember correctly, I saw it when I was living in England, I was following a movie class at the time and this feature was one we had to watch. The directing and acting were very sober and realistic but, to be honest, Fassbinder has a rather gloomy visual style. Evenrually, you have to really dig it, his movies are not what you could call āfunā to watch and it was therefore a rather depressing feature so I have to admit that I didn't feel much connection with it at the time. Well, I'm so glad I gave this movie a second look after all these years. The fact that I have myself right now involved with a beautiful younger African woman probably did have an impact on my appreciation for this movie but it also went beyond that though. Indeed, I thought these two characters were so genuine and so beautiful and, in my opinion, Brigitte Mira and El Hedi ben Salem both gave such fine performances here. Furthermore, even though it is inherent to Fassbinder's work, I was also shocked by the ghastly look he gave on Germany in the 70's. Basically, every single German individual was ignorant and a bigot which is such a huge contrast with the pacifist image this country had built during the 30 years following WWII. Even though you might think that he was too negative, with the recent rise of the extreme right in Germany 80 years after the war, I'm afraid he was actually quite prescient. The other thing that I really appreciated with this movie was the fact that, even though they might love each other, there was actually no happy-ending for them and this relationship will be tough on both of them which felt quite genuine. Anyway, to conclude, this movie would provide Fassbinder with international success for the very first time, it is usually consider as his magnum opus and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 31 July 2011 10:14
(A review of
Smart People)
I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a decent cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, it was one of these typical quirky indie comedies and I have noticed that I usually have a hard time to care about this genre but this one was not bad, at least, it was watchable. Indeed, some of the story lines were actually interesting and the cast was pretty good, especially Thomas Haden Church who stole the show everytime he was on the screen. Unfortunately, the whole thing never really took off and I thought, even though as I mentioned before the different story-lines were interesting, none of hem was actually properly developed. Above all, the relationship between Thomas Haden Church and Ellen Page was just disappointing. Concerning Ellen Page, after her breakthrough performances in āHard Candyā and even more in āJunoā, it seemed that she had a bright future ahead of her but, except for āInceptionā, afterwards she was mostly involved in some really obscure and rather forgettable features. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to conclude, even if it was rather flawed and not really succesfull, I still think it is worth a look though, especially if you like the genre.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 30 July 2011 01:45
(A review of
When You're Strange)
Well, since I'm a huge fan of the Doors, of course, I had to watch this movie at some point. By the way, what the hell happened to Tom DiCillo?!? Indeed, back in the 90ās, he became one of the most promising indie directors at work but during the last 20 years, he has directed only 3 movies including this documentary and 2 really weak and obscure movies (āDouble Whammyā and āDeliriousā). Anyway, coming to back our main feaure, to be honest, if you are a die-hard fan of the Doors, you wonāt learn anything really new here. However, it was still pretty awesome to go back in time with these guys and go through the major events involving this legendary band. Eventually, the remaining members of the band were really happy with this movie because, according to them, it was much more faitfull than āThe Doorsā directed by Oliver Stone but I believe that both movies are fine to watch side by side. Ā Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really ground-breaking, I thought it was a really neat documentary, it is definitely worth a look and it is even pretty much a must see for any decent Doors fan.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry