
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:33
(A review of
Viridiana)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I had it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. To be honest, even after re-watching this movie, it was still tricky for me to judge this movie. I mean, it is so subtle and I was never really sure what Luis BuƱuel was actually trying to achieve here. The interesting thing is that, the first time around, I thought it was great and inspiring and I really loved the damned thing. After all these years, it is rather difficult to imagine how shocking this movie must have been when it came out at the beginning of the 60's (in fact, even though it was made and produced in Spain, it was banned in this country for many years). Maybe, what BuƱuel meant with this movie, was that the traditional religious dogma might be actually a waste of time as it goes against many of our basic urges. Eventually, we are all sinners some way or another so there is really no need to feel so guilty about it, as displayed in the last scene, and our sins are basically what makes us human. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnāt completely blow me away, it was still a really intriguing flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Luis BuƱuel's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:29
(A review of
Live Flesh)
It has been a while since I have seen this flick and I should probably re-watch it at some point. By now, I have seen more than half of the movies directed by Pedro Almodóvar and, to be honest, even though I have a lot of respect for his work, I must confess Iām not a huge fan and I have usually a hard time to connect with his movies. There are some exceptions though and this movie is definitely one of them. In fact, it is not even one of the most famous movies directed by Almodóvar but it is actually one of my favorites. I mean, sure, as usual with this director, the whole thing was rather over the top but, this time, it didn't bother me at all. Indeed, I thought that the story worked very well, all the actors involved delivered some solid performances and, above all, I was for once able to connect with these characters. After this, Almodóvar would come up with āTodo sobre mi madreā which would turn out to be one of his biggest critical successes but, personally, I preferred this lesser known feature. Anyway, to conclude, I really liked this movie a lot and it is definitely worth a look especially if you are interested in Pedro Almodóvar's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:24
(A review of
Sex and Lucia)
It was one of the first movies starring Paz Vega and after this flick, her career really took off. A year later, she would work with Pedro Almodovar (they would make only 1 movie together) and 3 years later, she would make a first US production (āSpanglishā) but her career eventually never managed to be as successful as PenĆ©lope Cruz. Concerning the director, Julio Medem, even though he seems to have a pretty solid reputation , I have never seen anything else directed by this guy but I will sure do whenever I get the opportunity. Indeed, even though I have a lot of respect for Almodovarās work, I usually have a hard time to connect with his eccentric characters. With Medem, the characters are just as complex but I was more able to connect with them and there was something really intriguing about them and what they were going through. There was also a lot of talk about the rather explicit sex scenes but they fit really well with the rest of the story so they didnāt bother me. Anyway, it is a very profound and emotional drama, I really loved it and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Spanish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:21
(A review of
Talk to Her)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was really eager to check it out again. By now, I have seen most of the movies directed by Pedro Almodóvar and, to be honest, even though I have a lot of respect for his work, I must confess that Iām not a huge fan and I have usually a hard time to really connect with his movies. There are some exceptions though and this movie is definitely one of them. In fact, it is easily my favorite movie directed by him. This time, the story was quite spellbinding and, for once, the whole thing didn't go way over the top, something that usually bothers me with Almodóvarās flicks. Sure, as usual with his work, there was still some weird stuff, butĀ the story was still a really strong drama with some complex but still believable characters. Above all, Begnino was not only wasĀ a typical messed-up Almodovar figure but also such a fascinating character. Indeed, even though the guy was completely delusional and did a monstrous thing, he wasn't displayed as a monster or a freak which was, in my opinion, one of Almodovar's biggest achievements. Anyway, back in those days, the Spanish master was pretty much at the top of his game as this feature followed up the already critically acclaimed āTodo sobre mi madreā and all his other movies released in the 2000ās will be very well received (āLa mala educaciónā, āVolverā, āLos abrazos rotosā). To conclude, I really loved this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Pedro Almodóvarās work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 11:10
(A review of
The Grim Reaper (1962))
This is the very first flick directed by Bertolucci. I have seen actually better movies directed by him but it is only real 'Italian' movie he directed that I saw, his other flicks being more 'International' procutions (like 'The last emperor' for example). Anyway, it is a very realistic movie with a spellbinding plot and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Bertolucci's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 11:05
(A review of
Death in Venice)
I already saw this movie but since it was ages ago, I was quite eager to check it out again. Indeed, the first time I saw it, I must have been about 16-17 years and, at the time, I didnāt get this movie at all. Indeed, back then, I kept hearing some really great things about this flick and since I always had a weak spot fot Luchino Viscontiās work, I was expecting a masterpiece but, to be honest, I wasn't really blown away eventually. Well, I was hoping that, 20 years later, I was now mature enough and that I would be more able to enjoy this movie but, unfortunately, I still struggled to connect with this movie. Eventually, what bothered me the most with this flick was that nothing much really happened through the whole thing. Indeed, the main character was walking around in Venice, going to the beach, to the restaurant and, that was it basically. On top of that, I wonāt blame Dirk Bogarde as he gave a really solid performance but I didnāt care much about this guy who was rather uncharismatic and even rather unlikable. Of course, the fact that he was basically a pedophile fantasizing on a very young boy obviously didnāt help. At least, as usual with Luchino Visconti, the whole thing was just really beautiful to look at but, to be honest, it did feel like watching paint dry. I mean, I understand that the whole thing was about the relationship between the main character and Art and also his relationship with mortality but I was never really convinced but, above all, I never really cared. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnāt really work me, I still think it is worth a look though , especially if you are interested in Italian movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:58
(A review of
City of Women)
There was a time when I started to discover the great classics and, of course, at some point, I got intrigued by Federico Fellini. From all his movies, the one I loved the most was by far āLa stradaā but, to be honest, I had a rather hard time to really connect with such huge classics like āLa dolce vitaā and ā8½ā (Iām actually planning to re-watch Ā at least āLa dolce vitaā in the near future though since I have it on DVD). However, later on, I have also watched this flick as well and even though it is probably one of the least appreciated movies directed by this director, I thought it was actually pretty good. I have to admit it, the whole thing was maybeĀ too similar to '8 1/2' and it is probably why it was dismissed but I thought there was something quite mesmerizing about the damned thing (something I actually didnāt really feel with ā8 1/2' to be honest). I donāt know, the fact that it was only focusing on his obsession about women seemed to work better for me somehow. Anyway, to conclude,Ā I think this movie is actually quite underrated, I really liked it and it think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Federico Felliniās work.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:38
(A review of
The Son's Room)
Since I have always been interested in Nanni Morettiās work, I was really eager to check this movie. Indeed, at last, thanks to this flick, Nanni Moretti was able to win the Golden Palm at the Cannes film festival. Sometimes, Iām under the impression that the Cannes Film Festival suffers from the same guilty feelings as the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences as they give their top prize to some prestigious directors not really for their best movies but merely to make up for their past mistakes. Anyway, to be honest, it was not really original, but I thought it was a very well made drama with some really solid acting and it was obviously a rather heartbreaking story. Personally, I still prefer āCaro diarioā which was a little bit more experimental and it didnāt suffer the same constraints of the dramatic structure which were clearly visible here. Therefore, the tone here was also pretty dreary which was quite understandable considering the nature of its subject but the emotions displayed by the characters seemed to be quite genuine and the whole thing worked really well. To conclude, even though it might not be a masterpiece, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Italian movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 10:26
(A review of
Deep Red )
Even though I think Iām quite knowledgeable concerning movies, there are still some directors Iām still rather oblivious about. For example, I have seen only 2 movies directed by Ingmar Bergman and I have seen nothing made by Andrei Tarkovsky, Bela Tarr or Robert Bresson. Anyway, Iām always pretty excited when Iām about to watch for the 1st time a movie directed by a renown director and this flick was my first Dario Argento feature. So, you can imagine I had some rather high expectations. Eventually, I thought it was pretty good but I canāt say I was really blown away. I mean, it was a solid thriller, definitely, but, in my opinion, it was just a little bit better than your average thriller, not much more. Still, it doesnāt mean it wasnāt an enjoyable flick. Indeed, Argento managed to create a great tense mood and I loved the soundtrack provided by some band called āGoblinā. Furthermore, ever since I saw David Hemmings in ā Blow Upā , I had a weak spot for this actor and he was pretty good here, even though it was rather odd to choose a British actor to play the main character in this Italian production. However, at the end of the day, in my opinion, it remains one of those typically far-fetched plots inherent to the genre and I always have a hard time to enjoy a thriller when the whole thing gets too preposterous. Still, it remains a very well made and entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 31 July 2011 01:02
(A review of
The Princess and the Warrior)
I remember, back in the 90ās, when 'Lola rennt' was released, it became an instant cult-classic and Tom Tykwer became overnight the new German movie wunderkind. Personally, I thought it was indeed visually really interesting and Franka Potente gave a very good performance but the story and the whole movie was nothing really amazing in my opinion. In spite of this, I was quite obvious that Tykwer was a talented fellow and I was definitely eager to check his following director effort. Honestly, it is a rather obscure feature and he didnāt get such an acclaim like 'Lola rennt' but I still think it was actually pretty good. The main difference, in my opinion, is that āLola renntā was very kinetic and visual, obviously aiming for a young audience whereas this movie was more aiming to a more sophisticated audience and it was sometimes rather difficult to follow where he was going and what he wanted to mean. Still, It is a rather deep picture and I may have not understood all the symbolism but it remains a very well done movie and quite a mesmerizing story. To conclude, even though it is a a really obscure movie, it is actually pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Tom Tykwerās work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry