Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 4 June 2011 08:56
(A review of
17 Again)
To be honest, when I first heard about this movie, I thought it looked rather lame and I didnāt expect much from the damned thing. I mean, when I was a kid, I thought that āBigā sounded fascinating, it was eventually fun but not much more than that but I certainly didnāt see the point of making such a rip-off starring Zac Efron. By the way, what the hell happened to Efron? I mean, when he got his breakthrough with āHigh School Musicalā, he was pretty cute but, in his recent movies, he always has this very unnatural and rather ugly ripped body. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, after seeing the damned thing, I thought it was actually not so bad but the more I think about it, the more I think it was actually still pretty weak. I mean, sure, it was rather well done but there was absolutely nothing original about the damned thing. Furthermore, there were some rather awkward scenes like when Zac Efron almost made out with his own daughter and then later on with his (ex)wife. Those scenes were supposed to be funny but they were actually more embarassing then anything else. Eventually, I guess you shouldn't take this flick too seriously and if you're a fan of Zac Efron, this movie would probably be a heavenly gift.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 3 June 2011 12:10
(A review of
The Tree of Life (2011))
I have been waiting to see this movie for maybe 2 years and I definitely had some big expectations. Honestly, I can't say it was as good as I expected but it was still a very good picture. Basically, it starts with an awe inspiring introduction which I cannot describe and then the movie went very theological and metaphysical. I guess that since I'm not that smart, I was kind of losing track of the whole thing but then Mallick came again and again with some amazing sequences really beautifully shot with some awesome music, and then I was again completely fascinated by the moving pictures in front of me. I know, this review sounds rather cryptical but so is this movie. Watching this movie is like going to a museum and staring at a masterpiece. Nothing is explained to you but you get some emotional reaction to it, right there in your gut, a reaction which will be really personal and someone else may have a completely different response to it. In my opinion, Brad Pitt gave an amazing performance and displayed once again that he is one of the best actors around and I don't think I have ever seen any children giving such impressive performances before, just mind-blowing. And of course, Malick is an amazing director, actually he is not, he is an amazing artist, something rare nowadays in the movie industry. To conclude, many people won't get this movie and will loathe it. It is definitely the least accessible movie directed by Malick and I'm not sure I did get half of it but it doesn't matter. It touched me very deeply and many times, I thought I was watching myself when the father was messing up his family or when the older boy was getting messed up. Anyway, if you're looking for some deep and meaningfull movie, you should definitely have a look at this one.
6 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 3 June 2011 11:44
(A review of
Zombieland)
Back in 2009, this flick turned out to be quite a success. For Ruben Fleischer, it was an impressive directing debut and the cast was pretty much spot on (Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Bresling, Bill Murray, Amber Heard). Eventually, to be honest, after watching the damned thing, I thought it was a little bit overrated but it was still an enjoyable flick nonetheless. For example, the 'rules' were a really neat idea but, unfortunately, they came much too often and therefore they became a little bit annoying after a while. Furthermore, the movie wasĀ sometimesĀ rather slow and nothing much was going on during those parts. Still, Jesse Eisenberg was all right and Woody Harrelson, one of the most underrated actors at work nowadays,Ā was just awesome and heĀ completely stole the show . Later on, āThe Walking Deadā would keep surfing on the current zombie craze. This is how you could describe those two : on one hand, you have āThe Walking Deadā which has a realistic and grim approach and, on the other hand, you have āZombielandā which has a fun and goofy view on zombie survival but, at the end of the day, none of those two features really provide anything really new to the genre. At least, that's how I see it. Anyway, eventually, if you look for some brainless entertainment, it is definitely worth a look and you should check this one out, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 3 June 2011 10:37
(A review of
Day of the Dead)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I had it on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again. Well, the first time around, after watching the 2 first zombie movies directed by Romero, I was just really eager to finish this trilogy. Obviously, this sequel didn't have such a stellar reputation like its predecessors but I still enjoyed it. The best thing, at least for me, was that all there 3 movies were so different in their look and also in their approach on the zombieĀ concept. Furthermore, I think it is pretty neat that there was about a decade between each movie. This way, you had a distinctive visual difference between all of them and this way and you could clearly see the evolution of those dear zombies. This flick was pretty much the most straightforward one and therefore the least interesting (the typical generic and cheesy 80's soundtrack didn't help either) but the special effects were pretty awesome and Frankenstein was a rather funny character. To conclude, even though it may not be a classic like its predecessors, it is still an enjoyable zombie flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 3 June 2011 10:20
(A review of
Airport)
I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this movie but since there was a decent a cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Even though Burt Lancaster really disliked the whole thing, it was actually better than I expected and I thought it was actually a decent watch. Above all, I particularly enjoyed how they displayed the work in the airport, I thought it was quite realistic and rather well done. Unfortunately, they spent a good chunk of the running time dealing with the personnal life of the airport workers and, even though it was expected in a disaster feature like this one, it did turn the whole thing into some kind of Ā cheap soap opera which was too bad. Anyway, since Ā it was a big box-office hit when it was released, they kept making some sequels (3 in total) but I haven't seen any of them. On the other hand, Iām not sure if they are really worth a look but maybe I will check them out at some point. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of this flaws, it was still an entertaining flick and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 1 June 2011 11:32
(A review of
Don't Come Knocking)
Back in the 90's, I was a huge fan of Wim Wenders and I enjoyed most of his flicks. Unfortunately, during the last decade, his movies were honestly not so good and I kind of lost interest in his work. I still wanted to check this movie though, at least for old time's sake, even though it was quite obscure. Eventually, it wasn't really good, I'm afraid and it is a perfect example of how rather underwhelming Wender's work has become lately. I mean, it was far from being a bad movie as the directing was still decent (I wouldn't expect less from Wenders) and all the actors involved gave some decent performances but the story was rather weak. Eventually, the damned thing was never really entertaining or interesting at all. Back in the 80's, Wenders managed to make 'Paris, Texas', one of the best movies ever made, and this movie was basically about nothing really in particular but it was still mesmerizing. Here, he basically delivered another movie about basically nothing but it was more tedious than actually mesmerizing. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it still think it is was a decent watch and it is worth a look, especially if you're interested in Wim Wenders's work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 1 June 2011 07:05
(A review of
The Texas Chainsaw Massacre)
To be honest, I have never been a huge fan of the original āThe Texas Chainsaw Massacreā but I still think it is a solid and good horror flick. Furthermore, this movie was a huge milestone for this genre. Obviously, it was only a matter of time before they would come up with a remake but I donāthink it was necessarily a really bad idea. Indeed, Ā in fact, I don't have anything against remakes, the original concept of chainsaw cannibal killers remains pretty fascinating and a brand new version with a bigger budget combined with the modern movie techniques could have been interesting. But, unfortunately, like 99.9 % of the remakes out there, the makers added nothing and they didnāt make any improvements on the previous version in any way. What I really liked in the first one was the nice and slow progression until the violent climax. This time, the built up was slow, indeed, but also really boring and I didn't feel much tension during the whole thing. Then, the violent scenes were in fact toned down and they were therefore just very disappointing. Finally, all the scenes they added were rather useless. To conclude, it was not the worst thing I have ever seen but it was still pretty damned average and it is definitely an unnecessary remake.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 31 May 2011 11:45
(A review of
Lies and Alibis)
Honestly, since it is a rather obscure flick, I had no idea what to expect from it but since I always had a weak spot for Steven Coogan, I was quite eager to check it out. Indeed, each time I watch a movie with Steve Coogan, each time, I find him really hilarious which is something really rare since Iām usually quite critical about comedies in general. The weird thing is that he basically plays the same guy each time around but, honestly, I don't really care and he must be one of the funniest actors around right now. Anyway, I would watch anything starring this guy and this movie is a good example. Indeed, the story was alright but it was still nothing original and it was rather predictable. It's too bad because Coogan was quite amazing as usual and he did deserve a better plot than this. Concerning Rebecca Romijn, she looked quite stunning as usual, but, to be honest, Iām not sure she was really convincing as some supposedly smart woman. Still, in spite of its flaws, it remains a decent comedy and I think it is worth a look, especially if you are interested in Steve Cooganās work.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 31 May 2011 11:38
(A review of
Baby Boy)
Honestly, I didn't have some really high expectations before watching this flick but since I have a weak spot for John Singletonās work, especially for āBoyz n the Hoodā which is pretty much a modern classic, I thought I might as well check this one out. Basically, it is one of the more obscure flicks directed by Singleton but I thought it was actually pretty good. Sure, it wasnāt really original but, first of all, it starts with a visually impressive introduction (you have to see it yourself to believe it, it is worth watching the movie already) and then it follows with a very raw, nuanced and realistic depiction of the black people in America. At least, it seemed to be realistic and Singleton managed to create some really compelling characters. Take for example the main character played by Tyrese Gibson. On one hand, he is a massive irresponsible douchebag who has 2 kids from 2 different women but, on the other hand, he is actually quite nice with both of them and it really seems that he wants to do the right thing. Anyway, to conclude, I thought it was a very surprising and rather thoughtfull feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
Posted : 13 years, 7 months ago on 31 May 2011 11:33
(A review of
The Assignment)
Honestly, I wasnāt sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a pretty nice cast, I thought I might as well give it a try. Basically, it is a rather unknown and quite obscure flick (it is in fact a Canadian production and, apparently, it was mostly shot in MontrĆ©al but it is not something that bothered me) but I thought it was actually pretty good and, in my opinion, it is actually rather underrated. First of all, Ben Kingsley and Donald Sutherland, as usual, were quite good here and it was interesting to see Aidan Quinn playing the bad guy for once (even though it was only for a very short time). Of course, you could argue that the story was not really original and it is indeed true, it shamelessly borrows elements from other more prestigious productions but, somehow, it actually worked out fine, at least for me. Indeed, I thought it was quite entertaining and it kept me on the edge of my seat until the end. To conclude, even though it is nothing amazing, I think it is actually a decent flick and, in my opinion, it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments,
Reply to this entry