
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 08:10
(A review of
The Idiots (1998))
Back then, there was a lot of hype surrounding the Dogme and this was the second movie featuring those rules. I was personally completely blown away by 'Festen' directed by Thomas Vinterberg which was the first movie featuring the Dogme rules so I was really eager to watch this second movie. Eventually, to be honest, I ended up with some mixed feelings. Indeed, the main issue here is that the whole thing seemed actually rather pointless to me. I mean, why do they in fact choose this way of life? Basically, you have a bunch of elitists who decided to act as mentally retarded people, that's it and the only reason I could come up with is that thanks to them Lars Von Trier could make this movie, that's all. Sure, I understand it worked as a critic towards our modern society but I still think it was far-fetched to believe that a group of people would choose to live like this. But even though it was flawed, I thought this flick was still really interesting. Indeed, as usual, this director manipulates the viewer and he manages to make this flick still rather fascinating. Eventually, even though it was not as amazing as 'Festen', it is still a pretty good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Lars von Trier's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 07:54
(A review of
Drifting Clouds (1996))
I have seen this movie maybe 15 years ago so I don't remember all the details. What I do remember that it was a mixed of drama and comedy. The humor is rather subtle and very pitch black. So, I guess it is an acquired taste but I thought it was rather awesome. Definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Finnish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 07:43
(A review of
Brothers)
Since I kept hearing good things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. Eventually, even though I liked it a lot, I still ended up with some mixed feelings about the whole thing. Basically, what bothered me was that the story started with two stereotypes and ended up with two other stereotypes. Indeed, it is actually pretty straightforward, the good brother became the bad brother and the bad brother became the good brother. Personally, it is not something that I found really interesting (I don't really care about stereotypes) and it was honestly also rather predictable. So, this issue prevented the movie from becoming a huge masterpiece but it was still a very good movie though. Indeed, the directing was very good and efficient (Susanne Bier is definitely one of the best Danish directors to come out in the last decade) and above all thanks, the acting was just really awesome. I mean, honestly, who thought Connie Nielsen could be such a great actress? Up to that point, Nielsen was basically the love interest in many US productions, but for her very first Danish feature, she got a really juicy part and she really hit it out of the park. Ulrich Tomsen and Nikolaj Lie Kaas were just as brilliant as well. Eventually, in spite its flaws, it remains a very strong drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Danish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 07:37
(A review of
The Seventh Seal)
Not so long ago, my good friend the giraffe finally saw āCitizen Kaneā and even though he enjoyed this timeless classic, he didnāt think it was really amazing (in my opinion, it is one of the greatest movies ever made). He didnāt trash the movie, he just didnāt connect with it. Well, I have the same thing with Ingmar Bergman. By now, I have seen only two of his movies (I know, it isnāt muchā¦) and, so far, I canāt say Iām a big fan of his work. Still, this masterpiece left a big impression on me. Indeed, the directing, the story and the acting, above all by Max van Sydow, was nothing short of amazing. I was above all impressed by the ominous chess game with Death, one of the most legendary film scenes ever put together. Still, like I said before, even though I was impressed, somehow, there were good chunks of the movie that literally went over my head. Later on, I watched āFanny and Alexanderā, another masterpiece directed by Bergman, and I had even a harder time to get into this flick. Anyway, to conclude, it is probably one of the most thoughtful movies ever made and it is definitely a must see of any decent movie lover.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 07:16
(A review of
Lilya Forever)
Since I kept hearing interesting about this movie, I was really eager to check it out. On top of that, I thought 'Fucking Ć
mÄl' was a very solid directing debut so I was really curious to see what Lukas Moodysson would do next. In fact, it took me many years to see something else from this guy but it was definitely worth it. Indeed, I thought this follow up (his 3rd directing effort, as a matter of fact) was really impressive but, to be honest, I thought it was also a really heartbreaking story. I mean, the whole thing was completely relentless and there was absolutely no redemption in this movie. When watching this flick, I was actually wondering what does a guy feel when he goes to see such an underage prostitute. Seriously, how could they possibly enjoy themselves?!? I have seen some tough movies but this one was just really hardcore and despicable and you should definitely be aware of this before watching this flick as there is a good chance you will feel terrible afterwards (I sure did). Anyway, I still have to add that the directing and acting were just awesome and if you don't mind getting really depressed while watching a movie, it is actually definitely worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 2 August 2011 06:34
(A review of
Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian)
To be honest, if there was ever a useless franchise, it must be this one. I mean, sure, there are some worse franchises out there but Iām just amazed,Ā with such abysmal material,Ā Ā that they managed to come up with no less than a whole trilogy and, to make things worse, they all turned out to be fairly successful at the box-office. What bothers me the most with these movies is how moronic the concept actually is. Indeed, I do believe that a museum is actually a fascinating place and I just simply despise the idea that you actually need to make everything move to make it interesting or more entertaining. It is rather amazing that they managed to get such an impressive cast (Ben Stiller, Amy Adams, Owen Wilson, Hank Azaria, Robin Williams, Christopher Guest, Alain Chabat, Steve Coogan, Ricky Gervais, Bill Hader, Jon Bernthal, Rami Malek, Jay Baruchel, Mindy Kaling, Eugene Levy, Ed Helms, Jonah Hill) but, still, I can't say I enjoyed this flick. At least, I have to admit that it was not worse than the first movie but it wasnāt better either. To conclude, I barely could stand the damned thing and I donāt think it is worth a look at all.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 01:30
(A review of
Golden Balls)
Honestly, I'm not really knowledgeable about Spanish cinema. I mean, I have seen my share of Pedro Almodovar features but I'm rather oblivious concerning the other movies made there. I have seen also a few movies directed by Bigas Luna who might not have such an prestigious international reputation like Almodovar but his work is really interesting nonetheless. His most famous movie must be 'Jamón, jamón', a rather erotic flick starring a very young Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem almost 20 years before they became an item. So, this other movie was also directed by Bigas Lunas, and even though it was not as good as 'Jamón, jamón', it was still pretty good in my opinion. Above all, it features another amazing perfomance by Javier Bardem, the Spanish Marlon Brando. I find it pretty funny that since 'No Country for Old Men', everyone is raving about Bardem but how many of us have actually seen some of his Spanish movies he made before (he has made almost 30 movies before 'No Country for Old Men' mostly in Spain). Anyway, I must admit, it is a rather weid movie without much plot and I wasn't sure if it was a comedy, a drama or something entirely different. Still, like I said before, the main character played by Bardem was quite fascinating and made the whole thing quite worthwhile. To conclude, even though it is nothing really amazing, it still remains a pretty good flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Spanish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 01:22
(A review of
Open Your Eyes)
With this movie, Alejandro Amenabar became a household name and went to direct āThe Othersā in Hollywood. After āMar Adentroā, it became rather quiet with the Spanish director but, apparently, he is coming back with something new in 2015 after a 6 years hiatus. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, I find it rather difficult to choose between this one and the remake which one is the best. Still, I think I still prefer the original version because it focuses more on the story, there was no Hollywood influence here and, of course, the whole thing came from this flick. Still, even though it was an intriguing story, somehow, it didnāt really blow me away. I donāt know, on one hand, the surrealist atmosphere was one of the main assets of this movie, making it sometimes quite mesmerizing but, on the other hand, because of all the weird stuff going on, it was difficult to connect with the characters or to care with that they were going through. Still, to conclude, even though I didnāt think it was really a masterpiece, it remains a pretty good mind-f*ck and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Spanish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 01:14
(A review of
Jamón, Jamón)
I remember it quite well when this movie was released. Indeed, back then, I must have been 12 or 13 years old when it was released, and there was quite some buzz about this movie, at least in France. I remember also very well this big bull on the poster. Sure, it seemed rather weird and obviously really inappropriate for someone of my age but, somehow, I thought it looked really intriguing. Eventually, it took me about 20 years to finally see the damned thing. The first interesting about this flick is that it was the first movie starring PenƩlope Cruz and, if I'm not wrong, she was just about 18 years old at the time. It was also one of the first movies starring Javier Bardem but they would eventually get romantically involved only 15 years later. Anyway, coming back to our main feature, it was basically a slightly erotic drama with some rather messed up characters but the story was mostly quite spellbinding to watch. To conclude, even though it might not be a masterpiece, I thought it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Spanish movies.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 1 August 2011 12:41
(A review of
Bad Education)
I already saw this movie, but since it was ages ago, I thought I might as well check it out again. First of all, Pedro Almodovar is one of those directors that I have always admired but, to be honest, he never became a personal favorite of mine. Basically, he is what you could call a real author who has created his own style and, therefore, he always got my respect but, honestly, I always had a hard time to connect with his work. Still, he did make a few movies which really did impress me and this one was definitely one of them. Eventually, I'm really glad I gave it another shot because I was, this time, much more able to enjoy the damned thing. Indeed, the acting, especially by Gael Garcia Bernal who was at the time probably one of the most interesting actors at work, was quite strong. It was really neat to see this Mexican actor in a Spanish production and it is a real pity the guy never really broke through like I was hoping for. On top of that, Almodovar definitely knows how to direct a movie and the whole thing was certainly interesting to behold. Above all, after all these years, I was finally able to enjoy this fascinating story which definitely belongs among the best delivered by the Spanish master, no less than that. Sure, he gave us his usual convoluted twists and some over-the-top characters which have always been some of his most famous trademarks but, here, it didn't bother me, in the contrary. Eventually, all the characters involved were complex and flawed but still relatable which is not always the case with this director. Anyway, to conclude, it really deserves its stellar reputation and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Pedro Almodovar's work.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry