Login
Home
583 Lists
7756 Reviews
CollectionsTo be honest, it has been a while since I have seen this movie and maybe I should re-watch it at some point. Anyway, I remember it quite well when it was released. Indeed, it was a critical success when it was released at the [Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see][Link removed - login to see]and I was really eager to check it out. In fact, somehow, the whole thing did remind me of Woody Allen in the sense that it was very talkative but also very smart, at least, thatās my opinion. Basically, there was no plot whatsoever and, instead, the characters just kept talking, talking and talking again and it either bore you to death or it fascinates you. Well, I thought it was rather fascinating. Eventually, 8 years later, Moretti would come back to the Cannes Film Festival and would win this time the prestigious Golden Palm with ā[Link removed - login to see]ā which was really good as well but I still preferred this movie though. Anyway, surprisingly,I have noticed that, after all these years, I havenāt seen many movies directed by this director which is too bad. Anyway, to conclude, I thought it was pretty good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Italian movies.Ā
A very good movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 11:12
(A review of Dear Diary (1993))
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A great classic
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 11:02
(A review of Ossessione)I wonder if it was the first movie directed by Luchino Visconti that I managed to watch. Anyway, I remember it very well the first time I saw it. Indeed, back then I was studying in England, in Cambridge for a year, and I managed to follow a course about movies which was easily my favorite course. Every week we would watch a movie and talk about it, starting from the silent era going up to the 90ās. I think this movie was one of the first we watched and it had a great impact one me. At the time, I wasnāt familiar with this story (I hadnāt seen yet both versions of āThe Postman Always Rings Twiceā respectively from 1946 and 1981 but Viscontiās take was still the best) and I thought it was quite fascinating. What was even more impressive is that this movie was Visconti's directing debut. For a first time director, the guy definitely displayed some skills and, just like Godard and Truffaut with the New Wave, he pretty much managed to launch a whole movie genre in the processĀ which was, in this case, Italian neo-realism.Ā To conclude, it is pretty much a classic and it is definitely worth a look and a must see for any movie lovers.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A very good movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 10:48
(A review of Il Sorpasso (1962))To be honest, I wonder how or why I actually ended up watching this flick. Indeed, it is in fact a rather unknown and forgotten feature and itĀ was definitely pretty obscure. My best guest is that, at the time, there was a very good critic about this movie in our TV magazine. Anyway, I thought it was eventually a very nice surprise. I don't know why exactly but I thought the whole thing was quite rather fascinating. Maybe it had to do with the combination of sweet and sour as it was filled with joy and but also with some huge sad moments. Even though I knew both Jean-Louis Trintignant and Vittorio Gassman, I must admit it, I'm rather oblivious about their work but they were both really good in this movie. I know, the whole thing was eventually not really original but I really loved the execution. The way they played with the stereotypes and the characters was quite spellbinding, at least, that's my opinion. To conclude, even though it is rather obscure and nowadays pretty much forgotten, I thought it was really good and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Italian movies.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A great movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 10:36
(A review of Das Boot)I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out again. The second time around, I watched the director's cut which last more than more than 3 hrs which was slightly disorienting as it gave me the feeling that I had forgotten most of the damned thing. Anyway, it is still quite amazing and it was much better than anything directed before or after by Wolfgang Petersen (what happened to this guy actually? He seemed to be pretty much retired nowadays). Anyhow, I always thought that there was something fascinating about movies dealing with submarines and this one is by far the best one. Indeed, since then, it has been imitated numerous times but this feature remains the reference in its genre and I will remain so for a long time. Basically, the directing was impressive and, like I said before, you could argue that Wolfgang Petersen never reached these heights again in his career. Eventually, the mood was just so intense, there was a completely nail-biting tension and I was on the edge of my seat from the beginning until the last seconds. At the end of the day, it is not only a great submarine movie, it is basically one of the best war features ever made. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved this flick, it is a classic and a must see for all movie lovers, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A great classic
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 10:18
(A review of M)Honestly, it has been a while since I have seen this flick and I should definitely re-watch it at some point whenever I get the opportunity. The point is that this flick is just a massive masterpiece and it really blew me away the first time I saw it. Basically, in my opinion, it is the ultimate psychopath movie and during the last 80 years(!), they have tried to improve the formula but they never improved on the blue print developped in this feature. The funny thing is that I have always been a little bit dismissive towards the serial killer sub-genre. Indeed, most of them, even such massive classics like āThe Silence of The Lambsā and āSevenā, are so far-fetched, so over the top, I always have a hard time to really connect with them. This one is different though. Indeed, there are no chases, no shootings, no explosions like you see in your typical US thriller. What you have instead is just a frightening and fascinating psychological study of a sick mind and I thought it was much more interesting to behold. To conclude, I think it is a great flick, a tremendous classic, and it is a must-see for any decent movie fan.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A great classic
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 10:01
(A review of La Strada (1954))I have seen this movie a very long time ago but I was very impressed and I never have forgot it. To be honest, even though I have watched many other movies directed by Fellini, very often, it didnāt really connect with them, even some massive classics like āLa Dolce Vitaā and ā8 Ā½ā. I mean, I did like them and I could see why they were considered masterpieces but they simply didnāt really blow me away. This movie is an exception though and it remains my favorite one among his work. Indeed, with this movie, you still have the poetic side of Fellini but this feature is also pretty realistic and I just loved this combination. In 2013, I went to see it again in the theater with some uncles and aunts who have formed a film club and I had a wonderful time. Unfortunately, I had a bad night sleep the night before and I could barely stay awake during the last 30 minutes but still what a great picture. This time, I was above all impressed by Giulietta Masina. I mean, Anthony Quinn was really good as well but Masina really stole the show portraying some kind of female Charles Chaplin character. To conclude, even though it is almost 60 years old, it remains a great classic, it is absolutely worth a look and a must see for any movie lover.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 09:42
(A review of Best Laid Plans)Honestly, I wasnāt sure what to expect from this flick but since I have a weak spot for Reese Witherspoon, I thought I might as well give it a try. Eventually, I thought it was not bad at all. Indeed, Reese Witherspoon and Josh Brolin are both some very watchable actors and they both delivered some decent perfomances. Concerning Alessandro Nivola, I'm not so crazy about the guy, I mean, he is not really a bad actor but he never really impressed me in anything. Concerning the story, I thought it was alright and quite entertaining, even though they couldn't avoid some annoying twist at the end which was rather disappointing. Indeed, basically, it is one of those thrillers which build up a nice mood and a nice sense of mystery, pretty much like a neo-film noir but, then, at some point, they had to explain more or less what was going on and thatās when the whole thing fell apart. In fact, Roger Ebert thought it was even really underwhelming but I thought it was still fairly well made and rather enjoyable. To conclude, it was nothing really great whatsoever but I still think it is worth a look though, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 09:38
(A review of Slow Burn (2005))Even though it is a really obscure flick, since there was a rather nice cast, I was quite eager to check it out. Eventually, I thought that the whole thing was quite underwhelming and a big waste of time for all the talented actors involved. Indeed, the cast was pretty (Ray Liotta, LL Cool J, Mekhi Phifer, Taye Diggs, Chiwetel Ejiofor,) and they did what they could with this material but the story was just too weak, in my opinion. Indeed, basically, it is one of those very convoluted thrillers which keep you in the dark for as long as possible but then, at some point, to solve most of the issues/conflicts, they just throw one preposterous twist after the other but I stopped to care way before the end was reached. The only positive thing in this flick was maybe to discover Jolene Blalock who looked quite charming and she maybe hoped that this movie would really launch her career but since it was a huge flop, she didnāt get much attention eventually. To conclude, I have seen worse but it still remain a seriously underwhelming thriller and I donāt think it is really worth a look, even if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 09:26
(A review of Nomads)This is the very first flick directed by John McTiernan, it was the main reason why I wanted to watch this and it took me a few years to finally get my hands on it. Eventually, even though it is a really obscure flick (only a handful of users in Listal have seen it apparently), there were many things to enjoy in this movie. Indeed, the mood was pretty good, Pierce Brosnan was rather convincing and there was something quite fascinating about this concept of modern urban nomads. To be honest, I thought it was not bad at all but still nothing really amazing though. Indeed, it felt like a typical directing debut, full of interesting ideas but still really rough on the edges. A year later, McTiernan would make 'Predator', followed quickly by 'Die Hard' and 'The Hunt for Red October', all 3 movies characterized by some really focused and effective directing so you could argue that this 1st feature was some kind of warm-up for this director . To conclude, in spite of its flaw, I still think it is an interesting feature and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you wonder how McTiernan started his career.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 13 years, 9 months ago on 16 May 2011 09:22
(A review of There's Only One Jimmy Grimble)Honestly, since it is a really obscure feature, I wasnāt sure what to expect from it but since Robert Carlyle and Ray Winstone were involved, I thought I might as well give it a try. Indeed, in my opinion, Carlyle and Winstone are both some reliable actors (even though it has been quite a while since I have seen anything really amazing starring Robert Carlyle) and they usually deliver some good performances. For this movie, they did a good job as well. Obviously, it remains a rather standard familly feature but thanks to those guys, it became much more enjoyable. Furthermore, it is basically a rather small production without any pretention and, as many British comedies, there is a rather depressing barren social background but I enjoyed the fact that the makers didnāt pretend that they were telling a life-changing tale. Indeed, it is a simple story about some genuine people and if you like football, or even English football, it is actually quite entertaining. To conclude, it is nothing really great or original, but I still think it is worth a look, especially if you have some young children and you want to watch something which doesn't completely bore you to death.
0 comments, Reply to this entry