data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca8df/ca8dffac910c74635908c3cb776a3fa03125bf6d" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 15 April 2011 09:19
(A review of
Married to the Mob)
I wasnât sure what to expect from this flick but since I have weak spot for Jonathan Demmeâs work, I was quite eager to check this movie. On top of that, there was a really nice cast (Michelle Pfeiffer, Alec Baldwin, Matthew Modine, Oliver Platt, Dean Stockwell, Nancy Travis) so I thought it could be an interesting watch. Apparently, when it was released, it received some pretty good reviews but, to be honest, I thought it was a rather peculiar comedy and Iâm not sure I really enjoyed it. I mean, it is basically a really goofy farce, almost a parody of your usual gangter features, there were some really over-the-top characters and Iâm afraid it was a little too daft for my taste. Still even though it wasnât really my kind of comedy, I have to admit that there were still some good things here. For example, Michelle Pfeiffer was as charming as always, she gave an acclaimed lead performance and there is no doubt that the whole thing was quite original. To conclude, even though it wasnât really a great picture, it was still an decent feature and it is definitely worth a look though, especially if you are interested in Jonathan Demmeâs work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e22f/7e22f45a480497a9d2244d4e3afb4a1ef2ee3d50" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 15 April 2011 09:13
(A review of
1408)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since the ratings were pretty decent, I thought I might as well check it out. To be honest, I'm not a big fan of those supernatural Stephen King stories but, I have to admit it, this movie was actually rather well made. Personally, I find it difficult to take such a prespoterous story really seriously but even though there was nothing remotely extraordinary happening in this movie, I thought it was still pretty entertaining. Indeed, the whole thing looked pretty good and John Cusack gave a solid performance. Thatâs the issue with this kind of movies, you have to stop your brain for the whole duration and enjoy the mood and the weird stuff going on on the screen (not really my strongest point, to be honest) and then it is actually a fun ride but like most of the fantastical works coming from Stephen King, I find it rather shallow and I would rather have something more substancial like âStand by Meâ ot âThe Shawshank Redemptionâ. Still, to conclude, even though Iâm not a huge fan, I have to admit that it is actually a decent flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc744/bc744c33ee6a1a7e38cb836cc1be74bc133bd0a2" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 15 April 2011 09:06
(A review of
Volunteers (1985))
Honestly, I wasnât expecting much from this flick since I have a weak spot for Tom Hanks, I thought I might as well check it out. Basically, it was one of those typical Tom Hanks comedies he used to make at the beginning of his career, the kind of movies he used to make before showing up âPhiladelphiaâ and before becoming a famous dramatic actor. Nowadays, this flick is pretty much forgotten and it is mostly remembered as the movie during which Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson started their romance which is still going strong 30 years later. It says a lot about the quality of the movie itself. Basically, they wanted to make some kind of spoofs about the peace corps and even though the director Nicholas Meyer thought it was a great idea, I thought it was a rather lame concept. They also made some fun of âLawrence of Arabiaâ and âThe Bridge on the River Kwaiâ but those attempts were just as underwhelming as the rest. In its genre, it is definitely not the best thing Tom Hanks did back then when he was just starting up and you should watch it only if you are a big fan of his work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6342/c6342643db06dd9b088c9b81f6f3474bc7a97891" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 15 April 2011 08:46
(A review of
The Ex)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a really nice cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, to be honest, it is not very often that I came across such a lame comedy wasting such talented actors. Indeed, I always had a weak spot for Zach Braff, Jason Bateman and Amanda Peet but there was no way that they could make this work. I mean, right from the start, the whole concept of the guy faking to be handicapped felt more misguided than really funny and the makers never managed to turn this into something really entertaining. Concerning Zach Braff, I have to admit it that I have actually never seen âScrubsâ but I really loved âGarden Stateâ and since âThe Last Kissâ turned out to be actually not bad at all, I hoped that this movie would be at least a decent watch but it turned out to be a huge disappointment. Concerning the lovely Amanda Peet, it would unfortunately be another misguided choice and she would slowly disappear during the following 10 years. Anyway, to conclude, even though I have seen worse, it was still a pretty weak comedy and I donât think it is really worth a look.Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2968f/2968fe82a136633bebbe58e58dd7074623689ab2" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 15 April 2011 08:39
(A review of
Milk)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I had this movie on DVD, I was quite eager to check it out again.To be honest, before watching this movie, I have to admit that, even though I had had heard about Harvey Milk, I didnât know much about the guy so, only for this, it was an incredibly valuable picture that allowed me to get more acquainted with this fascinating man. Concerning the movie itself, sure, it turned to be a rather straightforward biopic but the material was so strong that it didn't bother me. As a result, it is probably one of the most accessible movies delivered by Gus Van Sant so far but, at least, it was miles better than the rather overrated 'Good Will Hunting' which is still considered by IMDb as his best movie. Back then, everybody was pretty much expecting Mickey Rourke to win the Academy Award for the Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role for his amazing performance in 'The Wrestler'Â but Sean Penn eventually did win the damned thing. Well, even though some might think he robbed Rourke of a well deserved Academy award, I thought he was still impressive in this movie and he showed again that he was, at the time, one of the best actors around. Anyway, to conclude, it was a really strong biopic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Harvey Milk.Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a925/3a925a466a912935acb29fa3fa4e8d15b81135fa" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 13 April 2011 11:36
(A review of
The Nanny Diaries)
Even though I didn't have some really high expectations for this movie, unfortunately, it still turned out to be disappointing. In fact, it is only after watching the damned thing that I discovered that the directors (Shari Springer Berman & Robert Pulcini) were also responsible for the awesome 'American Splendor'. Basically, 'American Splendor' was an original, gripping, spellbinding little indie gem whereas this second directing effort was just lazy, unimaginative and seriously tedious to watch. Indeed, in spite of the interesting cast (Scarlett Johansson, Laura Linney, Paul Giamatti, Alicia Keys), I was rather bored by the whole thing. In fact, I thought that two characters  involved were just completely despicable (Mr X and Mrs X). I have noticed that Roger Ebert was slightly more more enthousiast about it than I was but I thought the whole thing was just downright average. Fortunately, after this movie, Shari Springer Berman & Robert Pulcini would deliver 'The Extra man' which has been praised by some of my favorite listal members so I will definitely check it out at some point. Anyway, to conclude, I still think this movie had some potential but, at the end of the day, it remains a really average flick and it is not really worth a look whatsoever.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8d89/a8d89a292609687c3965289762b7d645e0c609db" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 13 April 2011 08:40
(A review of
The King's Speech (2010))
To be honest, even though I heard some pretty good things about this flick, I have to admit that I didn't have some very high expectations concerning this movie. Indeed, even he fact that it was chosen as the best movie of the year by the Academy of Motion Picture didn't mean, for me, that it was actually an actual masterpiece. In my opinion, the Academy voters have always been suckers for such historical true stories. Eventually, I have to admit that it was, indeed, a rather impressive movie. Basically, the directing was pretty good but most of all, I was blown away by the performance provided by Colin Firth and he definitely deserved his oscar. Geoffrey Rush was amazing as well and they both fascinated me throughout the whole thing. Of course, the plot was hardly original (they started with an issue which seemed unsolvable, they struggled a little bit, they found a solution, there were some complications but, at the end, everything was fine...) but it was very well told and it was quite efficient. To conclude, it is a very well made historical drama with a top cast and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdaeb/bdaebd918c145e563c1a28b1163431b3465e746f" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 12 April 2011 10:58
(A review of
Grizzly Man)
Since I kept hearing some really good things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. On top of that, I have noticed that Werner Herzog had built up a pretty good reputation as a documentary maker so I had some rather high expectations concerning this fim. Eventually, I wasnât disappointed and, in fact, it must be one of the most peculiar documentaries I have ever seen. Indeed, the story it was based on was quite interesting but I believed that the movie about this tale was actually even more fascinating. Herzog succeeded in giving a fascinating muti-faceted portrait of this man, Timothy Treadwell, and the whole thing was quite an achievement. Indeed, Treadwell is shown sometimes as a heroic environmentalist but then also as a crazy paranoid megalomaniac. When watching this picture, you basically witness how he first loses contact with his own humanity and then literally loses his own life, gets his girlfriend killed and also the bears he was supposedly protecting. Eventually, you never really sure if you should pity or admire this man but there is no denying that there was something quite fascinating about him. To conclude, I thought it was a spellbinding picture and it is a definitely worth a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecf9b/ecf9b964fdab8aae4d63a6b1ad4ac564f770bc6d" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 12 April 2011 10:48
(A review of
The Terrorists)
Honestly, it is quite an obscure movie (I was only the 3rd user to rate this flick and not even 10 listal members have seen it apparently) but since I always had a weak spot for Sean Connery, I was quite eager to check it out. You should not to mix it up with the movie of the same anme directed by Ron Howard and it is actually a rather well done thriller with a solid perfomance by Sean Connery. I have to admit it, it was rather weird to see this legendary actor playing someone from Scandinavia with his usual Scottish accent so Connery didnât really convince but he compensated with his amazing charisma. Concerning the plot, it wasn't really original but it wasn't bad at all and I thought it was fairly entertaining. It was also funny to see Ian McShane almost 30 years before he finally got his big breakthrough with âDeadwoodâ (thatâs what I call a really late bloomer). To conclude, even though it was nothing really amazing and even though it is completely forgotten nowadays, I thought it was still a decent thriller and, if you're a fan of Sean Conneryâs work, it is definitely worth a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2c65/b2c65f4e7a025d5e85ed8384a0cf7ba91b819731" alt=""
Posted : 13 years, 10 months ago on 12 April 2011 07:36
(A review of
Donkey Punch)
At some point, I came across this movie, I had never heard of anything like a âDonkey Punchâ before and, as a result, probably because Iâm a closeted pervert, I got really intrigued by this movie. So, I really didn't know what to expect from this flick but the beginning turned out to be actually quite promising. Indeed, the general progression was not bad at all until the expected moment which was, after all, rather underwhelming. I mean, do you really believe that someone could die like this?!? I mean, if they picked up a huge guy maybe it would have been more believable but, instead, they picked up the smallest boy from this group... Anyway, after this fatal scene,  the movie became just more and more tedious to watch and, very fast, I kind of lost all interest in the damned thing. On top of that, I didnât help that the involved actors were not really good. Itâs really too bad because the steamy tension at the beginning was actually rather well done but I really had a hard time to care about the rest of the movie. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of a promising concept, it was unfortunately poorly developed and I donât think it is really worth a look.Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry