data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34ac/b34ac222d54f2ec6f9b95363cea2ebdb8383d938" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 03:00
(A review of
Adaptation. (2002))
I already saw this movie, in fact, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released, but since it was such a long time ago, I was really eager to check it out again. In fact, I do remember quite well when it came out. Indeed, back then, âBeing John Malkovichâ had become a big cult-classic but, to be honest, even though I did like how wild and original it was, it didnât completely convince me. However, with this follow-up, Spike Jonze and Charlie Kaufman really managed to blow me away. Indeed, it was once again a really wild and surrealist tale but, in contrary to âBeing John Malkovichâ, it managed to keep my attention until the very end. Seriously, I donât think I haver seen a movie managing so well to mix fiction and reality. You could say that the makers already tried something similar with âBeing John Malkovichâ but it worked much better here and the end-result was just spellbinding. For example, I just loved how Charlie Kaufman created a fictitious twin brother who also got credited for writing this movie. I know a lot of people trash Nicolas Cage and it is true that most of his recent movies were completely worthless but, back in those days, he gave a hell of a double performance for this movie. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a581/2a58109520663efd32a5470822dfcb34133503a4" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 02:47
(A review of
Whale Rider)
Since I kept hearing really good things about this flick, I was really eager to check it out. Well, first of all, I think it is important to point that, in my opinion, most movies involving kids or teenagers are usually rather uninspired and sugar-coated. In fact, there are honestly usually a waste of time, even for the children who happened to be their target audience. However, there are a few exceptions though and this movie is definitely one of them. Indeed, to start with the story was riveting but the performances (above all by Keisha Castle-Hughes which I hope to see more in the future) were all impressive. Basically, it was a very interesting movie about the clash between tradition and evolution. The best thing about this movie was that it was never condescending and the makers always managed to avoid taking up the easy way avoiding blandness and stereotypes. As a result, they delivered one of the most striking study of teenage anxiety intermingled with a fascinating view of where the Maori culture stands in our modern world. Anyway, to conclude, I really liked this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre or if you are interested in this subject.Â
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c6a5/1c6a5943779a5cbe48493e731b8ced624e3422bd" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 02:35
(A review of
The Pianist)
Roman Polanski is one of my favorite directors and still in the 2000's he keeps making great pictures. Indeed, this story was harrowing and Adrien Brody also gave a huge performance (what happened to him ? Seven years later, starring in "Predators'... What the f*ck!). Still, I have to admit it, at first, when I saw that this movie was the best Polanski has made, according to the Imdb ratings, I used to scratch my head a little bit. I mean, do the people have any idea what this guy had done previously in his career? However, I have re-watched it recently and, indeed, I have to agree, it is a great movie, one of Polanski's best, and absolutely a great achievement. Apparently, for many years, he was toying with the idea about making a movie about this subject and even Spielberg asked him to direct 'Schindler's list' but, since he was himself a holocaust survivor, he felt really uncomfortable with this topic for many years which is quite understandable. Eventually, at 70 years old, when he felt that the time was right, he finally made his own movie about the holocaust, a heartbreaking true tale of another survivor, and he managed to make one of the best movies in this genre. To conclude, it is a very good war drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Polanski's work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74a4f/74a4f27aec072a22b882f593b18754532f75da08" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 02:27
(A review of
Hero (2002))
To be honest, nowadays, I donât watch many Asian movies and thatâs a real shame because some of them are truly awesome and much better than most of the garbage I usually watch. This flick is probably one of the last Asian flicks that I have seen that truly blew me away. Recently, I have re-watched it with my step-son. Honestly, I don't know why but I thought it could be a fun movie to watch with him. Eventually, I'm afraid he wished there were more fighting scenes and I think the poor fellow was rather bored by the whole thing. Anyway, just like the previous times I watched it, I really loved it. To be honest, I'm not big fan of Jet Li and this movie is probably the only one he made that I really enjoyed. Basically, the story was really entertaining but, most of all, it has to be one of the most gorgeous movies I have ever seen. Indeed, every single scene was basically a beautiful canvas and the whole movie was an impressive combination of sword fighting, music, calligraphy, conspiracies and love intrigues. It also reminded me of another great Asian movie, 'Rashomon', in the way that the same events are showed from 3 different perspectives. To conclude, I loved this flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Asian movies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89e48/89e48d96adbac7723910ed405bd44813202f26f2" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 02:20
(A review of
Infernal Affairs)
I was fortunate enough to see this movie before 'The Departed'. I remember, back in those days, I kept hearing about this flick so I was really eager to check it out. I first missed it when it was on TV but then managed to borrow the DVD from my sister and I was seriously not disappointed. In my opinion, even if Scorsese's version was pretty good, I easily prefer this movie anyway. Indeed, the directing was really impressive, there was some great acting provided by the whole cast, especially by Tony Leung (my favorite Asian actor) and Andy Lau and, above all, I thought the story was completely fascinating. I preferred this version because the directing was less flashy and they didn't try to explain verbally every single actions. Here, the behavior and body language of the protagonists were enough and expanded the fascinating aspect provided by this mesmerizing flick. Personally, except for providing a new set, the US version didn't add much to the whole thing and even though it is indeed a pretty good remake, it still feel like a rather unnecessary US remake just like 'The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo' directed by David Fincher. To conclude, this original version is basically one of the best Asian movies I have ever seen and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you enjoyed the American remake.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/289f8/289f8cbec415fc613830d3e6bff43a3798b2322c" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 12:59
(A review of
American Splendor)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back and since I have it on DVD, I was really eager to check it out again. First of all, Back in the 90âs, Paul Giamatti was one of those guys you would spot very often in a movie, always playing a supporting character, usually delivering a good performance but you never knew his name and the guy was simply completely overlooked. However, it all changed with this brilliant movie. Indeed, for once, Giamatti had the lead and he completely rocked (a year later, he would finally seal the deal with another brilliant lead performance in âSidewaysâ). Anyway, coming back to our main feature, to be honest, I have actually never read the comic book but I still really enjoyed this movie anyway. Even though the acting and the directing were both pretty good too, in my opinion, the main quality was above all the fact that Harvey Pekar was a really interesting figure. I mean, he is not really a good guy, not really a bad guy either, just a rather average fellow who happens to be pissed off against the whole world, at least most of it. I donât know, some people just donât like this kind of cynical over-negative attitude but I really dig it and, in this case, it created a really hilarious viewing. When I was living in France, I used to live next to the public library and I would get about 5 comic-books from there on almost a daily basis. So, I read a whole bunch of those comic-books but I never read âAmerican Splendorâ and I would really love to read one of those at some point. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved this movie and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc7d2/cc7d2ec58cbf10ac1cf9717d6f8f06ac22d4b9bd" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 12:57
(A review of
Mystic River)
I already saw this movie but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, back in those days, Clint Eastwoodâs directing career was going through a rather weak stage which started at the end of the 90âs with the underwhelming âAbsolute Powerâ and, after a long string of disappointing movies, Eastwood made a major come-back with this flick. Eventually, it seems that this movie was eclipsed by the success of âMillion Dollar Babyâ which would be released a year later but, personally, I think it easily belongs to Clint Eastwoodâs best directing efforts. Itâs interesting that, while I was rewatching the damned thing, I noticed, that even if the story was decent, it was in fact nothing really amazing though. Eventually, what made this movie really fascinating was the attention they gave on the characters who were are all flawed and complex. Eventually, there were so many scenes during which I thought the charactersâ actions and feelings were rather dubious and, yet, each time, I could understand why they would make such choices with sometimes some really dramatic consequences. On top of that, you had here a great director at the top of his game with a very strong cast (Sean Penn, Kevin Bacon, Tim Robbins, Laurence Fishburne, Marcia Gay Harden, Laura Linney, Emmy Rossum). Furthermore, it was really gritty and Eastwood definitely didnât sugar-coat the damned thing. In fact, during the opening scene, my wife was slightly pissed off because it seemed to be too hardcore for her taste (she eventually really enjoyed this movie though). Many people actually consider this movie as Eastwoodâs last great masterpiece and they might actually be right. Anyway, to conclude, it is a very strong drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Clint Eastwoodâs work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6fdb/a6fdbc0dbd72c07f5737cdbc2f9ac78fc714c47d" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 12:41
(A review of
The Barbarian Invasions (2003))
Even though I have left France more than 10 years ago, I still try to watch some French(-speaking) movies once in a while. I'm particularly interested in the movies which won the César of the Best French movie (the French equivalent for the Oscars). Actually, this movie is Canadian but, somehow, it was still qualified to win this prize. Anyway, it was a very good drama, dealing with life and death, and the cast, made of actors unknown to me at that time, was really impressive. To be honest, I'm rather oblivious about Denys Arcand's work (so far, it is the only movie he has directed that I have seen) but I will definitely check his other features. As I really liked this sequel, I'm really curious about the original movie 'Le Déclin de l'empire américain' and I hope I will manage to watch it as some point. Apparently, it involves the same characters played by the same actors but 15 years before. Anyway, this movie can easily be watched as stand alone as it was quite spellbinding. To conclude, it is a rather heartbreaking story, a really solid drama and it is definitely worth it, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6680a/6680ada2a9b8312e533c82a47eac1b31f35dd1ee" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 12:33
(A review of
Monster (2003))
It has been a while since I have watched this flick and I should re-watch it at some point but there is no denying that this movie really impressed me the first time around. Back then, everybody was floored by Charlize Theron who had a solid career so far but thanks to this movie, she definitely reached another level. And, indeed, Theron gave a fearless performance which went beyond getting a few pounds (she actually gained 30 pounds) and getting a prosthetic nose. What was really impressive about her performance was how deep she went in developing her characterâs messed up psychological state. Basically, Theron completely disappeared behind the character which is what every actor should try to attain. Still, this movie is not just about this performance, it is also one of the best movies dealing with a serial killer. Indeed, Iâm not a huge fan of the genre (too many stupid twist endings and far-fetched plots in my opinion) but, this one, by focusing on the serial killer and show her as an average (albeit messed-up) human being, was much more compelling. I mean, when you get to see Wuornos as a young teenager getting in some cars with some strangers and being dumped a while later, it was quite bleak and heartbreaking. To conclude, I think it is a really amazing flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a0bf/2a0bfb6ecbf5a92b221aa65ff75abda39b4d2afa" alt=""
Posted : 14 years ago on 31 January 2011 11:49
(A review of
Elephant (2003))
Ever since I have heard about this flick, I became really eager to check it out. Indeed, Gus van Sant is a very good director and I always had a weak spot for his work but, to be honest, not all his movies have been completely successful (As a matter of fact, âGood Will Huntingâ, his biggest success at the box-office, is actually rather overrated in my opinion). Fortunately, this movie really didnât disappoint me. Indeed, basically, it is quite a shocking story told in a very particular way and you might find this approach rather unappealing but I thought it was in fact actually quite fascinating. I'm pretty sure that many viewers would find this movie frustrating because, while watching this, you have so many questions coming up in your mind but, eventually, no real answer at all is provided by this movie. Personally, I really loved the fact that you had to think about the movie and the events themselves on your own to find yourself the answers. I have to admit it though, the whole thing is terribly cold and distant (a little bit like Michael Hanekeâs work as a matter of fact) so it is an acquired taste. To conclude, I thought it was a really fascinating flick and I think it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in Gus Van Santâs work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0472e/0472e5f5d8d221e0dc7190060c0b378e728c29a4" alt=""
0 comments,
Reply to this entry