When I first heard that Steven Spielberg was coming up with a remake of this legendary classic musical, I canāt say I was really excited by this idea. However, even though it was a box-office flop, it turned out to be a huge critical success and, since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out after all. Well, even though the original āWest Side Storyā is one of the very few musicals that I really enjoyed, to be honest, I really struggled to care about this remake though. Sure, there was no doubt that it was technically fine, the whole thing was visually very well done and Ansel Elgort and Rachel Zegler had a solid chemistry. However, it still felt rather pointless to come up with another really faithful adaptation of the famous stage musical. Indeed, the 1961 version was already quite faithful but above all it was already pretty much downright amazing. Of course, they tweaked some elements, the most obvious and welcome update was to have a completely Latino cast to play the Sharks and other Puerto Rican characters. However, even in this case, they could have gone further by casting some actual teenagers as, except for Rachel Zegler, all the actors were still much older than their respective characters. Anyway, even though the critics were super enthusiast, as far as I was concerned, this new version felt rather redundant and the fact that this movie (and the older version) are really long probably didnāt help. I can understand the appeal for Spielberg to finally direct a musical, one of the very few genres he never tackled yet in his career but imagine if, in 2060, some heralded director would decide to remake the āLord of the Ringsā trilogy just because he loved it so much back then when he was a kid? Anyway, to conclude, even if I wasnāt really sold by the damned thing, it was still a very well made old-fashioned musical and it is worth a look, even if the whole thing felt rather pointless, at least, to me.Ā
A good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 4 March 2022 02:33 (A review of West Side Story)0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 3 March 2022 10:29 (A review of She's Funny That Way)To be honest, I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since there was a nice cast involved, I thought I might as well check it out. On top of that, it was also Peter Bogdanovichās final directorial effort but it seems that Bogdanovichās career did end up with a whimper, Iām afraid. Basically, I turned out to be some kind of mix of a 30ās screwball comedy with a Woody Allenās feature filled up with neurotic characters. Sure, it might sound appealing but not only it felt outdated but, above all, it was just rather boring. Furthermore, I thought that there was something rather misguided about handling the fact that this Broadway director was basically cheating on his wife with some escorts in every US city he did visit as if it was a big joke. Itās not that it was shocking, itās just that it wasnāt really funny at all. Another issue was that even though some of the characters were not bad, there were just way too many involved and, with a running time of barely 90 mins, there was obviously no time to develop any of them. For example, the whole thing started with the connection between this Broadway director and this prostitute and, yet, they barely spent any time together, even after they started to work on the same play. Instead of developing this relationship, they kept bringing other escorts who were apparently also āinspiredā by him as if it was supposed to be hilarious but it made him rather sleazy. On top of that, it made the whole thing seriously random but thatās something that could be said about all the interactions involving any of these characters. Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing was rather harmless, it was also really tedious and I donāt think it is really worth a look.Ā
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 2 March 2022 11:09 (A review of The Tinder Swindler)To be honest, I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since the story sounded intriguing and since it was on Netflix, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, I have to admit that it turned out to be quite an entertaining documentary. Sure, maybe it wasnāt really educational but it was a fun watch and the way they mixed the whole thing with some thriller elements was actually quite effective. First of all, I have never used Tinder (Iāve been in a relationship for almost 20 years so no need, I guess) but this documentary certainly didnāt make this app attractive, at least, not to me. Eventually, with Tinder but also similar apps, the issue is that it seems that most men are seriously distracted by sex or the idea of having sex while women are seriously distracted by materialism. Indeed, how could you otherwise explain that these 3 women (and probably countless others) fell for exactly the same pictures and exactly the same speeches? Concerning Simon Leviev A.K.A. Shimon Hayut, well, you can say whatever you want about the guy but I thought he was actually quite a brilliant con artist, even if there were some flaws in his scheme. Indeed, if I understand it correctly, it implied that he would have to constantly spend the money he was defrauding without building up a safety net in case everything would go south which was bound to happen at some point. Still, even though I understand why Cecilie FjellhĆøy and Ayleen Charlotte would give him some money, I thought it was much more difficult to understand why Pernilla Sjƶholm did it. I mean, Cecilie and Ayleen were after all completely in love with the guy so I think itās understandable that you would do such a thing for your partner. However, why you would give so much money to a āgoodā friend that you have known for maybe a few months? At least, it was actually pretty cool to see these 3 women teaming up to bring him down, even if he would then spend only 5 months in an Israeli jail. Anyway, to conclude, even if the damned thing was nothing really ground-breaking, it was still a solid documentary and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Ā
0 comments, Reply to this entry
An average movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 1 March 2022 08:04 (A review of All I See Is You)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 24 February 2022 02:11 (A review of Spider-Man: No Way Home)I already saw this movie but since I just bought a brand new awesome TV, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, Iām really glad I watched it again since I was much more able to enjoy it the 2nd time around. Eventually, I understand why it was such a massive box-office success when it was released and, after all, it is easily the best MCU instalment released during the Phase 4. Indeed, I liked the direct link with the previous movie (and even more the links with all the previous Spider-Man installments) and the fact that Peter Parker wanted to get back his anonymity wasnāt a bad idea at all. In fact, I think the main issue was actually Doctor Strange. Indeed, the guy is such a mighty wizard that he can do pretty much whatever he wants with some fancy spell done in a few minutes. As a result, even though the idea of Peter Parker facing some existential crisis was really interesting, it was undone by a seemingly simple magic trick which drastically lowered the stakes. Still, it was definitely really neat to see them bringing back all these characters from the previous Spider-Man movies. Furthermore, of course, I was pretty obvious that Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield would show up but I thought they would come up just for only a quick scene but I didnāt expect them to get so involved which was really cool. Finally, this movie probably had the most disappointing end-credit scenes I have seen so far in the MCU. Indeed, the first one pretty much cancelled the entrance of Eddie Brock in the MCU which was announced only a couple of months ago in āVenom: Let There Be Carnageā. Sure, Venom might show up eventually but it will be in a different form and Brock, especially Tom Hardy, will be terribly missed. However, the 2nd scene was actually even more disappointing though. Indeed, it was pretty obvious that this movie would be linked to the next Doctor Strange sequel but, instead of giving us a nice little scene bridging the two movies, they gave us an actual trailer for āDoctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madnessā which was just so lame and lazy. Anyway, to conclude, even if Iām still not sure if it was really amazing, the damned thing was still seriously entertaining and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 23 February 2022 01:23 (A review of Gimme Shelter)Since it kept hearing some pretty good things about this flick, I was quite eager to check it out. To be honest, the fact that I didnāt know much about the Rolling Stones and what happened during this infamous concert before watching this movie made it rather difficult for me to get a good grip on the damned thing. Indeed, it actually took me forever to figure out that the concert footage at the beginning had actually nothing to do with the Altamont Free Concert and was in fact taken during some previous concert in the Madison Square Garden. There was also some footage showing the Rolling Stones at work for some songs for their coming-up album āSticky Fingersā but, to be honest, it all felt rather random. However, there is no denying that the scenes involving the Altamont Concert were actually quite fascinating to behold or seriously disturbing might actually be more accurate. Indeed, back in 1969, Woodstock turned out to be arguably the best concert ever filmed, well, the very same year, the Altamont Free Concert might turn out to be the worst concert ever filmed. Should we blame the promoters who switched location just a day before the concert was planned? Should we blame the Hells Angels for poisoning the mood right from the start and creating a really antagonizing atmosphere not only with the audience but also with the bands performing? Should we blame the Stones for even considering a biker gang to provide the security for such a massive concert? Eventually, not only it was a milestone as this event was considered as the end of the Flower Power era but I think it also completely changed how concerts would be managed in the future. Indeed, can you imagine a free concert with 300 000 people with a stage only a meter high, no gates between the stage and the audience, no check at the entrance and a security composed of unprofessional goons probably all drunk? In fact, it is more surprising that something even more dramatic didnāt happen before at Woodstock or any other massive music festival. Anyway, nowadays, when you go to a concert, there is tons of security involved including a big distance between you and the performers which is not very intimate but, at least, it is much safer for everyone involved. Finally, the most stunning scene in this movie was probably when you get to see Mick Jagger actually watching the footage of a man pointing out a gun and then being savagely stabbed to death by one of the Hell Angels while Jagger himself was actually trying to perform on stage. Seriously, it was so surreal and it felt like watching a snuff movie with this Rock and Roll legend. Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing turned out to be seriously dark and disturbing and if you are curious about the most messed-up concert that ever took place, you should definitely check this movie.Ā
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 22 February 2022 12:08 (A review of Missing Link (2019))I wasnāt really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was the last movie produced by Laika, I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, Iām hardly surprised that it turned out to be a flop at the box-office. I mean, the animation was, as usual, quite amazing but I wouldnāt expect less from these guys, though I wish they didnāt use so much CGI mixed with their state-of-the-art stop-motion animation. The main issue was that it was easily their most generic story so far. The fact that there were so many animated movies dealing with yetis in a very short time period (see also āSmallfootā and āAbominableā) probably didnāt help. Still, even without this competition, this movie would still have struggled to find an audience, Iām afraid, and I'm not sure if it really deserved a better reception. Anyway, as far as Iām concerned, what really saved the whole thing was this Mr. Link character. Indeed, while all the other characters were just never really interesting and/or entertaining, this Sasquatch creature was actually quite hilarious. Through the whole duration, I kept wondering who was voicing him and itās only afterwards that I discovered that it was actually Zach Galifianakis who was behind this voice. I wish I could say the same about the main character voiced by Hugh Jackman (who I did instantly recognize) but even though Jackman did a fine job, I just didnāt care much about his character. Concerning Adelina Fortnight, the 3rd character involved in this adventure, it was actually even worse as she joined them completely randomly and provided very little added value after all. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it thought it was still a decent watch and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre but, to be honest, I hope that Laika will really come up with a better story the next time around.
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A bad movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 21 February 2022 08:58 (A review of Getaway)To be honest, I wasnāt expecting much from this movie but since it was starring Ethan Hawke, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, the damned thing turned out to really weak, in fact, it was probably the worse movie I have seen so far starring Hawke. Seriously, itās the kind of movie during which they did blow up some power plant in some rather convoluted scene and, yet, afterwards, the lights were still onĀ everywhere in this city.Ā To make things worse, it was apparently not at all needed for them to be onsite since it could have disabled remotely. Of course, I understand that it was supposed to be a non-stop action flick and I did like the idea of a guy doing some tasks as if he was in some real version of āGrand Theft Autoā. However, the first mistake they made was to force the main character to go through all these tasks against his will which is such a lame approach. Even more problematic was that the action scenes (which did represent 99% of the running time) were just poorly put together. Above all, the rapid-fire editing was just so awful and made these scenes borderline incomprehensible. Seriously, there were as much as or maybe even more than 10 cuts within 30 seconds which was pretty much headache-inducing. Concerning Ethan Hawke, it is pretty obvious that he didnāt care much about the damned thing and got involved because he could do some cool stunts with some very cool car. Concerning Selena Gomez whose character was dropped in this tale completely randomly, I wonder what could have been the appeal for her. Maybe she should get another agent? Anyway, to conclude, the damned thing was a big waste of time and you should probably avoid it.Ā
0 comments, Reply to this entry
A very good movie
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 20 February 2022 09:00 (A review of The Worst Person in the World)0 comments, Reply to this entry
A classic
Posted : 2 years, 10 months ago on 19 February 2022 07:57 (A review of The Goddess)0 comments, Reply to this entry