
Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 10:46
(A review of
The Informant!)
Honestly, I really wonder how I thought it would be a cool movie to watch with my wife at the movie theater. I guess the whole thing was actually poorly advertised since I first thought it would be more a straightforward thriller. On the other hand, it is such a weird picture, so how can you sell it to any audience? Anyway, even though it was something really different than I expected, I still liked it but it is definitely not for everyone (my wife eventually fell asleep for example...). Basically, it was another rather experimental feature directed by Soderbergh and there was this weird combination of styles which I found actualy rather bewildering but also really intriguing. On top of that, Matt Damon was just amazing and I do believe that he gave here one of his most underrated performances. If you like weird movies, maybe this is for you or maybe you won't dig it all. To be honest, aftewards, you seriously wonder what Soderbergh tried to achieve here but it's a feeling you get very often when watching his work. Anyway, to conclude, even though it wasnāt really great whatsoever, I think it is still worth a look, if only for Matt Damon's impressive performance.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 10:32
(A review of
Public Enemies)
I already saw this movie, in fact, I even saw it in the movie theatre when it was released, but since it was a while back, I was quite eager to check it out. To be honest, I was expecting more from this flick. Indeed, nowadays, Johnny Depp keeps releasing some flops but, at the time, he was at the height of his popularity, making one hit after the other and many of his movies were very well received. So, when I heard that he was making a movie with Michael Mann, I thought it would be really amazing. At the time, when I first saw it, since I was a big fan of Michael Mann and of Johnny Depp, I think I had a very āgroupieā reaction and did end up overestimate the actual end-result in the process. So, it was a good thing to watch it again with slightly less worshipping of Mann and Depp going on and, indeed, it wasnāt so great after all. On the other hand, even if it didnāt turn to be such a masterpiece, I have to admit that it was still a good flick though. Indeed, the directing was solid and I didnāt really mind the fact that it was shot digitally but you wonder if the movie wouldnāt have looked better with some good old 35mm film. Furthermore, there was an impressive cast involved but the story was somehow a little bit underwhelming. In my opinion, they never really managed to make Dillinger really fascinating and even though you spend more than 2 hours with the guy, you still donāt learn much about him after all. Anyway, to conclude, my rating was actually a little bit too generous the first time around but it was still a very enjoyable and entertaining picture and anything directed by Michael Mann is always worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 10:13
(A review of
District 9 (2009))
Actually, I wasn't really interested by this flick but when I saw that it was on the IMDB top 250, I was intrigued and I thought I should give it a shot. Eventually, I thought it was a very interesting and entertaining movie. I especially enjoyed the 1st half which was just great. Then, the 2nd half was little too much action-oriented for my taste but still it was a very good and original picture. The other day I watched it again with Nick, my step-son, who really loved it and it still holds up pretty good. One of the best thing about this flick was also the main character, Wikus Van De Merwe. I mean, the guy is a total moron and I thought it was really refreshing, in contrast with all the stereopycal heroes you get in your usual commercial productions. It's too bad Wikus wasn't so interesting in the second half when, suddenly, he got himself a conscience. In my opinion, it is still rather exagerated to put this movie in the top 250 best movies ever made. I mean, it is definitely an interesting flick and it may belong to the best movies coming out in 2009 but it is definitely not a masterpiece, at least, not in my opinion. To conclude, for a directing debut, in spite its flaws, it was still pretty impressive and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 10:02
(A review of
Up in the Air)
I had already seen this movie, in fact, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released, but since it was almost 10 years ago, I was really eager to check it out again. First of all, I have noticed that the last 3 movies directed by Jason Reitman (āMen, Women & Childrenā, āLabor Dayā and āYoung Adultā) were rather poorly received and this flick was the last one he made which was actually really successful. Well, to be honest, I thought it was not as good as 'Thank you for smoking' which should get much more credit but, in my opinion, it was still much better thanĀ 'Juno'. Indeed, even thoughĀ 'Juno' was a huge critical success, as far as I was concerned,Ā it was actually rather overrated. Anyway, at the time, Jason Reitman was definitely continuing his winning streak, that's for sure. Indeed, I thought it was just a great and compelling story and George Clooney was at the top of his game back in those days. What more do you need ? The greatest thing about this flick is that even though they showed a guy with one of the most worthless jobs ever, I couldnāt help feeling sorry for this man anyway. Contrary to āJunoā which felt rather artificial and even slightly pretentious, this tale was much more convincing and really timely, especially in this time of economic crisis. To be honest, I have to admit that it was not so impressed the 2nd time around but, even so, I still think it is easily one of the best movies delivered by Jason Reitman so far. Anyway, to conclude, I enjoyed this movie a lot, it was one of the best movies released in 2009 and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 09:58
(A review of
Up)
In fact, I already saw this movie many times, I even saw it in the movie theater when it was released, but my girlfriend was quite eager to see it so I watched it again with her. It was such a great pleasure to watch this movie again though. Indeed, even if it is not my favorite from Pixar (āWall-Eā remains my favorite so far), it is still a great picture though. To be honest, I hope Pixar will make more masterpieces in the future but their more features (āBraveā, āCars 2, āMonsters Universityā, The Good Dinosaurā, āFinding Doryā, āOnwardā, ā¦) were very often rather disappointing. Not this one though. Above all, they gave us probably the best introduction I have ever seen in an animated picture. Indeed, the first ten minutes were among the most mind-blowing animated moments I have ever experienced in my life. This heartbreaking introduction was actually the best part in this feature. So daring, so emotional, only Pixar could pull something like that. After that, I have to admit it, the movie did have a hard time trying to live up to this heartbreaking start-up and it was pretty tricky to start up with the very best they had to offer but, still, I think the end-result was really impressive. Of course, the animation was just gorgeous but, above all, it is really amazing how they managed to create such a touching and entertaining story starring a grumpy old guy, a fat Asian kid, a talking dog and a weird bird. No offense but I'm still waiting from something that great ever coming from DreamWorks. Anyway, to conclude, I think it is a great achievement, one of the best animated features ever made, it is definitely worth a look and a must-see if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 09:17
(A review of
The Cove)
Since this movie had a really good reputation and since it won the Academy Award for the Best Documentary, I was quite eager to check it out. Even though I already knew what to expect, it though it was still a really heartbreaking movie. Above all, what affected me the most was to see the guy who trained Flipper and originated the whole dolphin industry, trying to make amends, seriously, that was just really sad. On the other hand, it was also pointed out, in the West, we slaughter cows and the East, well, they eat dolphins but I donāt think it is really the same after all. I mean, imagine if you would put hundreds of cows in a field and that they would be surrounded by hunters who would shot all of them on the spot. Furthermore, there is also the fact that this movie has been pretty much banned and censored in Japan showing that there must have been some elements of truth in it. On top of that, even if you put aside the controversial message, the whole thing also worked as a rather spellbinding thriller. To conclude, I thought it was a very powerful picture and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested by this subject.Ā

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 21 December 2010 09:02
(A review of
Daddy and Them)
Most of us seem to have forgotten it but Billy Bob Thornton actually had his breakthrough as a writer-director and not as an actor. Indeed, since Thornton was struggling as an actor, he decided to write and direct his own movie resulting in the impressive āSling Bladeā (he even won an Academy Award for the Best Screenplay for this moie). As a result, many expected him to have an interesting career as a director but his follow-up , the really ambitious āAll the Pretty Horsesā, was butchered in post-production and turned out to be a critical failure. Well, this movie was ThorntonāsĀ 3rd directing effort and, to be honest, I wasn't expecting much before watching the damned thing. Eventually, even though this movie was obviously much less ambitious than Thorntonās previous directing projects,Ā I thought it was actually not bad after all. I mean, sure, the story didn't really work but some of the dialogues were just hilarious. On top of that, even though the characters were all rather obnoxious, after a while, I couldnāt help thinking that they were endearing which was quite an achievement. To conclude, in spite of its flaws, I thought it was actually a decent comedy and I think it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 20 December 2010 05:28
(A review of
Scarface)
When I was a teenager, I started to watch many classics but some of them didnāt really blow me away and this movie is a good example. I donāt know, back then, I thought it was entertaining but the operatic over-the-top feeling didnāt really appeal to me at that point. Eventually, I had to watch this movie a second time (with a gap of 14 years if Iām not mistaken) to really appreciate it. Basically, it is pretty much the story of a loser from Cuba who tries to make it big in America but ends up still a loser. To start with , the makers were pretty prestigious as it was actually directed by Brian De Palma and Oliver Stone wrote the screenplay. Indeed, many tend to forget it, but before launching his own directing career, Stone did write this massive classic. In the same genre, it is definitely really different than 'The Godfather' or 'Goodfellas' but I thought it was really awesome. Even though Al Pacino plays again a gangster, his Tony Montana was completely different than his Michael Corleone and the guy was just spellbinding to watch . Indeed, Pacino was huge and very mercurial in this movie. To conclude, it is a great classic, a fascinating tale and it is definitely worth a look, even a must see for any decent movie lover.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 20 December 2010 05:05
(A review of
Platoon)
I already saw this movie but, since it was a while back, I thought I might as well check it out again. Well, after all these years, I was glad to see that the damned thing was still quite powerful and, in my opinion, it remains the best movie about the Vietnam war, no less than that. In fact, it might even be my favorite war movie. I mean, there are some other pretty good movies about the suject, like āFull Metal Jacketā for example, but this flick is just way better than the rest though. The making-off was already the stuff of legend as the actors had to spend 2 weeks in a boot camp to get into the right āmoodā and Stone made sure that all the details were accurate. Stone, who was himself a Vietnam veteran, struggled for more than a decade to manage to make this movie (he even tried to cast Jim Morrison at some point) but it was eventually a huge financial and critical success. Back then, it even won the Best Picture Academy award and Oliver Stoneās career was finally launched for good and, for a while, he was one of the most interesting American directors at work. Indeed, he kept making some really interesting pictures but they unfortunately never reached the level of this masterpiece. Coming back on our main feature, at the end of the day, it is a really fascinating and sometimes heartbreaking war tale with some fully fledged characters. Hell, there was even Johnny Depp in itā¦ What else do you need? The rest of the cast was also pretty neat (Charlie Sheen, Tom Berenger, Willem Dafoe, Forest Whitaker, Kevin Dillon). Anyway, to conclude, it is a classic, one of the best movies on this genre and it is definitely worth a look.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 14 years, 3 months ago on 20 December 2010 04:21
(A review of
Once Upon a Time in America (1984))
You know, sometimes, before watching a classic, you build up some huge expectations but when you finally watch the damned thing, especially after waiting for so many years, the end-result can let you down a little bit. Well, it didn't happen with this movie, that's for sure. Indeed, I kept hearing about it for many years and, finally, I got my hands on it and I was mesmerized from the beginning until the end. Basically, I think it is one of the best gangster movies ever made, no more, no less. Seriously, it's a shame that Leone couldn't make anymore movies after this one but, on the other hand, I'd rather have a director like him who made a handful of amazing features than someone like Woody Allen who has basically become a factory making one disappointing flick after another every single year. So, indeed, the directing was just awesome and back then, Robert de Niro was at the top of his game and gave one of his best performances. Not only Leone didn't make another movie afterwards but the story behind the making of this masterpiece was just heartbreaking. Indeed, the poor fellow spent more than a decade working on this and when it was released, it was butchered by the studio, destroyed by the critics and a huge flop at the box-office. Eventually, Sergio Leone would die 5 years later and I'm not sure if he was still alive when the whole thing was restored to its original format. Anyway, it is a great picture, a timeless classic and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry