Explore
 Lists  Reviews  Images  Update feed
Categories
MoviesTV ShowsMusicBooksGamesDVDs/Blu-RayPeopleArt & DesignPlacesWeb TV & PodcastsToys & CollectiblesComic Book SeriesBeautyAnimals   View more categories »
Listal logo
All reviews - Movies (7698) - TV Shows (10)

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 17 February 2012 10:06 (A review of Two If by Sea)

Even though she is not really a great actress whatsoever, I definitely have a weak spot for Sandra Bullock and she was the main reason why I wanted to watch this rather unknown flick. Unfortunately, I'm afraid it be must one of the worst movies she has made so far. First of all, I always found Denis Leary more obnoxious and than funny and it was even worse since he was the lead in this movie. Concerning Sandra Bullock, even though she was trying really hard and was as charming as usual, I'm afraid her character was not really interesting either. And what the story then? Basically, it was terrible tedious comedy around a heist and I couldn't care less about the whole thing. Thus, I didn't care about these characters and their predicament, they were boring and the story was boring as well. To conclude, the whole thing is just pretty bad and it is not worth a look whatsoever, even if you are a huge fan of Sandra Bullock.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A bad movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 17 February 2012 09:19 (A review of The Pacifier)

Nowadays, I have Netflix and Popcorn and not only I have since then an endless selection of movies to choose from but, as a result, I have become slightly more picky regarding the movies I watch. Before, I used to watch pretty much anything as long as it was starring one or two actors I was interested in and, as a result, I would sometimes end up watching some really obscure features. This movie was a perfect example. Obviously, I didn’t expect much from this movie but, somehow, I still ended up watchin the damned thing. In fact, the funniest thing about this movie is that, literally just minutes before I was going to watch it, I got a message from one of my dearest listal friends warning me as, and I quote, it is 'one of the most inane movies ever made'. Eventually, I'm afraid this message was the only funny thing concerning this really weak family feature and my buddy was just right. Apparently, there seems to be some kind rule saying that every major action star has to star at least once in a comedy but, except maybe for Schwarzenegger, the end result has always been dreadful and this movie was definitely not an exception. Indeed, the premise was just completely predictable and not entertaining whatsoever and, even worse, Vin Diesel, who has never been really the most skilled actor in the world, didn't have any feeling for comedy. Anyway, to conclude, the whole thing was indeed inane, boring and rather embarassing to watch and it is not worth a look whatsoever.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 16 February 2012 01:02 (A review of Austin Powers in Goldmember)

Following the success of the two previous installments, it was pretty obvious that they would round this up with a trilogy. Unfortunately, it was easily the least entertaining movie of this franchise. I mean, once again, you get the same tired old jokes and Austin Powers is really getting obnoxious. They tried to be clever by giving Beyoncé the female lead part which wasn't actually a bad idea but she was not really a match to Heather Graham or Elizabeth Hurley. The story, once again, revolves around time travelling but they should have tried something else. There are numerous cameos but they didn't add much to the story, I'm afraid. The only thing that I really enjoyed was Michael Caine, portraying Austin Powers' father. Caine was, as usual, just great and really hilarious but, a part from him, I didn't enjoy this much. To conclude, I think Austin Powers was only interesting for one movie and became a victim of his own success, it was a rather average sequel and it is not really worth a look, expect maybe if you are a huge fan of this character.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 16 February 2012 11:25 (A review of Captain America: The First Avenger)

I already saw this movie but since I just brought a brand new awesome TV, I thought I might as well rewatch it. Back then, the first time around, like everyone else, I was prepping for 'The Avengers' so I definitely had to watch this flick. I have to admit that I was at first positively surprised by the damned thing. Indeed, I really enjoyed the tone of the first part and it was pretty neat to see a super-hero flick taking place in the 40's for once. Furthemore, the whole thing looked really good and I was rather impressed by how they managed to make Chris Evans look really small and it did look really convincing. Furthermore, they took their time to establish Steve Rogers's  personality and it worked rather well, thanks to a solid performance by Chris Evans. So, I did enjoy the first half but, unfortunately, I wasn't really convinced by the rest of the movie. Eventually, the biggest issue was mainly with the plot which was basically some rather disposable succession of generic action scenes. At least, I have to admit that Red Skull was a pretty cool villain and the Nazis have always been the most dependable bad guys. However, just like with ‘Thor’, rewatching this movie 10 years later with the knowledge of all what would happen to this character, I have to admit that it was much more rewarding than I expected. That’s the funny thing, the most recent MCU efforts might have been much bigger but they also have become seriously formulaic while all these Phase one movies, with the notable exception of ‘Iron Man 2’, feel so much fresher and satisfying. Anyway, to conclude, even though it was maybe not a complete home-run, it was still a seriously entertaining super-hero flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 15 February 2012 10:59 (A review of Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me)

Even though I didn't expect much from the first movie, I thought it was eventually not bad at all and pretty entertaining and enjoyable. However, I wasn't really enthousiast about this sequel. I mean, Heather Graham was a perfect choice to replace Elizabeth Hurley and she delivered a decent performance. Unfortunately, a part from that, I was frankly bored during the whole thing. I mean, the time travel thing was just way too similar to the story of the first installment and I think they should have tried something else. Anyway, once again, you have the same combination of really lame and stupid jokes which is is inherent to the genre but whereas in the first movie, it was fresh and rather innovative, the second time around, you really get this feeling of 'déjà vu' and, as a result, the proceedings are just midly entertaining. To conclude, it wasn't really bad but I didn't really enjoy it and, honestly, it is not really worth a look, expect maybe if you are a huge fan of Austin Powers.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 15 February 2012 10:38 (A review of Star Trek: The Motion Picture)

About 13 years after the first serie started, they decided to finally make a feature length movie of this mythical TV-show. I have to admit that I have never seen this show but since it is one of the longest running movie franchises ever made, I was quite eager to check it out. First of all, to be honest,  the damned thing was rather long and slow (it is actually the longest movie of the whole franchise, at least, when I saw this movie) and there was no action scenes whatosever but it was not really surprising since the whole thing took place mostly on the Enterprise. In fact, the lack of action was actually made on purpose to contrast with 'Star Wars' which was filled with action stuff. Furthermore, the acting was also rather weak and wooden, especially by William Shatner who was sometimes borderline ridiculous. Still, there was some fascinating stuff as well. First of all, even though the whole ting looked sometimes rather cheesy, there were also some really impressive scenes, visually speaking, and I enjoyed the fact that they tried to make something rather cerebral instead of something action oriented. Furthermore, I also enjoyed all those characters working as a crew and this concept obviously became the blue print for so many TV-shows and SF movies that came afterwards. To conclude, even though it was definitely flawed, it was still quite entertaining and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 14 February 2012 12:23 (A review of Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery)

For years, I wasn't interested in this flick, I didn't think it would be really funny and I didn't really want to watch it. However, since I kept hearing good things about it, I thought I should give a try. Eventually, it wasn't bad at all. I think that the masterstroke of Mike Myers was to create a character who was really funny. Furthermore, even though he looks and sounds stupid, Austin Powers is so self-confident that he is actually kind of cool and could help root for the guy eventually. Anyway, it is a good mix and the fish-out-water situation was very well played as well. Furthermore, Elizabeth Hurley was just born to play such a part and gave a pretty decent performance, too bad we don't hear much from here anymore. Of course, it remains a parody and, as a result, the plot is rather weak and some jokes are really lame but I'm afraid it is inherent to the genre. To conclude, I think it deserves its reputation, it is a well made and funny spoof and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A very good movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 14 February 2012 11:26 (A review of Atonement)

Following his directing début, Joe Wright deciced to make another high-profile book adaptation but even though I did like his version of 'Pride and Prejudice', I must say that I enjoyed even more this second directing effort. In my opinion, it must be one of the most ultimate romantic dramas ever made. First of all, there was a top cast involved (Saoirse Ronan, Brenda Blethyn, James McAvoy, Keira Knightley, Juno Temple and Vanesssa Redgrave) and they all gave some really solid performances. Even better than the acting, the directing was just quite impressive and gorgeous with some amazing shots full of so many details (the color, the angle, the timing, the movement,...) . Basically, the story was divided in 3 parts (the discovery of love, the horror of war and the endless guilt) and I was quite fascinated by the first and last part,  I have to admit that I didn't care much about the middle section though, even though there was an amazing tracking shot who seemed to last forever on this French beach. I guess I have seen too many war movies and, as a result, I didn't care much about this segment but the rest of the movie was just spellbinding. To conclude, it was a beautiful and heartbreaking love story, very well made and acted, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.



0 comments, Reply to this entry

An average movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 13 February 2012 11:14 (A review of The Replacements)

This is a typical example of a guilty pleasure. Indeed, it is a rather stupid and predictable plot but I still thought it was rather entertaining. I have a really weak spot for Gene Hackman and without him, I would have probably not much enjoyed this movie. It is such a shame that he retired from the movie industry. A part from that, it is a basically 'Major League' with (American) football this time. You have your usual colorful characters leaded by Keanu Reeves who was not bad (if you don't expect much from Mr Reeves, he usually doesn't disappoint you). It gives also some insight on the fact that professional players are payed some ridiculous amount of money but it doesn't get really deep as it is a standard and predictable sport flick. To conclude, it is an average but rather well made and entertaining sport movie, and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.


0 comments, Reply to this entry

A good movie

Posted : 12 years, 10 months ago on 13 February 2012 09:26 (A review of A Home At The End Of The World)

This is a rather obscure movie starring Colin Farrell but I thought it was actually really intriguing. To be honest, the beginning was not really promising. Indeed, you had this 9 year old boy witnessing his older brother having sex and then, in the next scenes, you would see this older brother give him some an acid but the movie made it all seem as if it was the best thing in the world. I mean, I smoked a lot of weed and hash in my young years but what kind of hippie crap was that! So, at first, I wasn't really convinced but then, it wasn't a movie about drugs but a movie about love and, in this area, this flick was actually quite impressive. Indeed, the relationship between Bobby (played by Colin Farrell) and Jonathan (played by Dallas Roberts) was one of the most touching and genuine I have ever seen. With the addition of Clare (played by Robert Wright), it became even more fascinating to watch. Indeed, they were all some really fascinating characters and I have to compliment all three actors who all provided some strong performances. Who would have thought that Colin Farrell could deliver such a subtle and sensitive performance?!? Anyway, to conclude, even though it was flawed, it was still a very interesting and touching drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you are interested in watching Colin Farrell doing something totally different.



0 comments, Reply to this entry