
Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 11 September 2022 03:07
(A review of
Speak No Evil )
After watching 2 really heavy heartbreaking dramaâs with my filmclub, I hoped we would see something slightly lighter this time but Iâm afraid my friend Peter apparently didnât get the memo. Well, even though this movie did seem to receive some decent reviews, to be honest, I really had a hard time to care for it. The first thing that bothered me was the soundtrack. Indeed, they went for some typical ominous horror tunes during some completely quaint and innocent scenes and it felt really heavy-handed. Then, the other thing that bothered me was the fact these two couples were just so tedious to behold. At least, the Dutch couple with their anti-social behaviour was slightly more intriguing but the Danish couple was just so damned polite, spineless, and completely boring. It didnât help that none of these characters was really developed. At least, Fedja van HuĂȘt, probably one of the best Dutch actors at work nowadays, did deliver a really solid performance and did manage to make the most of this material. Indeed, van HuĂȘt managed to be threatening and disarmingly friendly and charismatic sometimes during the very same scene and this balancing act was actually quite impressive. To be honest, I have to admit there might have been some underlining meaning that I missed. Otherwise, what was the point of antagonising and scaring their victims prematurely? Another example would be the stoning scene. Sure, it was an original way to kill someone but it is also incredibly ineffective, especially from such a distance. So, there might have been a deeper meaning for all this but, to be honest, I simply wouldnât care about it. Anyway, to conclude, even though this movie didnât really work for me, I still think it was a decent watch though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 11 September 2022 08:17
(A review of
Peter Ibbetson (1935))
To be honest, I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was included in the â1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieâ list, I was quite eager to check it out. Unfortunately, after watching a pristine restored version of âThe Kid Brotherâ on YouTube, for this movie, the version I saw on YouTube as well was seriously bad. In fact, the beginning was pretty much unwatchable and I almost quit at some point. Concerning the movie itself, it turned out to be a strange and super romantic tale. For some reason, it did remind me of âWhen Harry met SallyâŠâ and how this movie could have turned out to be if the main characters were not so cynical. And, yet, with all its old-fashioned approach, I thought it actually did work which might be surprising since Iâm also quite cynical like Harry Burns and Sally Albright. I guess there was something pure and unambiguous on how they approached a romantic relationship. To be honest, the movie didnât have much else to offer though (with a running time of barely 85 mins, there was basically no time for it). There was also the fact that the story didnât make much sense. Wouldnât it have been more logical that Peter meet again Mary in Paris instead of during some completely random work assignment? In fact, even the two main characters were barely developed at all. Still, there is no denying that Gary Cooper (who, for some reason, thought he was miscast for this part) really made the most of this material and the guy was just super charismatic. Concerning Ann Harding, she wasnât bad either but she was given even less to do then Cooper. Anyway, to conclude, it turned out to be a solid vintage romantic drama and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 10 September 2022 08:56
(A review of
Pinocchio)
While we are all waiting for Guillermo Del Toroâs version to finally come out (seriously, I think it has been added more than 10 years ago on this website), I thought I might as well watch Robert Zemeckisâs version in the meantime l since it was already available on Disney+. Of course, like most of Disneyâs recent live action adaptations of their classic animated features, the damned thing felt really misguided from the start. Especially in this case, it felt even more pointless since they followed so faithfully the animated version. Sure, they did tweak a few details here and there but these details had so very little added value, you wonder if a shot-by-shot remake wouldnât have been more efficient. At least, it was visually not bad, even though I wasnât so sure about the approach they chose  for the main character. Sure, Pinocchio is supposed to be a wooden puppet but it felt as if the puppet was not completely finished yet, as if the wood was still raw, and it gave him a rather creepy look. Concerning the story, it has always been one of the weirdest and even more unsettling tales delivered by Disney, something you will never see anytime soon again coming from these guys. Here, with this modern adaptation, they tried to smooth out some of the dark edges somehow but the end-result was rather unsatisfying since they never settled for a specific tone. And, yet, it is still a fascinating tale and I just loved the relationship between Pinocchio and Geppetto, even in this really misguided new version. Anyway, to conclude, Iâm pretty sure I was really too generous with my rating here but I guess I might still be worth a look but you should definitely lower your expectations before watching the damned thing.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 9 September 2022 10:57
(A review of
Hellzapoppin')
To be honest, I had never heard of this movie before so I had no idea what to expect from it but since it was included in the âThey Shoot Pictures, Donât They?â list, I thought I might as well check it out. First of all, it was definitely one of the coolest movie names I have ever come across and, eventually, the damned thing turned out to be a really nice surprise after all. Indeed, it is probably one of the craziest and most freewheeling movies I have ever seen. It was apparently based on a very successful Broadway show and I can imagine how wild it must have been on stage back then. Obviously, they probably had to vastly modify this show to adapt it as a motion picture but Iâm pretty sure this transition also allowed them to be really creative, at least, thatâs what I would expect considering the end-result. Of course, the whole thing was really random and the endless succession of gags was also quite relentless but I was mostly entertained and even fairly impressed by the creativity displayed. In fact, they actually did include a plot involving a pretty basic love triangle. Well, to be honest, I have seen my share of classic vintage romantic-comedies with a similar plot and while many would argue that these movies are amazing, I always had a hard time to really care for them. Eventually, as far as I was concerned, I really did appreciate how they took such a typical romantic-comedy gimmick (especially back then in the 30âs and 40âs) and turned it completely upside down. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was probably not a masterpiece, it was a really entertaining flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially you are eager to watch something really original and pretty wild.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 8 September 2022 11:56
(A review of
Fresh)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was selected by IndieWire as one of the best movies released in 2022 so far and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though it definitely did have some potential, to be honest, I wasnât completely sold though. Sure, I have to admit that the directing by first-timer Mimi Cave was pretty neat and she managed to create a really nice mood. Furthermore, Daisy Edgar-Jones and Sebastian Stan both did deliver some really solid performances. Unfortunately, even though the approach chosen by Mimi Cave was definitely intriguing, eventually, the plot was just too generic and predictable after all. Basically, the main character was adducted but, somehow, she will manage to figure out a way to get away which was probably the least original way possible to handle such a story. The fact that it took almost 2 hours to get there with only a handful of characters involved probably didnât help. For example, what was the point of giving Steve a family? I mean, considering his âoccupationâ, it would have made much more sense if he would have been a single man. As a result, Charlotte Le Bon did end up with a completely half-baked and rather unnecessary character. Finally, there were some ideas I didnât care much for. For example, the idea that a man who doesnât have an Instagram account or a Twitter account (as a matter of fact, I donât have any of these) canât be trusted was rather annoying. Of course, it was probably meant as a joke but it just didnât really work for me. On the other hand, I really liked how they displayed that modern dating with all these dating apps is pretty much downright awful. Anyway, to conclude, even if this movie turned out to be slightly disappointing, I have to admit that it was still a decent watch though and it is worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 7 September 2022 11:03
(A review of
The Kid Brother)
I always felt bad that discovered Buster Keaton so late. Well, it took me even longer to see my first movie starring Harold Lloyd but, at least, it was definitely worth the wait, thatâs for sure. First of all, I saw a restored version on YouTube and I must say I was amazed by its pristine quality which you wouldnât expect from a silent movie already almost 100 years old. Concerning the movie itself, it was apparently Harold Lloydâs favorite among all his films so I got lucky to discover his work with, allegedly, one of his best movies. Sure, like most silent comedies, the whole thing was rather random but I thought the story was actually fairly well developed. Above all, the damned thing was just so entertaining. Seriously, I canât remember the last time I saw such a hilarious silent movie. Basically, the whole thing is an endless succession of very clever gags and I was amazed that so many of them worked so well. In fact, there were so many, I donât think I could pick up any of them as a favorite and, maybe, thatâs a downside, but I think it was more a luxury problem. Itâs also interesting that the 3 biggest stars of the silent comedies (Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd) were all rather small and all played some mild-mannered men who were all miles away from you average tall handsome athletic male movie star. At least, back in those days, you could actually identify with the characters in your average motion picture. Or, maybe, Iâm actually mistaken, in comedies, you still have nowadays such seemingly average looking guys, itâs just that comedies are not the biggest draw at the box-office anymore and it has been so for a very long time. Anyway, to conclude, I really loved the damned thing and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 6 September 2022 08:55
(A review of
Prey)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it was rather well received and since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, even though I always had a weak spot for âPredatorâ, they have actually always struggled with this franchise. Indeed, through more than 3 decades, they gave us pretty much everything from sequels, prequels, spin-offs and none of them really worked. Well, it seems that after all these years, they finally managed to deliver a solid prequel after all. While watching this movie, I thought it was too bad the characters spoke in English and I discovered afterwards that there was actually a version in Commanche language available on Hulu but I saw it on Disney+ where only the English version was available. Concerning the story itself, the concept was eventually pretty basic and the damned thing was pretty much a remake of the 1st movie but thatâs also why it probably actually worked though. There was also the fact that, even though it was neat that the main character was a woman for once, the whole issue about her being considered not fit to be a hunter by all the men (and women as well) in her tribe was rather clichĂ© and predictable. On the other hand, the fact that the main character was a woman actually explained why she was actually so skilled. Indeed, in contrary to all the guys in her tribe, she had to work twice harder to prove to everyone and even to herself that she was actually a worthy fighter and, as a result, she did acquire a mighty set of skills in the process. Eventually, it was just so damned entertaining to see how an Indian with only an axe and some arrows might be able to survive and even beat such an ultimate warrior like a Predator with all his fancy hi-tech and, above all, lethal gadgets. Anyway, to conclude, even if it was nothing really groundbreaking, it was still a really solid action flick though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre. Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 5 September 2022 11:41
(A review of
The Reckless Moment)
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a solid reputation (it is included in the â1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieâ list among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. Well, eventually, it turned out to be a solid film noir, no doubt out it but, to be honest, the plot was slightly too thin for my taste. On the other hand, there is no denying that both Joan Bennett and James Mason gave some strong performances here. Indeed, I have to admit that I wasnât really familiar with Bennett before watching this movie but she managed to be really convincing as a housewife and, yet, she was still quite charismatic at the same time and this balance act was trickier than it looked. It was also intriguing how she managed her whole household on her own and, at the same time, she constantly kept her cool while being involved with homicides, blackmail and gangsters. On the other hand, I was quite familiar with James Mason and the guy, as usual, didnât disappoint me. Indeed, within a few seconds he appeared on the screen, Mason delivered one of the most unique blackmailer I have ever seen. On one hand, it was really obvious that the guy really meant business but, on the other hand, there was also something strikingly gentle and polite about him which would be the last thing you would expect from someone working in this line of business. Eventually, I was really on the edge of my seat wondering what would happen to these 2 very interesting characters. However, it was a rather short movie (not even 90 mins) so, after only 10 mins, Donelly was already in love with Lucia Harper. In my opinion, this development occurred way too soon and slightly ruined the whole thing for me because, among other things, the whole thing went on auto-pilot from this point on. Anyway, to conclude, in spite of its flaws, it was still a decent watch though and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 4 September 2022 09:01
(A review of
Lightyear)
A movie made by Pixar is always a big event and, even though this movie was rather poorly received, since it was available on Disney+, I thought I might as well check it out. Well, Iâm afraid, I would have to agree with the critics here. Indeed, it has been years since Pixar had released such a weak movie, in fact, it might even be their weakest movie so far. Itâs also a shame and incredibly frustrating that the vastly superior âSoulâ, âTurning Redâ or even âLucaâ didnât get a theatrical release while this movie did. Of course, you might wonder if a spin-off around the âToy Storyâ franchise was not misguided but I donât think it was such a bad idea. For starters, after âWall-Eâ, it was Pixarâs second SF feature only and, therefore, there were tons of creative potential. Even the fact that the main character was voiced by Chris Evans and not by Tim Allen was a strange choice but it did work out fine after all. Eventually, the biggest issue was that the story turned out to be rather weird and so convoluted for no good reasons. To make things worse, the damned thing was just way too long. I mean, the first 30 mins were not bad, it was still nothing great though, but the tone seemed to be right. However, from the moment Buzz came back from his first mission 4 years later, they tried to mix some dark and gritty SF elements into a classic Disney family feature and this mix didnât work at all. At least, SOX and DERIC were fun but all the other characters were completely forgettable and underwhelming. They also added another twist regarding Zurgâs origins which was something fun in âToy Story 2â but, here, it felt, like the rest of this movie, rather convoluted but above all, hardly entertaining. Anyway, to conclude, I think my rating was actually rather generous here but I guess it might still be be worth a look, at least, if you are a big fan of Pixarâs work.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry

Posted : 2 years, 8 months ago on 3 September 2022 09:00
(A review of
Little Caesar (1931))
I wasnât really sure what to expect from this flick but since it seemed to have a solid reputation (it is included in the â1001 Movies You Must See Before You Dieâ list among other things), I was quite eager to check it out. Well, to be honest, I donât think this movie grew old very well. I mean, 90 years after it was released, so many vastly superior gangster flicks have been released such as âThe Godfatherâ 1 and 2, âGoodfellasâ, âScarfaceâ and many others. And yet, even if this movie was maybe not the first in this genre, it was certainly a major trendsetter, the precursor of all the gritty gangster movies that came in the 30âs but also afterwards up until nowadays. On top of that, even if the movie itself didnât really impress me, I have to admit that Edward G. Robinson was pure gold though. Indeed, the guy was just so convincing and even if you maybe didnât like his character, he was still seriously charismatic. Sure, he was definitely not a nice guy but he was tough and rather smart and, eventually, it all made sense how Little Caesar managed to climb up the ladder in the mob world. As a result, this realistic approach made the whole thing quite compelling to behold. However, the rest of the movie didnât have much to offer, Iâm afraid. Indeed, none of the other characters was remarkable whatsoever. Itâs also interesting that there was only one female character involved, a character barely developed, and you might wonder why the main character didnât have a girlfriend or a lover which is usually a main attribute for any average gangster. Anyway, to conclude, even if it didnât complete blow me away, it was still a really solid vintage gangster flick and it is definitely worth a look, especially if you like the genre.Â

0 comments,
Reply to this entry